User talk:Dalejenkins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Re: The Apprentice (UK) images
The images shouldn't be there on Murder, She Wrote either. Thanks for pointing out the inconsistency. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Happy Birthday
 |
Just a happy Birthday message to you, Dalejenkins, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
- FROM YOUR FRIEND:
ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Newmessage
Template:Newmessage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — —AldeBaer 07:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Chanelle
She is still in the house, and therefore, is still classed as a housemate. She is still a housemate until she is officially removed from the house. The Big Brother website is still stating she has not let yet, her picture does not say 'Walked', and it has not been confirmed by any official programs such as Highlights Little Brother, Big Mouth, DR Uncut etc. She has been told to stay until tomorrow, by which time, she may have decided to stay after all. To clarify: she has not left so why say on a supposed factual site that she has.Babygurl1853 18:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- it is called making a mistake, or isn't a person allowed to do that anymore? Babygurl1853 18:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dale, one can't be banned for not signing posts. If you want to inform people that they haven't been signing posts I would suggest using {{subst:uw-tilde}} as this produces a standard message, worded in a civil manner. Thanks. John Hayestalk 18:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Through the Looking Glass (Lost)
Your complaints are now invalid so I'm hoping that you will change your vote. I like that new messages notice at the top of your userpage. :) --thedemonhog talk • edits 20:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- (In response to your comment on my userpage) You first. --thedemonhog talk • edits 17:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- (In response to your latest Apprentice comment on my talk page) It seems that Gran2 fixed the broken link. [1] --thedemonhog talk • edits 17:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the vote. --thedemonhog talk • edits 17:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] History of Baltimore City College
Thank you for your comment on this FAC. I took a quick look through the article for things that should be cited as {{cite book}}, but could not find any. I could have very easily over looked it though, so could you just give an example so I know what to look for. Thanks, Golem88991 13:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Big Brother
You have banned me from posting??
the only reason why i deleted those tags was because i had edited the page —Preceding unsigned comment added by In23065 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 2 August, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sports Notability
Hey. I'm not trying to argue the closing of the afds or anything, I was just wondering what the guidelines for sports notability are. Thanks. Oh, and I am a huge Yankees fan and I have nothing against the Pittsburgh Pirates. Eggy49er 20:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Apprentice (UK) FAC
I'll remove my opposition to the nomination because as said in my retracted support my disagreement is mainly a structural one. However on reflection, I believe that if the article is to remain with the current sections, these sections should be expanded. With respect to the argument that the sections are this length because there's very little more that could be added, that is the basis for me saying the sections should be merged. If they're expandable, the article could be improved and thus should be. If they're complete, in my opinion they're too short to be sections.
My apologies if I'm coming across as overly critical of what is otherwise a decent article. BeL1EveR 21:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
"However" is used throughout, and there is a mixture of spaced endashes and spaced emdashes. Per WP:DASH, spaced emdashes are never used, unspaced emdashes is the preference, and spaced endashes is an alternative. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- There are also many formatting errors in the footnotes/refs that should be cleaned up. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your signature
Hi, Your signature currently has a link asking for support for [2]. I was wondering if it violates WP:CANVAS. Oh and the way you send people to There is a sucker born every minute is absolutely hilarious. Shabda 18:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
That's ridiculous considering I didn't revert a fourth time. Alientraveller 20:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please be more civil
Dale, I know you are acting in good faith, and care about the articles you contribute to, but could I just ask you to be a little more civil towards other users (especially new ones). I have now twice seen you give warnings for first offences saying the user can be blocked [3] [4], but for the first offence you should use level 1 warnings for new users, or level 2 warnings for other users (which don't mention blocks), as these allow for users not knowing/understanding the rules, rather than trying to break them; being too aggresive may cause the project to loose potentially valuable contributors. If the users then break these then it becomes the time to use level 3 and then level 4 warnings, where notices of potential blocks are acceptable. See WP:WARN for all notices and warnings. Also in the case of User talk:In23065 you shouldn't have reinstated the warning, while it's best practise to archive rather than delete, it's not policy, and a user can delete whatever they want from their talk page (just as you can delete this). As a final point, TYPING LIKE THIS doesn't make what you are saying any more true, it just comes across aggressively. I hope you take this in the way it is meant, as a guidance rather than criticism. Thanks. John Hayestalk 11:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kingdom Hearts II FAC
The nominators and associated editors have tried to address your concern over the Kingdom Hearts II FAC. I invite you to reconsider your opposition as the FAC draws to a close. Axem Titanium 15:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:LittlewillieBB.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:LittlewillieBB.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cite templates
Hi, Dale. I've noticed twice now that you've Opposed FACs because they don't use the cite templates for books; that's not a valid oppose. As long as footnotes are consistently formatted, the citing method is not a WP:WIAFA criteria. Many people (myself included) dislike the cite templates because they are so clunky and inconsistent; their use is not a requirement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Apprentice candidate articles
Hi Dale, thanks for the heads up - in the hope that others will join the discussion, I've replied on the talk page. Also, I added my 2 cents at the admin noticeboard - something needs to be done really as I feel Matthew (talk · contribs) isn't being fair with his FAC requests. Seaserpent85 19:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your signature
Hi, could you please remove the link to the FAC review from your signature, it's a very large amount of text to be displayed in addition to the large amount of code required, so can often be longer than some of the comments to which you reply to. It's really frowned upon by our canvassing policy too and by leaving a link to the FAC review on every page you sign, you're likely to upset people. Ideally, your new signature should be a little below 200 characters including spaces. Thanks in advance. Nick 22:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sucker? I Think Not
You might want to the underlining off the "new messages" thing you have on your userpage. ;) It gives it away. =) -WarthogDemon 18:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Apprentice (UK Series Three)
I passed the article. Apologies for the delay, but I was on holiday. Unfortunately I am not the same Zeus that you pointed out to me, I am someone completely different. I am, however, still a fan of The Apprentice UK. Zeus1234 21:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ziggy
Dale, if you are going to redirect Ziggy, you need to reach a consensus. Considering that it has now survived two AfDs it would seem that he is notable enough for his own article. Nonetheless if you really want to go ahead with the redirect (effectively deleting his page) you need to place the appropriate templates on the page, and his talk page, suggesting it should be merged, and explain your reasons on the talk page. After a significant amount of time (say at least a week), if consensus is reached to merge, then you make change it to a redirect. Thanks. John Hayes - On Vacationtalk 16:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Just to let you know, you can find the templates you will need at Template:Mergefrom and Template:Mergeto. I will of course oppose the merge for the reasons I gave in the two AfDs.John Hayes - On Vacationtalk 16:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apprentice WikiProject
Hi Dale, just to let you know I've given the project a big tidy up! We now have a rating system implemented (after quite a lot of work to get it there!) which is fully updated by a bot :) What do you think our next article for GA should be? I'd be happy to work backwards and polish off Series Two...what do you think? Seaserpent85Talk 18:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability (Reality Television participants)
The procedure for creating a new guideline is to first propose it (as currently tagged) and then gain consensus from a meaningful cross section of contributors. One person can not dictate a new guideline, and it looks lije the only other contributions have been in correcting errors of spelling and formatting. I've retagged this as a proposal, advertised it at the Village Pump, the Notabiltiy and BIO talk pages, and properly included it in the incguide as a proposal. I suggest that you begin the talk page with a justification for the proposal. Few proposals make it to guideline status. Good luck, though I will likely be among the opposition. Cheers! --Kevin Murray 18:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar!
 |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| This is for all of your hard work and contributions to articles related to The Apprentice (UK). Just wanted to let you know that your work doesn't go unnoticed and is much appreciated by other editors in the WikiProject. :) Seaserpent85Talk 14:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] The Apprentice Episode Names
Hi Dale, I was just wondering about the episode names in the Apprentice articles. I propose that we get rid of the 'titles' and just go by week numbers. Reason being is that series one has uncitable episode names, series two doesn't have episode names and therefore someone has made them up and for series three they are off the BBC website, not really official. What do you think? I also noticed that at the beginning of each episode the week number is spelt out too, ie. Week Eleven not Week 11. Seaserpent85Talk 17:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No content in Category:2008 in Television
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:2008 in Television, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:2008 in Television has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:2008 in Television, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ziggy
it didnt have that much information on it. DeadWood 22:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 |
The Special Barnstar | |
| For reinstating the link to Ziggy's article even after your opposition to the article's existance John Hayestalk 23:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] BBC Sitcoms task force
Hi, Dalejenkins! You were named as a participant in the WikiProject BBC Sitcoms. Due to inactivity, and with the permission of Mollsmolyneux this has now been made a task force of WikiProject BBC.
Please come and take a look at the new page at BBC Sitcoms task force.
I hope you'll continue to contribute to the work of the new taskforce. If you are no longer interested in participating in the task force please strike out your name in the list. Thanks very much.
Boy1jhn 08:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brian Belo
You were quite right to move the article back the Brian Belo, I realised after I had done it that the popular name (as in Elton John) is more important that the real name, and (unlike the example of Ziggy/Zachary Lichman) I have never heard him refered to as Olawale Belo. I still don't agree with his notablity though, but that's a matter for his talk page. John Hayestalk 10:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Oh
Oh right. sorry. nhf yea. DeadWood 10:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Could you explain something?
I had to split the Weekly Summary of Big Brother 2007 (UK) into Big Brother 2007 (UK) highlights because the main article was 83 KB before the split. Now since this is part of Big Brother 2007 (UK) how do I link the highlights page from other articles besides the main article it is from. I really don't understand the whole "Orphan" page thing and not to be rude it is sorta confusing to me that List of Big Brother 2007 housemates (UK) (which relates to the main Big Brother 2007 UK article) isn't linked to any articles but the main article and it don't display this message. My point is the only related article I can see that is related to Big Brother 2007 (UK) highlights is Big Brother 2007 (UK) and really isn't orphaned to me. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 17:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I have removed the tag again. The page is not orphaned per Wikipedia:Orphan, since it is linked to from Big Brother 2007 (UK). If you wish to add this tag again, please explain why in the edit summary or on the talk page or, better still, add in the relevant links from related articles that you think are necessary. Tra (Talk) 17:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
 |
On 2 September 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dumped, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Daniel 01:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of various Big Brother contestants
Dale, in relation to the AfD/merge proposals on Brian Belo and Charley Kazim Uchea, you have stated things like "notable per WP:N" or "WP:BLP1E does not apply". I would suggest that these policies say nothing of the sort, but I would welcome your input in those discussions to explain how you feel these policies are met. If it can be shown that they are notable after all I would be happy to support keeping them, but as far as I can tell, from reading these policies that neither are notable enough, at this moment in time, for an article outside of the Big Brother article. John Hayestalk 19:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:JadevShilpa.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JadevShilpa.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tra (Talk) 21:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Girlsteam.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Girlsteam.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Loosewomenlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Loosewomenlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyedit and proofread for Apprentice UK complete
The Leage of Copyeditors has completed your request for a copyedit and proof of Apprentice UK. Please see the talk page for a comment regarding the proofread. Thanks! Galena11 16:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:AlanSugarBook.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AlanSugarBook.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Photo Request Image
Hello. I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Avoid self-references#Photo Request regarding the photo request image. I see you have removed these (as here) so your contributions would be much appreciated.--UpDown 17:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image source problem with Image:Badgerorbustlogo.JPG
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Badgerorbustlogo.JPG. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Louis return.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Louis return.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 18:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Leonaandthechoir.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Leonaandthechoir.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 17Drew 22:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Simpsons WikiProject membership update
The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.
Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.
If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!
The The Simpsons WikiProject team – 15:36, June 11, 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kaul.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Kaul.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Series1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Series1.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Katiehopkinsvmichellemone.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Katiehopkinsvmichellemone.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:The Apprentice (UK) candidates
I have nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 12:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Sharon_o.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sharon_o.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 01:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Daily star 18 05 2007.JPG
I have tagged Image:Daily star 18 05 2007.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Nauseef 00:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sharon Osbourne image
It says on your image that you uploaded of [[Sharon Osbourne] that it has not source information. But there is clearly a box stating that you have released this image into the public domain. I don't know what's going on there! Eagle Owl 11:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] BB Sidebars
Hi Dalejenkins, I just wanted to tell you that I am proposing a change to the sidebars used in the US, UK, and Australian versions. You can view the discussion here at WP:BIGBRO or here at Template:Big Brother UK sidebar. Thanks ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 06:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image source problem with Image:Girlsteam.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Girlsteam.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 18:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Daily star 18 05 2007.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Daily star 18 05 2007.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Katie Apprentice.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Katie Apprentice.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation
Hello there
I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.
At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars
If you are interested by all means feel free to join, I notice you live in Wales. I used to live in Herefordshire. What part are you in then? If you do reply please do it on my talkpage as i'm sure you can imagine i have sent these invites out to many many people and can not keep track of all the users.
Regards
[edit] Lemony Snicket
 |
Hello, Dalejenkins! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Lemony Snicket, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for making the wikiproject active once again. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list. |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Episodeapp
A tag has been placed on Template:Episodeapp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Sun front.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sun front.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Justmeherenow (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008
| WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 13:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008
| WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Badgerorbustlogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Badgerorbustlogo.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Happy First Edit Day
| HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! | from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE | |
|---|---|---|
  Wishing Dalejenkins a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee |
||
Idontknow610TM 01:05, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] happy First Edit Day fellow Wikipedian!
|
Happy First Edit Day, Dalejenkins, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
Best wishes from Canada! ;-) --RobNS 04:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Katiehopkins.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Katiehopkins.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Million_Moments (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
