Talk:Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is part of the Geography of Canada WikiProject (Discuss/Join).
	Saskatchewan Portal This article is part of the Saskatchewan WikiProject (Discuss/Join).
	Alberta Portal This article is part of the Alberta WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

	Geography Portal This article is supported by the Geography WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage on Geography and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Geography, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

{{reqphoto|in=Alberta|in2=Saskatchewan}}

[edit] Merge requests

Cypress hills interprovincial park is an ugly, article of copy-vio appearance that seems to obviously need a {{CapitalMove}} but there is currently a request that it be merged to Cypress Hills. That may or may not be a good idea. Cypress Hills is currently a nice article about the geography and landforms of the region. An article somehere about the unique "interprovincial" park should exist. http://www.cypresshills.com DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:48, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

The article should not be merged as it is it's own unique place, but it should have a {{CapitalMove}} tag as you said. Obviously it will need to be re-written if it is a copy-vio and cite a source. •Zhatt• 22:00, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I believe that you are right Zhatt. I should note that I cannot confirm it's a copyvio, it might just be written by a fan of the park. I cannot find an online source for it but it still does needs a good clean-up. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:10, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Looking at it again, it doesn't seem to be a copy-vio, just written by someone who is unfamilliar with Wiki conventions of style. It even has references directly in the intro. It mostly just needs to be rearranged into the right style. •Zhatt• 22:48, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I just did a slight clean up of the article. Much more work needs to be done! However, I agree with Zhatt that these two articles are talking about two places and should not be merged. Canadian popcan 19:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

There is an article about Cypress Hills Provincial Park, which is about the same location and in the same context (park). I believe that a merge would be appropriate in this case. By the way, the correct name for this park is Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park and so I am suggesting the CHPP page be merged to the CHIP page. BrianC 05:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)