Talk:D-Yikes!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	D-Yikes! is part of WikiProject South Park, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia articles related to South Park. If you wish to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-Importance on the importance scale.

1 Confusion in the page
2 Lesbos trivia?
3 Goofs
4 300 References
5 Information in multiple sections
6 Symbols on Xerxes
7 Don Imus
8 Mr. Garrison
9 Fair use rationale for Image:Les Bos Cocktails.png
10 Fair use rationale for Image:Xerxes (South Park).png
11 Fair use rationale for Image:This is les bos.png

[edit] Confusion in the page

At different points in the page, the address is listed as different numbers. One spelling lesbos backwards, and the next spelling lezbo in leet. Which is it? Puresholtz 06:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lesbos trivia?

Could the bar Les Bos be a parody of Lesbos (the Greek Island)?

Yes, it is. This is pointed out twice on the page.--K Lady112 04:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Um... I'm pretty sure its a parody of "Lesbo" in the sense of "Lesbian". The Greek island was just the home island of a woman who we named lesbians after. So it may be a parody of Lesbos but only because Lesbo is assosciated with Lesbian. 71.197.14.47 02:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Goofs

Did you notice that the least common denominator for 1/2 and 1/4 is wrong(there are three examples on the blackboard, two are fine and this one is wrong) ?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.188.85.61 (talk) 15:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

This is true. --81.219.231.40 14:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

You are right, since the LCD for 2 and 4 is 4, not 8. Though, since it's the first example on the board, they might have used a simplistic approach first, teaching them to multiply both numbers together and leave it at that (which isn't really LEAST common denominator, but gets the job done in a pinch). Jaimeastorga2000 18:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

another thing, this quote "Once again, Eric Cartman demonstrates his proficiency in Spanish when hiring Mexicans" isn't exactly true. cartman's spanish is awful and he refers to the sea as "la mer", which is french.

to whoever wrote the above...if you do not understand humor, do not post on south park or edit it. everyone knows cartman sucks at spanish, that is the point. it is called humor. look it up in the dictionary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.12.135 (talk) 01:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The least common denominator of two integers is always 1. The least common multiple of 2 and 4 is 4. 99.233.27.82 15:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Jordan

[edit] 300 References

Continuing the trend from last week's episode with Will Donohue's death, this episode is a clear parody of 300. There should be a section exclusively for 300 references. Applesanity 06:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Way too many facts. Look, we all know it's a parody. Why point out the completely obvious parallels, like the kicks to the nuts scene. Wikipedia is NOT a list of trivia. --Joeblack982 07:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Less obvious if one has not seen one or the other. If you think this page has too many facts, you should read the trivia section in The_Snuke episode. Applesanity 07:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

This stuff should also be added to the 300 article in a proposed new section on 300 in Popular Culture or something to that effect. --164.107.223.217 14:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Information in multiple sections

My compliments to the editors who have written one of the better articles on a recent South Park episode. The synopsis is relatively short and not too detailed while the "trivia" sections are pretty solid. However, there are a few topics that are mentioned in multpile sections: "...Again", ~~ese~~ (Ah, someone removed it as I was typing this), and scissoring. Shouldn't these topics be mentioned once in the article? Hoof Hearted 13:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Note that I was complimenting this version of the synopsis, which is now starting to bloat with details Hoof Hearted 14:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Everything looks pretty good. Bang-up job to the contributors. I could be wrong, but is this first time that we find out Mrs Garrison's first name or adopted first name? Maybe worth a mention. Gaijin84 15:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I also have to agree with Hoof a little bit with regards to the synopsis - some info needs to be trimmed down. Gaijin84 15:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Even with the bloating, this is one of the better South Park episode articles. Good work. Gdo01 21:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, well I'm going to be bold and remove "...Again?" from the Synopsis (explained more thoroughly in Continutity) and scissoring from the Lesbian references (the context in the Synopsis should suffice). Hoof Hearted 13:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Symbols on Xerxes

Hey, does anyone know that symbol on Xerxes' headband? I'm figuring it has to mean something since the symbol is repeated elswhere, expecially on the Gucci-trimmed Hummer. Applesanity 02:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

You mean the incomplete double rings? Gdo01 02:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

yes, that would be it. Applesanity 04:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Don Imus

I swear to god, that woman with the WNBA jersey looks exactly like Don Imus and I don't understand why nobody seems to agree. I mean come on, look at the hair! It makes perfect sense as well. Don Imus..WNBA? Helloooo? Lilmul123 18:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

well actually, Don Imus has white hair and less body hair showing. --Xxhopingtearsxx 22:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mr. Garrison

Garrison is techniquely straight because in Mr. Garrison's fancy new vagina the surgeon tells him hes still a male but just with a mutulated penis. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.153.26.82 (talk) 06:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC).

Ha ha ha - hey, if straight people want to identify with Mr. Garrison, that's fine by me. I sure don't claim him for my side.Rglong 04:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Les Bos Cocktails.png

Image:Les Bos Cocktails.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Xerxes (South Park).png

Image:Xerxes (South Park).png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

BetacommandBot 16:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:This is les bos.png

Image:This is les bos.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)