User talk:D.G.DeL-Dorchester Mass
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] What?
Hey, "Loaded-with-typos." Slow down and please explain using proper grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. — BQZip01 — talk 04:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Randomtime (talk) 19:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Seperation of human organism
A tag has been placed on Seperation of human organism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 19:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ATOA
Interested to see that they have created an entire topic for you on the ATOA forums. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blog
This page is for other Wikipedians to leave you messages and for you to reply. If you just want somewhere to record your thoughts, I suggest most strongly that you create your own blog. Probably the most popular host is Blogger. Blogs there cost nothing. (I have three.) -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
…My experience in the matter was of study concerning the Living Organism,which is considered as a form of substance created in a wet climate a water way an oceananic atmosphere,Dg.DeL-Dorchester Mass better known as David George DeLancey,had also experienced the studies of Human and a conclutional appeirence of both carectors being of no final evaluation,which is a terming of continuance,if thier was any variable amongst the standards of Knowledge here,it will be ofcourse represented.3:29p.m.e.s.t.David George DeLancey (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
…The Satisfaction of using a User talk Page is of great Performance i shall continue with the efforts of Art Economics History,3:51 p.m. e.s.t.David George DeLancey (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Non-finite clause worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please write in whole sentences, and place them in the proper portion of the article (not following the "See also" or "References" sections, as you did. Chris the speller (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
…Thank you i attempted to use the talk page something went i will conduct more patience ,though i do have an established talk page now on it Non-finite clause till next4:50 P.M. E.S.T.David George DeLancey (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Separation of Human Organism
I was not able to follow most of what you were saying, nor do I understand the purpose of your communication. Perhaps if you grouped your thoughts into sentences I would have an easier time understanding. — Knowledge Seeker দ 07:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: your 18 March 2008 edit of Long Depression
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Talk:Long Depression. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. In particular, an article talk page is reserved for editors' discussions concerning article biases, shortcomings, sins of omission and commission, and how to rectify those. In light of these aims, your whimsy is misplaced. Consider opening your own web site or starting a blog. Thank you. Gosgood (talk) 12:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
