User talk:D4g0thur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] Changes to User:Skankyyoda

Thanks for your message, and my apologies for reverting helpful changes.

In my defence, however, I think it's fair to say that the majority of changes to user pages made by someone other than the user themselves are generally acts of vandalism (the only two times someone other than me has changed my user page have both been vandalism), and the diff (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Skankyyoda&diff=133653667&oldid=133653393) showed primarily the repeated insertion of the same userbox a substantial number of times, which could quite easily, in other circumstances, be a form of vandalism. As I'm sure you'll appreciate, when vandal fighting time is a bit of a luxury, and whilst I agree that you are name-checked as Dagoth Ur on the page itself, it doesn't immediately strike one that it's the same as D4gOthur. Anyway, will happily make a mental note of your relationship and ignore any future changes. Gilesbennett 11:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

... for looking after my user page. Good to know there are guardian angels out there who care for me.  :) JackofOz 13:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 0_0

How the heck did you find my secret page so fast? I made it 5 minutes ago, and, BAM! you already found it!?!?! How did you find it 0_0 ...-- Penubag  06:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • So you found it through the recent changes. I cleared my cookies before I signed in and made that edit, so that's why there's an Ip address. LOL wikiballs... And you have my reward on your page! =-D-- Penubag  07:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reward

Hey D4g0thur, congratulations on finding the hidden page! Here is your reward, you've earned it!

The Hidden Link Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to D4g0thur for finding the super secret hidden link on Selfworm's page!
Good job!

Cheating is fine; I guess that I'll just have to make it cheat proof somehow. _selfworm_ ( Talk · Contribs )_ 17:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] page arrangement

I've switched two of the boxen around, that's the best it's going to get, unless you care to provide an alternate layout... :P - Imperator Honorius 14:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] a barnstar.... for your fixing of disambiguation links.

The Working Man's Barnstar
Well done for fixing lots of links to disambiguated pages, changing them to go to the correct article, it is a noble cause. So you deserve this barnstar, I also realise it must be tedious, hence it being a Working Man's one... So here's your just dessert. :P - Imperator Honorius 09:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Raoul Wallenberg Traditional High School

Hi. The letters to the principal added to that page have been added and reverted several times, so it may be time to stop assuming good faith with respect to these additions to that page. I put a note on the talk page. Cheers! Flyguy649talkcontribs 14:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem! I found it from RC patrol, too, a while back and added it to my watch list. That's why I know it was b.s. Cheers! Flyguy649talkcontribs 14:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your AIV report

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Anas talk? 16:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

True, but the warning is not recent. Whenever a final warning, or any warning for that matter, is 4 days old or more, the vandal must be warned again, and you must go through all three or four warnings before you report him. Cheers, Anas talk? 20:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Easy to assemble.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Easy to assemble.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Unint 01:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Magik Two.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Magik Two.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spelling variety

[redacted. my bad.] --Quiddity 18:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

The primary purpose of my edit was actually to correct a link to a disambiguation page rather than check spelling; however, my eye was caught by the misspelling of catalogue as catalog so I checked for other errors. Also note that the article's subject is a Canadian band and in Canada, although American spelling is not uncommon, the French-derived endings are standard (see Canadian_English#Spelling for more details). For these reasons I am reverting to my version. D4g0thur 18:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I've been living next to America for too long! Most sorry. I shouldn't edit pre-coffee. Was/am functioning on autopilot... --Quiddity 18:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
No problems, I sometimes forget how to spell as well... too much American TV probably! :P D4g0thur 04:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:SongBird_logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SongBird_logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 09:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

There is a description. Please do not misuse warning templates. D4g0thur 09:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Could you help with Genya Ravan once more?

Hi. As you were among those who edited the article recently, could you please help and try to correct it once more? The modifications by that IP 74.194.148.78 I consider rather as vandalism than contribution. Among others, they consist of an exact reproduction from the printed biography. But as details have been changed afterwards and I am lacking experience with this kind of situation, I am probably unable to correct that article the right way. :-(

TIA--Psycho Chicken 14:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I tried my best. Was your link to the IP-user's page an educated guess or finger-trouble? :-)) Anyway, I added something on the talk page, there (then moved it to the other one).--Psycho Chicken 08:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] link request

Hi, can i have a link on the UK manchester page,

Nicks removals Manchester removal company http://www.nicksremovals.co.uk

cherrs Nick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Removals076 (talkcontribs) 00:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LazyTown

Hello fellow LazyTown afficionado! Greetings from Japan. Just dropped by to say that, and that you have a great taste for TV shows! Plancus 17:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stephanie 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephanie 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stephanie 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephanie 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Congratulations

On finding my secret page. In return, I would love for you to enjoy a smile. Enjoy your day. Zenlax Talk Contributions Signatures 19:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Haunted School (Goosebumps)

This is about your comment on this artical. You talk about how it is just about how it is just a plot synopsis and a trivia section and it is written entirely in-universe. Well most articals (if not all) on here about books are just that so I don't really see what the problem is.Wild ste (talk) 15:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stephanie 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephanie 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DJ Sammy - The Rise.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DJ Sammy - The Rise.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of User talk:71.234.158.233

A tag has been placed on User talk:71.234.158.233, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 18:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fftmc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fftmc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DJ Sammy - The Rise.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DJ Sammy - The Rise.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hidden userpage barnstars?

I am new, can you explain this to me? --SpockMonkey (talk) 17:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

okay. Heres how it works. Find a hidden userpage, (tip:where you would least expect it) and then they usually give you a barnstar, click here for more info on barnstars. Nothing444 14:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Nothig44, I already answered him on his page because he is unlikely to check back here for reply... Happy Editing. D4g0thur 15:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Secret Page

I finally finished my secret page. Can you find it?--RyRy5 (talk) 05:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)