User talk:Czolgolz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Noite
Aloishochwald (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC) AloishochwaldAloishochwald (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you by help improve my article.
[edit] VoiceOfOne
Changed my mind - it isn't worth it - Read the discussion on Voice Feminzation and AlexR userpage . I cleaned up most of the flame. Have a great life. You have a beautiful attitude!VoiceOfOne 22:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] FemVoice
FRC - Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment is one of the stages of dispute resolution.
If you have access to google use Dispute site:en.wikipedia.org as your search. Alex is trying to say that we are bad users. Check out the Dispute resolution sidebar for an overview of the process. Wikipedia:Negotiation was ignored as well as Wikipedia:Current surveys.
I am so agree with you! I have placed {{Calm talk}} on the top of the Talk:Voice_feminization and Talk:Cisgender to see if it will calm AlexR down. I will be ignoring the AlexR rants for now as every time I have tried to explain anything and use logic, it seems to infuriate him. ... and I almost forgot, did you know that for 'EVERY USER', if you are on their User: or UserTalk: page that you can go to the toolbox and click on "User contributions" to see everything that user has done? Talk to you in June. FemVoice 20:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey, it has been a long time since I posted. Seems that you have been having a quieter time without the problem. I checked the one article I updated, and it seems that most people find it ok, and have not made major changes to it. Now that everything has quieted down, maybe I will make some more changes. Again, thanks for your support. FemVoice 22:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Let it go
Of course. The reason I did not go to any groups was that I didn't like the fighting. I tried to reason - did not work. I even thanked him for all his effort, and was insulted. That was the last straw. So, for me - I just walk away. My father said if you argue with an idiot, and someone walks by - they just see two idiots arguing.
Besides - good wikipedians don't fight
FemVoice 05:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Someone agreed with me
I have someone that actually agreed with a change and reverted AlexR's rvv of what I did. I am ammazed! If you are curious see cisgender. FemVoice 21:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I am not 'Voice of One'
I am 'Voice ov One' of is my room-mate, who came away from here crying ov is me.
AlexR made her cry. She said that he was abusive and self centered. I figured she was wrong. So I logged in and created the account FemVoice and looked, researched, found it wrong and changed it. AlexR got mean. I tried to reason with AlexR. I found out I was wrong and she was right.
I think we spend too much time together because like an old couple, we can finish each others thoughts. But no, 'VoiceOfOne' says she will not get back on to this site. She really was the one to write the voice-feminization article. I will try to do the best I can with it and ask questions of her as I go but it would have been done already if AlexR had left her alone.
Take care.
FemVoice 04:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] If you are curious about what I have been up to
Thanks for looking at the merge. Still not 100% done, but it looks better over there. I can't think of anything that I need right now, but I will keep you in mind after I make a few more changes. FemVoice 05:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Walter Dean Myers
Thanks for your kind note. That article was listed at WP:MEA in the Literary Encyclopedia list, but you must have started it after the list was made. And a good start it was, too! Jacqui★ 14:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Catch-22
Hi there - we chatted before on the Catch-22 talk page about sorting the character mess out. I know you have been lookig at the pages I have updated, and as no one else as given an opinion I wondered if you would give yours (I ask only cos I know you are interested).
1. What do you think of the pages I have merged and updated e.g. Orr, Doc Daneeka, and Aarfy, ho do you think they could be improved in general. 2. I want to make an extra page detailing the timeline of the events in the novel - do you think it would work, be a valued page.
Cheers, please leave thoughts on my talk page, --Lethaniol 17:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Don't worry they are my own words (or more precisely I have cut and pasted the previous entries and then bulked it out with my own words). I have used a slightly modified template being recommended by Wikiproject Novels Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/CharacterArticleTemplate. I am glad you think I have may have pinched them from off the web - it suggests that they can't completely rubbish - though I admit they still need work. As for merging characters - I have made it clear on the talk page what I am doing - and as no one is complaining I am just getting on with it. I think careful merging will make the characters/storyline/plot much easier to access and understand - and highlight the most important themes. When you do get time, it would be much appreaciated if you could have a careful read through the new entries and correct or bring to attention if this template could be improved.
- Many thanks Lethaniol 09:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Muchas gracias
Hey Czolgolz, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, —Khoikhoi 04:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Catch-22 and Yossarian
Hi Czolgolz,
It is very lonely in Catch-22 world, and I feel I need someone to comment on the work I have done recently - in particular what do you think about the new Catch-22 article wikiproject novel template - anything that should be removed/added/expanded etc... And also what about the timeline in Yossarian's article - appropriate? Thanks in advance for any comments - hope you are enjoying the mid-terms. Cheers --Lethaniol 22:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] US Casualties of War
I take them from [1].
You're welcome. Sadly, you are right about the "forgotten war" statement... Warrior on Terrorism 20:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RE your comments on the Wringer Magic Trick
I prodded the article to try and get some attention from the community. It only has two actual edits (both made by you) and then the two templates. Since the verify note has been on there for nearly half a year without any sources being added, I decided to try a new tack. To be honest, I have never heard of this trick, and didn't find much about it in my various illusionist books. However, if it is as widely performed as you claim, it should be a piece of cake to find some sources. Regards, →Bobby← 14:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] you sneaky devil
by george czolgolz (how is that pronounced), but you are an attentive editor. i expected my malicious vandalism to last there for at least a day. we could use you in the fight against the wikipedian machine. join our revolution and you will be amply rewarded, with wine aplenty and all the slave-girls (or boys) you could ever want. meet me at old mystery creek to further discuss terms. yours cordially, Shazamftshaq 19:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Need some WP:NPOV help
Could you take a look at Talk:Iraq War? Your user name was mentioned in the discussion. --Timeshifter 22:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Looking for Alaska quote
I'm responding here at your request. Congrats on baby! Yes, I read the book completely, and I actually liked it--it is well written. But after reading it, I had the feeling it had been a bit of a waste of time as it did not really add anything to my life. Reading a book about some kids drinking and carousing and having their first oral sex and porn movie experience is not the most exciting thing in the world to me. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 22:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I just stumbled across this mini-revert war about John Green's book. If this continues I'm going to request arbitration. LegitimateAndEvenCompelling appears to be pushing an agenda -- the fact that his user name is a reference to his agenda makes his denials seem a little flat to me -- and this out of context Green quote is simply the wrong way to deal with the controversies about Looking for Alaska. --JayHenry 16:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks, Czolgolz, for putting it in context. Especially on a stub page, it's the right thing to do. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 06:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Oh, rereading this I just recalled your baby. Therefore, I will make an extra effort to still be firm but to use kid gloves with you. Your baby is more important than this stuff! --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 06:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Informal Mediation
I have accepted the mediation case involving Looking for Alaska, Michael L. Printz Award and John Green (writer). I am contacting all involved parties. If there is someone else who has been involved in the disagreement, please let me know so I can invite them to participate. I am currently reviewing all three pages and their talk pages. Please indicate if you accept my assistance on the case page. Cheers!! Vassyana 13:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Mediation has been accepted by all involved editors. The case has been updated. I have posed some questions at the case page. Thanks! Vassyana 09:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- A compromise has been proposed. Please review my suggestion and let us know what you think. Vassyana 07:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
The mediation has been closed. LEAC has said he's leaving the mediation and will be leaving the disputed articles. If you have any further questions, concerns or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Be well!! Vassyana 04:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Civil unions in South Africa
Hi I am a gay attorney in South Africa and lecture in the law of persons at the local university as well. The Supreme Court of Appeal in the Fourie descision, instructed parliament to change the Marriage Act. However, when it came to the crunch, the Marriage Act was left untouched and the Civil Unions Act was passed. The effect of the Civil Unions Act is that parties to a civil union have the same rights as parties entering into a marriage in terms of the Matromonial Property Act. The parties can elect to call the union a marriage or a civil union. Furthermore, in all legislation, except the Marriage Act, where "husband" or "wife" is mentioned, "same sex spouse" is now read into the legislation. I therefore stand by the assertion that South Africa has civil unions, although they are as close as damnit is to swearing, to a marriage. Regards Andrew massyn 19:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response, I was incorrect. If I were you, I'd include what you just told me in the article, as it lists SA as a same sex marriage country. You obviously know much about this, so you'd be a good one to bring the article up to date. Thanks for your response. Czolgolz 20:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- I will bring the Act home and do a comprehensive update. Best Wishes. Andrew massyn 12:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Mizzou
[edit] Requesting Page Protection
I saw on another article that you asked about how to request that a page be protected. I had the same question, and a nice wikipedian provided me with this: "You can send them either to WP:RFPP or to the appropriate subpage of WP:AN." I've just used the first link, and there are instructions there on how to do it. Hope that helps. croll 22:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Conservapedia
Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that if you're the same Czolgolz who was recently banned from Conservapedia, you might want to take a look at http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/ or http://www.rationalwiki.com. They are some small resources for analyzing and criticizing Conservapedia, so you may find them of interest. Thanks for your time. :-) --Lanfranc 22:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The News
Glad to be of service. Regards, Bolivian Unicyclist 23:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Unseen character
An article that you have been involved in editing, Unseen character, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unseen character. Thank you. -- Jreferee (Talk) 18:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi again...
Yes I mean the new one...I think you must have lots of knowledge about it...Jon Ascton —Preceding comment was added at 23:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi once again...
I appreciate your helping spirit...I think it's got lyrics that go mirror mirror on the wall..., it's by Rah Digga, she plays a part too, BTW....Jon Ascton —Preceding comment was added at 17:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A Canticle for Leibowitz
Czolgolz, I see you've shown some interest in the A Canticle for Leibowitz article in the past. I'm interested in bringing it to GA status soon and am soliciting your help. A number of revisions have been made in the past few weeks to position it for a successful nomination process. Would you mind reviewing the article and make suggestions/changes to assist in the process? Any assistance you can provide will be appreciated. Thank you.
Jim Dunning | talk 03:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Department Head Rawlings
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Department Head Rawlings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of Department Head Rawlings. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 07:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Russian Vet
About that Krichevsky is the veteran of the first world war, there are official data on the Internet. The information that all veterans of this war in Russia have died, has appeared unchecked. The same history was in France when two more veterans have found. Krichevsky, as well as S. Lucas, both F.Matthews, and J.Ross, have been called in army in 1917. Or it, you consider, not enough? Read the information in Russian. Boris Efims, as well as F.Matthews, did not participate in the first world war, but was in Red Army (as, for example, Matthews) before signing the Versailles peace treaty. Will suffice to be engaged in vandalism! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.66.246.102 (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Antarctic stuff
Me crazy? You're the guy whose namesake shot a president, don't forget. ;)
Thanks for the props - I'll keep on keepin' on. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 00:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Coretta Scott King Award
I've made some major revisions and added new source material to Coretta Scott King Award. I've also begun the somewhat mechanical process of adding Honor Book awards and Illustrators awards. If you want to chip in, please do so. See Talk:Coretta Scott King Award for more info. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Hey, thanks again for editing the Betsie ten Boom page. You have really made a big difference! OnFire4Jesus (talk) 12:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] UN Offensive, 1950
Instead of redirecting UN Offensive how about merging? --Megapen (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
The WikiChevrons | ||
Good job editing UN Offensive, 1950 Megapen (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC) |
How abut giving me a barnstar since I created the actual article?
Find some examples here [2] Than copy the code onto my talk page as I did to yours. --Megapen (talk) 20:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
If you enter the following code on my talk page I will get a barnstar {{subst:The Writer's Barnstar|message ~~~~}} --Megapen (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] heh heh
Sorry for notifying User:Cashusjay about the speedy deletion of Cashusjay even though you tagged it. I am using Huggle, and it didn't realize you already tagged the page. J.delanoygabsadds 20:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality tag?
Please give your reasons on the talk page of Beit Hanoun 2008 massacre. I am interested to know if it's the article contents or the title itself. --Al Ameer son (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- I see now that the Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident was named so after a dispute like this, so I'll just move it. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 00:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- I moved the article and removed the tag. Yes, whether it's called a massacre or a tragic accident, the fact is, a mother and her four young children were killed while eating breakfast. Unfortunately, this stuff happens in the Strip often, but it's unintentional for the most part. --Al Ameer son (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] speedy deletion tag
Maybe I can have more then a minute to work on a portal page? — Zaui (talk) 16:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind - somehow this got in article space instead of portal space. Sorry to bother you. — Zaui (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Olivia broadfield
I just wanted to say that I think I might have tagged this article myself for non-notability, it's very close to the line, but I felt that the multiple assertions of #10 under WP:MUSIC asserted just enough notability for me to leave this one. I do apologize for substituting my judgment for yours and, if you feel strongly about this tag, I probably won't argue. In the meantime I'm going to move the page to its correct capitalization structure. If you have any questions or comments, I'm at your service. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note, and I appreciate your understanding. I'm not sure if the Olivia Broadfield article will last, but at least I gave her a chance to address its deficiencies -- what happens next is up to her. By the way, since the content of "Boomalation" was "'boomalation is a word that is starting to spawn some intrest in one school. meaning is the reaction between diet coke and mentos", I felt -- oh, how shall I put it -- that the world could possibly keep turning if we didn't have a word to describe the reaction between Diet Coke and Mentos. Possibly I will soon be asked to explain why I deleted something that is the latest craze sweeping three continents, but I'll chance it ;-) Accounting4Taste:talk 01:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Presidents in casualties
I don't know. I did not start that. I only puted in the names i rememberd on the line other started. Only that.
Hanskarlperez —Preceding comment was added at 14:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok, you can delete it if you want, of course :)
Hanskarlperez 18:08, 26 May 2008 (Bilbao)
[edit] Sawing a woman in half
Thanks for your comment on my talk page. Unfortunately I don't have any free images or any easy way of getting some.Circusandmagicfan (talk) 06:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan
[edit] Smile!
{{SUBST:User:OnFire4Jesus/Signature}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi :) Just wanted to make you smile for a sec. OnFire4Jesus 20:09, 9 June 2008 (ET)