Talk:Damian Drum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Portal	Damian Drum is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
	This article is supported by WikiProject AFL.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

I don't think that this person is notable enough to have such a long article to them. So I am going to delete bits of it.  :)--harrismw 06:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

If you think the person is not notable, then nominate it for deletion. There's not a chance in hell it would get anything but a strong consensus to keep. With this in mind, please do not remove perfectly relevant facts from the article, as this could well be considered vandalism. Ambi 06:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I said that he wasn't notable enough to have such a long article, I wasn't wanting to delete it. There is also POV which I have removed, while leaving your precious facts intact.

I also don't think that his nephew needs to be mentioned in the article.

Wikipedia is meant as a collaborative effort to make articles better, I felt that my changes were making the article better, would you have reverted them if I didn't say anything in the talk page? harrismw 03:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes. You removed perfectly pertinent information, and I'm not convinced that any of the text you removed was POV material at all. Ambi 03:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

So let me explain it then. (And please do not continue to revert all the time, it is annoying.)

renowned - who says so? I don't think he is renowned, so having that there is POV.

devastating - dito. It wasn't devastating for the team that won was it?

major - in this context is a tautology landslide implies big lose, no need for major.

So please respond, and also respond to my question on the nephew. harrismw 03:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)