Talk:Cytotechnology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Re-Create

This entry was once deleted; I was not able to pull up previous content; hope this is a better stub and start. Comments welcome. Journalist1983 15:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I stumbled across this page while RC patrolling. I looked at the deleted revision and this definitely is better. But it also has some problems. It should state better how it is different from cytology. And the current 2nd para should be removed because it does not represent global perspective. And if possible, an attribution of the definition to a reliable source. That would prevent it from being deleted under CSD G1 (Patent nonsense) in the future. --soum talk 15:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
i will work on stating how it's different from cytology; will work on better sourcing and more global def. thank you for your help.Journalist1983 15:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Sure, no problem. If you need the text of the deleted rev, just ask. --soum talk 16:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Great. how do i get the deleted text? would be helpful to see. i made some changes, but much more work is needed. does dictionary.com suffice as a reference? also, is last para ok with u.s. ref, or should it come out altogether? thanks again. Journalist1983 18:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

The last para is okay, and the dictionary.com reference for the defn will suffice. But I am against one liner paragraphs, as the first three are. They should be stiched into a single paragraph.
As for the content, I can mail that to you. You have not set up email communication, go to preferences, specify an email id and allow sending mails. That way I can send you the mail but wont know your email id (untill you reply). Or you can send me a mail (mine is active, visit my userpage and in the left hand toolbox, there will be the mail sending link. I will know your email this way, however. --soum talk 19:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. will set up my email acct. Thanks for explaining. will do by tomorrow. meantime, i will combine graphs. i agree it's choppy now. Really appreciate the advice/criticism. Journalist1983 19:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)