Dakota County v. Glidden
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dakota County v. Glidden | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
Argued January 5, 1885 Decided January 26, 1885 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||
Chief Justice: Morrison Waite Associate Justices: Samuel Freeman Miller, Stephen Johnson Field, Joseph Philo Bradley, John Marshall Harlan, William Burnham Woods, Thomas Stanley Matthews, Horace Gray, Samuel Blatchford |
||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||
Dakota County v. Glidden, [1]
, was a motion to dismiss a suit issued in aid of a railroad. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant brought a writ of error to reverse it. Subsequently to the judgment, the county settled with the plaintiff and other bondholders, by giving them new bonds bearing a less rate of interest, and the old bonds, which were the cause of action in this suit, were surrendered and destroyed. These facts were brought before this Court by affidavits and transcripts from the county records, accompanied by a motion to dismiss the writ of error.While payment of the sum recovered in submission to the judgment is no bar to the right of reversal of the judgment when brought here by writ of error, a compromise and settlement of the demand in suit, whereby a new agreement is substituted in place of the old one, extinguishes the cause of action, and leaves nothing for the exercise of the jurisdiction of this Court.
Evidence of facts outside of the record, affecting the proceeding of the court in a case on error or appeal, will be received and considered, when deemed necessary by the court, for the purpose of determining its action.
The court saw no reason to impeach the transaction by which the new bonds were substituted for the old, and the writ of error was accordingly dismissed.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ Dakota County v. Glidden, 113 U.S. 222 (1885) Justia.com
[edit] External links
- 113 222 Justia.com (full case)