From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
|
This article is being improved by WikiProject Rational Skepticism. Wikiproject Rational Skepticism seeks to improve the quality of articles dealing with science, pseudosciences, pseudohistory and skepticism. Please feel free to help us improve this page.
See Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
|
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
[edit] Self publicity?
There are nearly no google hits outside wikipedia for this guy. It might not be a hoax (he might write for newsweek), but still there's still no given notability. Even some of the links to articles presumably written by him have no signature. The article talks about nameless awards, and it completelly lacks of references. Mariano(t/c) 07:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
It is self-publicity, User:Danifb is the author, and is totally non-notable. Just an average journalist. Barcex (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)