User talk:CWii/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CWii     
|
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Welcome!
Hello, CWii, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 23:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)}} Please note the whole text above was added by a Template function. (User:Walter Humala/welcome noobie)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Removal of trivia
I'd removed it per a comment from another user as one item is inaccurate and the other lacks context. I'll try to work them back into the article at some point in the future—the article's been something of a project of mine—but for now I hope you'll understand my actions. Also, trivia is not intrinsically encyclopedic, nor are miscellaneous facts. If you'd like to integrate them into the main text, be my guest; otherwise, I'd appreciate it if you'd re-nix them. Doctor Sunshine talk 19:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks very much, Doctor Sunshine talk 20:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:3village.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:3village.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Moved
I've moved all the character information off the front page and onto its own article, where it can be a complete list of characters. - Yours truly, Superior(talk) 01:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:3village-Wikify.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:3village-Wikify.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Category:3VCSD Project Helper
Hi. I recently encounted Category:3VCSD Project Helper, which you created as a membership category for participants in the Three Village Central School District Wikification Project. In general, project membership categories are reserved for active WikiProjects, and not needed for personal 'works-in-progress'-type projects in userspace. Until such time as it does become a formal project (if you intend to pursue that option, I encourage you to have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals), would you agree to deletion of the category? Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 04:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Black Falcon (Talk) 22:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
re. That person you just reported...
Aah, OK, sorry 'bout that. I guess I'm just getting a bit slow on the ol' AIV :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- I used to - sacrificed it for pages that load the same day I click the link :P — Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I Dissagree
On Image:Realtimecrimecenterofficial.gif he licenses it as his own work. the correct license would be a fair-use license. Of course I'm no expert on licensing Compwhiz II 04:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- No evidence has been provided, not plausible reason to doubt the veracity of the uploader that this is in fact entirely his own work. If provided with some webpage, or claim by another party that this is their work, then perhaps the tag would be appropriate. Until then I assume good faith. JERRY talk contribs 04:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
 |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I've noticed you more than once in the last few days sending chronic vandals over to AIV. I'm always glad to see younger teens fighting vandalism rather than contributing to it - great job. Trusilver (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
Really, I'm always happy to see younger Wikipedians. I think that it's fantastic that you volunteer yourself to a task that really is a lot of work with not a lot of reward to it. My daughter is about your age and I see the benefits in her that working on Wikipedia provides, such as critical thinking, problem solving and communication skills. I'm glad to work with you, keep sending vandals to me :). Trusilver (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, thank you! I really appreciate it. I'm going make myself an awards userpage now :D. Full of Joy, Compwhiz II 20:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:3RR
Be mindful of the WP:3RR rule at the moment. I don't want you to breach it. I will protect the article if it carries on without discussion on the talk page. Woody (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- That doesn't look like vandalism to me. It actually is article building. I am reworking the page now. Woody (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:DFProd.png
Thank you for uploading Image:DFProd.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Saint Dane
I believe the edit by User:Pendragonreader you reverted here, was a mistake. It looked like vandalism, but if you see the previous edit a person had added the section over again, and had the section was in the article twice. Just thought I'd let you know. ~ Bella Swan 21:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
An award!!!1
Congrats! you should also get one for waiting the longest time for gmod lan partys lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.196.173 (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Block request declined
Hello. You reported 68.198.8.150 (talk · contribs) to WP:AIV noting "vandalism after final warning." However criteria #2 states:
| “ | The vandal is active now ... and has vandalised after a recent final warning ... "Recent" and "active" in this context means within the last few minutes | ” |
As this anonymous editor's {{test4}} warning was 701 days ago [1], I have declined to block this address for longer than 60 seconds. In the future please double-check that your vandalism reports meet all of the WP:AIV criteria first. Thanks, --Kralizec! (talk) 02:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Help!
Hi!
I saw that you had a custom signature and I was wondering if you could give me a hand. I'm trying to get my signature to look like this... DesertAngel but it's not cooperating!!
How should I enter this into my signature box to make it work? And do I need to check the raw signature box? Thank you so much :) DesertAngel (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- It took a little bit of tinkering, but it's working now. Yippee! Thank you. DesertAngel 00:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
User talk:76.213.150.5
I'm happy either way. He left the cute "goodbye" message on my talk page and anons get minimal blocks, so I didn't want to create more work for the admins. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 03:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
AIV
I know. WP:NOT#BURO. Will (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For reverting vandalism of my talk page.
Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 04:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
Archiving
Wikipedia:How_to_archive_a_talk_page-You should consider this for your talk page. Its pretty long! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 23:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know! It's all stuff that has been on my "back burner" ... and I am trying to sort through it all. I am making progress ... slowly but surely. If I archive stuff ... it will be "out of sight, out of mind" ... and then I would never remember to get to it. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC))
-
- Okay, I understand. Good luck in your future edits! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 23:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Thanks. I am trying to sort through all this stuff on my "to do" list. As you know, sometimes you have more time for Wikipedia stuff ... and sometimes, you have less. With the Holidays, and school, and all ... I recently had "less" --- and now I am tyrying to play catch-up! Thanks for the link on how to archive! (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 23:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC))
-
-
-
-
- I understand Completely about lack of time. I'm supposed doing a science report right now :P ! Anyway, if theres anything else you need don't hesitate to contact me! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 23:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Thanks. Will do. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC))
-
-
-
Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Compwhizii. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 13:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Bot
Is your bot approved? And, just so that you know, we already have two bots that clean the Sandbox. Dreamy § 21:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Reverting vandalism
Hey there :) . Thanks for helping out with reverting vandalism and keeping Wikipedia reliable. In the future, be careful not to double warn users, like you did here. I recommend adding Gracenote's amelvand script by adding importScript('User:Gracenotes/amelvand.js'); to your monobook. The script tells you if you reverted the last edit so you don't have to worry about double warnings. Thanks, Mønobi 23:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations
Congrats on the thousand edits. ;) DesertAngel 21:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.
"Mr. Charrington"
There is a link for a Mr. Charrington page in the 1984 template. Thus, I thought that I would create a page for this character.Sicilianshotgun (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
3RR warning
Thanks for the warning, but (assuming you're referring to the Shinigami article), it's not technically a violation. Very very close, but not within the 24 span. Nevertheless, I can't revert it again without it counting. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
ViperNerd talk
I'll edit my talk page as I see fit thank you very much.ViperNerd (talk) 03:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Edit war warning added to Edgarde's page. Should he see fit to delete it, I will feel fully justified to delete mine. Fair is fair.ViperNerd (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind, I think we worked all that out.ViperNerd (talk) 03:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mine will be archived in a month or three. I never delete anything, and have received a few retaliatory 3RR warnings in the past from angry revert warriors. The point of warning templates is to be informative and helpful, not be Scarlet letters or traffic tickets. WP:AIV checks edit histories for previous warnings, so page-blanking does not evade anything. / edg ☺ ☭ 03:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Right, but agree with me, he is acting like a kid right? Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 03:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
User: Granola lips
The reason I deleted it is because 1) that user is not blocked, 2) those templates were all placed by an IP vandal. If you'd care to do some hunting through the suspected and proven sockpuppets of Elspeth Monro (talk · contribs) and Rastishka (talk · contribs), you'll see a pattern if this IP adding in all kinds of vandalism, not to mention tagging accounts as indefblocked and proven sockpuppets when they're not. Additionally, I believe you mean well, but please see WP:DTTR. Cheers! Nobody of Consequence (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Vandalism
Wow, I've got to really thank you for removing that from my userpage............................................excuse me for a minute...........*leaves room*...............HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.....................I'm ok now.
Serously, thanks a ton for removing that from my page, I can't imagine what someomne would have thought if they came to my page during the five minutes that guy's insanity was "live." (did I say thanks for getting rid of that?) Anyway, I do have to admit I haven't laughed as hard as that in a VERY long time. Seriously, what is wrong with that guy?! All I did was remove this edit and give him a level 2 vandalism warning. (btw, that's kind of a retorical question) I'm sorry for going on like that, but I've never had my life threatened before (ok, maybe he didn't quite threaten my life, but hey...), but I found the experience quite entertaining. I've just got to say it again, I can not thank you enough for removeing that from my page and letting me know about it. Have a great day!! Regards. Thingg⊕⊗ 04:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Removing AfD messages
Hi. I just wanted to drop you a note to ask you not to remove AfD messages from articles until the AfDs are closed. When an article is legitimately tagged for speedy deletion, the admin who deletes it should close the AfD as well. If for some reason the reviewing admin should decide that the article is not a good candidate for speedy deletion, the AfD will likely be left to run its course. I happened to be reviewing Benefit of a Doubt when you edited it, so I did not miss that there was an outstanding AfD, but under other circumstances it might not have been properly closed.:) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Just wanted to point it out for the future. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Dominique Rustad
You beat me to it! :-) Ros0709 (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Madram
Hi Compwhizii, I notice you reverted Maram's edit to Alfa romeo spider alloy wheels where Maram removed the prod notice. You then left a vandalism warning notice on the user's talk page. Please note that authors are allowed to remove Prod notices from articles they create and it wasn't appropriate to label this as vandalism. It is only AfD notices that should not be removed. I have removed your vandalism notice from Maram's talk page. Thanks, Gwernol 01:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:Uw-userspace1
Hi, sorry me again. I notice you created Template:Uw-userspace1. Are you aware of the existing Template:uw-upv (and uw-upv1, uw-uypv2 etc.) which seems to duplicate yours? Unless yours has a distinct separate use, it seems to be unnecessary duplication. Thanks, Gwernol 01:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've gone ahead and deleted it. Gwernol 01:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
January 24
Compwhizii, the re-revert I made to I Am Sam was an accident, okay? I'm using User:Lupin/Anti-vandal tool, with "rollback" option. It is very clear that I accidentally clicked on rollback next to I am Sam. It re-reverted the bad edit originally made by 207.112.48.231 I was about to revert the vandalism by 207.112.48.231, but somebody else already did.
It was never my intention to create disruptive edits to Wikipedia. I know Wikipedia about three years ago. Always My goal in Wikipedia is to help fight back vandalism, so that's why I installed the anti-vandal tool. Why? Because I believe the tool would help find and revert vandalism easier. I recieved comments from other users, saying that I need to refrain from unconstructive edits, but it was accidental edits. The first one I got was from User:Elaich. When first made a major edit in Ed, Edd n Eddy, the alleged vandalism was meant to be helpful. I thought it was helpful, but literally, it was unconstructive.
Every user in Wikipedia is encouraged to be bold when it comes to editing articles. That's not vandalism. Sometimes, users say that some good edits are considered vandalism immediately. Just because good edits found in any particular article, does not mean they should be considered disruptive and harmful. Users have to realize that good contributions does not depend on perfection, and no history of vandalism. It's like creativity: it doesn't depend on proper spelling, flawless grammar, or even perfect artwork. So, there is no right or wrong answers.
I believe other users in Wikipedia shouldn't be afraid in updating pages because they might create harmful edits. It's not like someone's going to say, "You have to be perfect, or you will be blocked from editing." And I'm hoping this "be bold" on editing will encourage users to try to assume good faith when improving the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered. Thank you. --Healthykid (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Response
Sorry for writing a lot. I guess you're right, it wasn't a necessity to tell a huge story. I was a little bit overreacted when I read your message. --Healthykid (talk) 00:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
rv on Angle of view
Hey, why did you revert my addition of Angle of view to the AOV disambiguation page? It's a common acronym in photography, along with FOV for field of view. ǝɹʎℲxoɯ (contrib) 01:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- No worries! I've been a little trigger-happy too, sometimes :-) ǝɹʎℲxoɯ (contrib) 01:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
User talk:JonnyHop
Why were my modifications considered vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duke bean (talk • contribs) 11:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Compwhizii - I'm not really sure why you deleted all the citations I added to the Rubinstein article. They're accurate. If it's a style issue, please let me know, but otherwise I'm going to put them back.
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JonnyHop (talk • contribs) 03:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Your NPWatcher application
Dear Compwhizii,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
Alexf42 04:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
hi
Are you crazy I never did vandalism this page, you are making vandalism my page and in my edits —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mondo della moda (talk • contribs) 15:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Teleomatic
This person is removing most of the citations and has broke the 3RR rule on the the Hajj Amin Elahi page. He did the same edit 4 times in 24 hours. I have warned him many times, but he just throws all type of insults my way.--Octavian history (talk) 16:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
your edits to George Thompson (abolitionist)
I'm sure your deletion of my edits to the George Thompson (abolitionist) page, and the resulting automated message you left on my talk page were an honest mistake. Please see my edit summaries as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject_Persondata and WikiProject_Categories if you have any questions. Thanks Teleomatic (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
re: your warning notice on my talk page
Thanks for your notice, however, before giving such warnings you may want to look into the background of this on the article talk page in question and note that I have made good faith efforts to substantiate my edits. The editor who complained about my actions above on your talk page has avoided addressing the issues of validity I raised and repeatedly reverted my edits, putting back false citations into the article. Teleomatic (talk) 16:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
False info
Hi. you just reverted a change I've made. Care to explain why? 58.161.213.202 (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- It looked like you were inserting false info or promoting someone. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 16:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Alright. Sources:
So if you deem this enough for me to include two lines back in that original aricle, can you please revert your change? Otherwise, I consider this unreasonable of you. 58.161.213.202 (talk) 16:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Bot warning
It looks as if you are editing using an unregistered bot, or at least editing too fast to confirm the edits. You reverted your own reversion of vandalism at School Bullying: List of Actions. Please be careful. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Keiron Hobbs
I stated Keiron is gay, he came out in first look Hollyoaks, I can edit it again tomorrow can't I, when the episode airs. And also add him into the Fictional Gay Men Category. Yes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raintheone (talk • contribs) 18:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
You reverted my edit, it was true. Still it was removed, you know what I meant aswell. Raintheone (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Matchday Soccer
Compwhizii
Hi, recently you reversed an edit to the page Matchday Soccer that I made - I have to admit that I am no expert at editing wiki pages but as the world foremost expert in this field I thought I should give it a go - If I could I would just delete the entire article as it is wrong in almost every aspect - I should know as I designed and created the game and a simple google search on either my name or the game will confirm this. My name is Jon Ritman and I wrote a game published by Ocean Software in the eighties called Match Day (not Matchday). There is a mainly accurate article for this game under it's correct name Match Day Here is a copy of the short article and my comments to every line (my lines have JR> at the start):
Matchday Soccer is a soccer franchise created by Gremlin.
JR> No it was an Ocean title, if gremlin had attempted to publish a game called Matchday Soccer we would have had them in court so fast their 22 legs would never have touched the ground.
The first game Matchday Soccer was made in 1984 for most console in that time. It had a power bar for kick strength and was one of the first good football games. It had good graphics for its time and great ball control.
JR>> Whilst Match Day II (published several years later) did use the power bar (as far as I know this system has never been used elsewhere) Match Day did not.
It was followed up by a sequel Match Day 2 released in 1986. One criticism was the lack of numbers and had a bad screen contrast. The cover originally was planned to have Diego Maradona on the cover but Gremlin never actually approached him about this.
JR> Notice the correct use of the name this time, again this was a game I designed and programmed. As mentioned above this did have the power bar system. There were no plans to have Diego on the cover, the artist was just given the brief to do a soccer cover. He tells me he just found a magazine and used a photo in there to create a painting with - by chance I found out who that photo was a few weeks after it was released - it was none other than Gary Liniker and I only found out because a few weeks after MD2 was released a Liniker licenced game was released that used the same picture, fortuantly nobody noticed at the time or it would have been nasty. I have the original painting hanging in front of me right now.
Matchday Soccer may be getting a 3rd game called Matchday Football 2008 for the PlayStation 3, possibly being developed by SCE London Studio (The developers for SingStar). The game may only feature a League style Club Championship and a knock-out Cup called European Club Cup and Rest of World club Cup. The game may only feature around 30 clubs and 15 Countries. The game might be like Sensible Soccer, which also had a current-gen update. Matchday 08 will have the same style as Sensi with Big Heads or something like that.
JR> No idea where this came from, the franchise is dead and since anyone owning the name would have to pay me lots to use it I very much doubt they would bother - the current owner of the name is Infogrammes/Atari
The 3rd and possibly final Matchday Soccer is currently only a rumour, but may actually be in development.
JR> not even a romour :-(
I have made another edit to the piece, I hope you can leave it in this time You can see the covers on my website www.ritman.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.67.105.101 (talk) 18:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:HUG.
Kekeke. What are you doing reading this? GET BACK TO HUGGLE! :P · AndonicO Hail! 20:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Excactly. Whereas I read and respond to your messages through huggle. ;) · AndonicO Hail! 20:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's not very good though... I like the normal way better. · AndonicO Hail! 20:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Gah! You just beat me!!! AO hides under a rock in shame. · AndonicO Hail! 20:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- You beat me fairly regularly :P. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Neither of you beat me too often... which is a good thing. :( · AndonicO Hail! 02:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- You beat me fairly regularly :P. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Gah! You just beat me!!! AO hides under a rock in shame. · AndonicO Hail! 20:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalization?
I did not VANDALIZE the page for Bring Me Your Love, I simply added a link, a link to the MUSIC VIDEO OF THE FIRST SINGLE. What the hell? Why is that VANDALIZATION? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.5.200.68 (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
You have no idea what link I put up! If you would've actually knew what it was, you would've seen that it had EVERYTHING to do with the article.
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Did You Change Your Mind?
You said that you reverted an edit I made to United States Electoral College, but then reverted it back. Does that mean that you recognize that my edit was constructive? Next time ask me why I made an edit before undoing it. Thanks. --SMP0328. (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
You know you could have simply said it was Standard Policy. Instead you chose to be sarcastic. Sorry I disturbed you from your important work. --SMP0328. (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC) it was a statement of fact, backed up by a source. Can I put it back, please —Preceding unsigned comment added by GIVE YOUR MAMA SOME SUGAR! (talk • contribs) 01:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Unconstructive
I'm new to this, so not sure what is meant by this term - I am assuming it is just placing a comment with my changes. So I did just that to the Idaho article - hopefully it is worthy. Let me know - the change was made to reflect actual US Census bureau numbers. The original number for Idaho 2007 estimated population was way too high. Just trying to make it accurate.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Idaho" Felt (talk) 13:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Please explain yourself.
Can you please Explain to me why was I considered VANDALIZING this page? All that I did was add a better quality version of the album cover, because the other version wasn't the best quality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_%28Janet_Jackson_album —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen1108 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, maybe if you considered opening it, you would've noticed it was MUCH MUCH larger. And still, there are no grounds to consider that Vandalizing.
There are still no grounds whatsoever to consider making an improvement vandalism.
Copyvio image on Jimmy Page
It is not a good idea to restore these because it generates pointless extra work for editors monitoring these things—this process is not entirely automated, nor can it be—and while these images are in use they expose Wikipedia to potential litigation from copyright owners.
It has become standard operating procedure for some editors to upload new copyvio images immediately once the previous copyvio image is removed. I think it would be a good idea for editors watching these articles to make a point of not rewarding such tactics. / edg ☺ ☭ 00:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
LOL.
Yeah, I know. :) Check my edit count... *cough* · AndonicO Hail! 00:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean there wasn't any change article-wise? Not getting you... :/ · AndonicO Hail! 00:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now I'm really confused. :? · AndonicO Hail! 00:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- No... I've got a bit over 18,500. But... I've also made over 1750 edits today. :P · AndonicO Hail! 00:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Correction, only made 1726. And no barnstar. :P As for RFA, let me review your contribs quickly. · AndonicO Hail! 01:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'd oppose your RFA: you didn't give me a barnstar. :( Lol, just kidding. ;) I think you're on the right track, but you're far too new (practically just this month). And you'll have to do more than just revert vandalism... I added something to your to-do list that's probably one of the most important goals for a user to have. You might want to check out WP:XFD, WP:FPC, WP:REFDESK or a few other similar wiki-space areas as well; reason for this being that people who only fight vandalism usually burn out quickly... like me. I've made around 7K edits in a week, but I'm tired now. :P I'm not going to use huggle for a while... · AndonicO Hail! 01:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Correction, only made 1726. And no barnstar. :P As for RFA, let me review your contribs quickly. · AndonicO Hail! 01:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- No... I've got a bit over 18,500. But... I've also made over 1750 edits today. :P · AndonicO Hail! 00:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now I'm really confused. :? · AndonicO Hail! 00:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
It works for me... · AndonicO Hail! 00:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
Its not really usually worth it to post messages to IP talk pages. It wasn't me who made that edit - either someone sharing my IP address or someone who just had it before me and gave it up. -67.160.175.113 (talk) 01:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
favor
May I ask a favor. begining the moment you read this post please forget the past.
Certainly. Pdfpdf (talk) 21:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello
Hello, you said you like receiving messages, so I am leaving one, I like receiving messages too, so feel free to leave one. Cheers. Earthbendingmaster 01:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Message
Im editing an article, duncormick, my local village. im not a bot, i've been editing it all day, i only created it yesterday so there's lots of information im slowly entering. - hsdnalerio
Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 22:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Test
Template:Uw-userspace1
Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 22:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Dreamboat Annie and 71.35.160.176's edits
On what basis do you deem that 71.35.160.176's edits to Dreamboat Annie are either unconstructive or vandalism?
I find them to be neither; in fact, quite the opposite.
Accordingly, I have struck-through your posting on User talk:71.35.160.176.
Should you disagree, please discuss the matter with me on my talk page. (Or here, if you prefer.) Cheers Pdfpdf (talk) 12:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- You have not responded to my posting.
- If you agree that your posting on User talk:71.35.160.176 is inappropriate, then please remove it.
- If you do not agree, then please explain yourself.
- I await your prompt reply. Pdfpdf (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes i did read your comment but didn't respond to it. Remember people can make mistakes. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 00:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- You seem to be making rather a lot of them recently. Perhaps you need to put more thought into your actions?
- Also, when you do make a mistake, it would be polite to apologise to the people you have wrongfully accused.
- At the very least: If you agree that your posting on User talk:71.35.160.176 is inappropriate, then please remove it.
- Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
-
Apologies, as you probably know teenagers can be quite quick on the gun. Ether way i am sorry for any inconvenience Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 18:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Yes, you are right, I do know.
- However, once pointed out to them that their behaviour is unacceptable, most teenagers modify their behaviour.
- I am somewhat unconvinced by your statement "Ether way i am sorry for any inconvenience" when I not only see no signs of you modifying your behaviour, but see you continue your thoughtless behaviour.
- Further, twice I politely suggested you delete your unjustified and unsubstantiated accusations, but you did nothing.
- I will be more explicit: Your behaviour is unacceptable.
- Should you continue such thoughtless behaviour, you are likely to end up being prevented from editing WP.
- Please, put more thought into your actions. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Yeah, he did the same thing to me, reverted a change that was legit, put more thought into your actions, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.157.110.11 (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
reply
well thanks :D ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk. 18:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Asia
FYI. The Asia fanclub spamlinker re-spammed the article immediately after you removed the useless link. 156.34.219.240 (talk) 02:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
February!!!
- Well baby, in my part of this world we call this February!!! --86.45.218.232 (talk) 02:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- But why baby? It's false! Wrong! Not January! February baby! --86.45.218.232 (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Might want to take care to use more specialized warnings, or it results in confusion like the above with this user. The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Now wait a minute, baby! Look here! What about that, huh... baby? This used to be exclusively 2007 but did it divide in two for the New Year? No siree, baby! I'm getting a little confused with all this white paper! I need some clarity... baby! --86.45.218.232 (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well I suggest you take a little jaunt over to the main page, baby! Take a look at the headlines... for that is where my attention was drawn to all this business... baby!! --86.45.218.232 (talk) 02:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Why thank you very much, baby! I will pass it on, I will! Would you like a bite? I do believe it is DEE-LISH-USH even if I say so myself baby! I hope Mr Evil Spartan Baby is satisfied too! --86.45.218.232 (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- You're wrong, I lose? Why that's some screwed up system we got here, baby! Let me go get my screwdriver! I'll sort this mess out baby!!!--86.45.218.232 (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Why was I blocked, baby? What did I do wrong? I love you very much! Or at least I thought I did. Then my feelings. They got hurt as usual. What can I do to make it up to you? --86.40.198.112 (talk) 04:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- See how much love I have baby? Here, have this --86.40.198.112 (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Spam?
How is adding links to author interviews and product reviews spam? There are interview links on many of the genre author pages throughout Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt-M-McElroy (talk • contribs) 02:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
Hi, recently i tried reverting the vandalism that was done on the article Action. I had some problems reverting back to [5] because it says that there were too many intermediate edits. Can you please return the article back to its orginal form before the vandal vandalized it? Thanks! ^_^--DurzaTwinkTALK 03:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Asia (band) vandalism
Happy to - I have a report ready. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 04:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Asia (band)
Hi, sorry, I would have protected it more quickly, but this was my first one and I was triple checking policy (totally paranoid about screwing something up) and figuring out the interface. And thanks for the Rfa congrats. CIreland (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
re: Asia part 64.5
Wiki-justice prevails. I had a report into ANI. Appreciate the assistance! Thanks and have a nice day! noble anon gets on horse and rides outta town :D 156.34.220.66 (talk) 04:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- You're giving me a complex :D . 156.34.220.66 (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
re Hey you
Had me worried there for a second :) By the way, the reason I can revert so quickly is all down to WP:HUGGLE - it's the best vandalism fighting tool I've ever come across. Still in development at the moment but I haven't found many bugs, so hopefully it'll be more widely available soon. Meanwhile, sorry to be annoying!! Waggers (talk) 21:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- If it's any consolation, Gurch keeps beating me to reverts too! Waggers (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
um
So its ok for him to be racist? - timbaland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.255.52.182 (talk) 03:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- How? - Timbaland
revert
why did you revert the edit? I placed in referenced material. it is not vandalsim. please don't edit war. 66.152.198.210 (talk) 03:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
and this is? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_Day_Parade#Controversy 66.152.198.210 (talk) 03:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
here is another http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Indian_Day_Parade#Violence 66.152.198.210 (talk) 03:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
so fix it don't revert and delete. now that i answered your question you can fix it! 66.152.198.210 (talk) 03:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
well don't violate it. you seem to have wanted to not listen to reason. so i made a report. fix the article and i'll remove it . 66.152.198.210 (talk) 03:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating 3RR on Dominican Day Parade. Since the changes in question were clearly not vandalism (as shown by the user's use of cites and his attempts to discuss the matter here) your reverts were part of an edit war. This edit shows you were aware of your violation but chose not to revert yourself despite having been given several hours in which to do so. Everyone gets carried away sometimes, but it's important for you to understand the difference between vandalism and a content dispute.
I know you're a quality editor and this is your first offense - if another admin wants to lift the block early they can feel free to do so without asking me; I will not contest it. Whether the block runs its course or expires early, please remember: there are no emergencies on Wikipedia. Sometimes warnings are warranted, but sometimes (like this time) disagreements call for genuine discussion. Apologies, Kafziel Take a number 07:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
You're a good contributor to the project, and based on your comments on IRC, you seem to have a better understanding of the 3 revert rule. If you find yourself in another dispute, take a step back, and remember what User:Kafziel said; Don't panic. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 16:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Reply
Dear Compwhizii, the reason why I decided to leave Wikipedia is because I just receive an e-mail from Dkendr saying that I'm a serial meddler that if I continue to alter people's work based on your my own opinion of what is "constructive," I'll be banned from editing articles. I thought it would be safer to forget Wikipedia and try to edit my own work. Here's the message:
You are incorrect to revert my edits; you do not have the right to decide what is "unconstructive," and it appears that you are a serial Wikipedia meddler. I have therefore restored my edits to the Eric the Midget page as you had no right to revert them. Should you continue to alter people's work based on your own opinion of what is "constructive" I will petition to have you banned from editing articles. People like you give Wikipedia a bad name. I strongly urge you to take up another hobby.
Maybe he's right, I am a meddler, and I don't really know how to make constructive edits. I really should take up another hobby. And I'm not experienced on contributing. --Healthykid (talk) 15:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Note I can still edit my talk page :) Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 15:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Remember it takes time. And editing articles isn't the only thing you can do to help Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 15:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
User_talk:Sanhealy
Hello. Apologies if I'm teaching you to suck eggs, but there's a useful warning template for warnings when users remove speedy tags from pages they have created - uw-speedy1, 2, 3 and 4. Amongst other things, it's useful because it tells the user the process to adopt if they want to keep the page. Thanks! gb (t, c) 20:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. You could always go a bit "old school" and type them, like we poor sad Mac-users have to! gb (t, c) 20:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
VANDALISM?????
How is insert the CORRECT information in an article vandalism..J Greb kept reverting valid edits becuase he didn't read the issue of Ulitmate Secrets which confirmed the identity of Ultimate Taranutla so I posted a link to the entry of ulitmate Tarantula. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.141.241.71 (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
The Giants Win
Okay, I'm really angry. I am not affiliated with any team. All I want is to tell people who won and by what. SO WHY AM I GETTING WARNED ABOUT THAT?!? The game ended like minutes after, and I'm being told I can't say anything. What's the problem?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Playhacker (talk • contribs) 03:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Playhacker's edits
How is this vandalism? The edit was not grammatically accurate, but it was a good-faith edit. Please be more careful when giving warnings to users. Playhacker was a good-faith editor who added nothing but meaningful content to Super Bowl XLII. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
i totally agree with nishkid. how the heck was that vandalism?? it doesnt matter if hes not using correct grammar, someone will fix it. i think you went just a little overboard with your warning...ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk. 20:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Reply to your message
Could you please explain how my edits were vandalising? I was merely restoring the page to how it was before other user's edits. Nothing of what was included in my most recent edit was defamatory or untrue. I had references to back up any points. Please note another user yesterday removed much of the marketing style language used by the users Weatherstone and IngleburnProtector, which IngleburnProtector has now added back. I do not think Wikipedia should be used as a marketing gimmick as InlgeburnProtector is obviously trying to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OzWoden (talk • contribs) 01:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- I think you should respond at his talk, his edits were good faith.--Antonio Lopez (talk) 03:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Message
I would just like to second what has been said above. Compwhizii, please read carefully what other people have written before reverting, accusing others of nonconstructive edits (look before you leap (my CS edit)). And sorry if this is in the wrong spot, don't really post messages often. And thanks for changing my edit back. --64.230.4.64 (talk) 01:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Votes at AfD
Please just use a bold delete, keep, or whatever, but not the graphic heavy format you've been using. It breaks the flow of AfDs. I'm putting the template up for deletion as well. Pairadox (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism reporting
Please read Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism. This edit was not vandalism; even if it was, the editor had received no vandalism warnings at all and so there was zero chance of a block being imposed. Three editors, including me, agreed that this was a bad report (see here. Regards, BencherliteTalk 01:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, a Hug Bug. Not a device I use (I'm a Twinkle fan myself) but I've seen the odd note about script problems. Sorry if my message before was a little terse. Regards, BencherliteTalk 01:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Please pay better attention
before accusing me of vandalism maybe u should look at the edit, on the katherine mansfield page i was correcting the link to ensure it connected to bohemian in the sense it is meant in the article, mansfield was not a bohemian in a geographic sense rather she was a bohemian in terms of the social movement sense thus by reverting my edits you are in fact the one vandalizing the article not me
remember: if you dont know what you're doing dont judge others thank you
signed because author didn't Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Block Warning regarding personal attacks?
I'm sorry I'm very confused as to why I'm getting a warning on personal attacks. Did I do something wrong or was it issued by a bot or something? I copy/pasted some comments to another editor (maybe moderator?) to explain a situation but nothing in what I said was a direct attack on banray, I was just explaining a situation to him and asking for advice on how to handle such a situation. If it was something other than this post could you please explain to me? FantajiFan (talk) 08:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for clearing that up FantajiFan (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Overzealous?
You might be a little overzealous on reverting anon edits and warning the anons. Case in point: User:99.241.48.112, whose edits to Katherine Mansfield were an improvement to the article. I realise that working vandalism patrol is stressful, and sometimes you can press the wrong button by mistake, but why did you remove a posting to my talk page?-gadfium 02:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'd already fixed that, and that isn't a reason to remove a genuine attempt to communicate.-gadfium 03:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Reverts of my edits to spider
I would be very interested in knowing why You consider my edits to the spider article unconstructive. I provided full explanations for both in the edit summary. The first was the removal of a nonsense comment that 60 cm spiders exists (!!!), which also had a request for references attached, and, as noted on WP:REF, it can therefore be removed (which only seems sensible when dealing with such comments that so obviously are way off). Of note that this claim evidently was vandalism, as evident by the directly following edits by the same editor (this and shortly after this). My second edit to that article was a warning regarding a photo where someone handles a Brazilian wandering spider - something that no sensible person should do (consider checking the specific wiki article if not familiar with this group) - a warning was therefore only fair in my opinion (just in case someone without knowledge of this genus of spiders were to see it, and get a mistaken idea. Wikipedia might not be censored, but you still can't find bomb-making descriptions on it!). Regardless, I would be very interested in knowing why my edits were reverted, and do hope you will seriously consider restoring them. Thanks. 212.10.93.196 (talk) 03:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've re-added the edit, as I, based on the amount of edits you've made over a short period, can see that you're a pretty busy wiki editor, so I presume the revert of my edit simply was a mistake. I have, however, also changed the photo of the Brazilian wandering spider to a photo where the issue of someone foolishly handling this dangerous species isn't an issue, and as such the warning below the photo can be left out. Should there be anything you disagree with in that edit, I do hope you will add a response here. Otherwise I presume the earlier revert was a mistake (... it happens, no prob.). 212.10.93.196 (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Moved message
Dear Wizz Person- I dont know what your problem is, but you have re edited the Christmas tree Lane page to be inaccurate. I happen to be the Lane Historian and have only corrected the glaring innacuracies on the page that anyone from Altadena would recognize. How is it that you believe you are more qualified than I to tell the history of the lane? Do you have the slightest idea of the long History ofg the Lane or Altadena? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.22.66.54 (talk) 03:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Dm0.jpg already exists
Image:Dm0.jpg is already within the article. You cannot protect him forever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lg saint (talk • contribs) 01:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Safety statement
Whoops, you just added back a copyvio. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- No problems. It took a while to find that one though. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Level 3????
hit the Carly Corinthos page again but I don't know how to do a level 3 warning. Could you? I've reverted the edits. Thank you. KellyAna (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Dumble Amplifiers
Please do not delete the Youtube link to Henry keyser and Alex. Dumble. This is not a copyright violation. Henry posted the video for educational purposes and has placed no restrictions on its use. WP guidelines only prohibit links to copyrighted materials - not all links. There are at least six robots out there at work automatically deleting all Youtube links, when it is not actually Wikipedia policy to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottie1492 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Message
Please stop messing around with the page im creating. Im not vandalizing it, im constructing it. You cant delete something or accuse it of being vandalized without it even being completed. Im the founder of the Flat String Music record label and I would like to make a page for reference. Please remove the speed deletion tag and let me continue my work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalstyle (talk • contribs) 23:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Then how am I suppoed to finish my page then? If you or somebody else is just going delete it? Go to www.myspace.com/flatstringmusic, its all real and all of the information is right there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.124.161 (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
Please be more careful with your rollback tool; here you restored vandalism to an article that an IP had removed. I see this does not appear to be an isolated incident either given the discussions above - if you continue to rollback constructive edits, your rollback permissions may be revoked. :/ krimpet✽ 23:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it seems you have been continuing to rollback constructive IP edits, even within the period of the last few minutes; I have removed your rollback permission, and disabled your access to the tool Huggle for 48 hours. Please be more careful in the future; rollback is not to be used on constructive edits. :( krimpet✽ 00:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Youtube Poop
Is there any particular reason why it should be removed, or are you removing it just because it has "poop" in its title?
As I said on the talk page, none of that section is of any way vandalism at all. You can search on YouTube yourself for proof, or visit http://www.youchewpoop.com for the official site. 85.232.209.158 (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
*
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Your reports to AIV have been amazing. Nice job. Malinaccier (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC) |
Unconstructive?
Did you mean to do that? According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools#What not to include, trivia of interest only to pupils is not to be included. The page is tagged for being written like an advert, so my edit were in good faith. 66.57.187.101 (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Can you please respond to this? These were clearly good-faith edits and shouldn't have been reverted with the rollback tool. Hut 8.5 21:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, about to now. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 21:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Done Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 21:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, about to now. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 21:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
Please take into consideration the validity of my edits before blindly accusing me of vandalism. If you disagree on the content I have added, then lets discuss on the talk page of the article. I found it interesting that your talk page is filled with comments of people who think you have accused them hastily of vandalism... seems like you have a bit of a history of this. 71.65.254.179 (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- re: "Wikipedia does not belong on that list." Do you have anything else to say? Your assertions are meaningless, please qualify your statements. 71.65.254.179 (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Please take a loot at Troll (Internet) again and the talk page and let me know if this is kosher with you. Thanks. —Memotype::T 05:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- re: "Wikipedia does not belong on that list." Do you have anything else to say? Your assertions are meaningless, please qualify your statements. 71.65.254.179 (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
re: Tool or no tool
I don't believe they should... just a difference of opinion I guess. Back when I was still an "account" I was a VandalProof user as well as popups and Lupins tools etc. I was very diligent that I did not use any vandal tool to revert an edit that caused a link error or went against known consensus or anything else that wasn't clear vandalism. For those rv's a correction with a proper edit summary was more appropriate. I have zero tolerance for vandals and trolls. But I can AGF a spelling mistake and not use something like popups to rv... because I think that's ill use of the tools. It makes not difference to me now. After I rolled over 20000 edits I abandoned my user account for the purity of anonymous editing. Which means that now... I have no tool :D don't tell Wiki alf that I said that... he'll never let me forget it Have a nice day! 156.34.213.177 (talk) 23:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
hello
hi, you don't have any work to do?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.135.107 (talk) 23:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
speedys
Please read WP:CSD. Schools can not be deleted via speedy A7 for lack of notability. Only those categories of things specified can be speedied via that rule.DGG (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
User 71.122.222.95
Hello, Compwhizii.
I noticed that you're reverting 71.122.222.95's edits on the Talk:Czechs page. I took a look and I think that his edits are well-intentioned but misguided attempts at cleaning up the page. Continually reverting them may not be the best way to settle this, as his edits appear to be made in good faith.
Thanks, Sandy of the CSARs (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for 3RR
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
-- Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Just me testing a tool out :) Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- One sec I'm trying to find it again Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- User:Adam1213/warn. <--- There it is! Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
Popups glitch: You or the script?
Hi! I just noticed this reversion[6] you made a few minutes ago. Is there something going on with Popups? I think it's supposed to be putting values into those $x placeholders... Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 02:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the back-up. Anti-anon editors are everywhere in Wiki. Sometimes, unfortunately, they show up in admins too... even if only for a brief edit or tw0. Trust me... in my 50000+ edits here... I've seen it all. Thanks again and have a nice day! 156.34.215.201 (talk) 02:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
OfficialLark edits
You (and another editor) submitted OfficialLark (talk · contribs) to WP:AIV as a vandal. It looks to me like a new user struggling to edit. Am I missing something? —EncMstr 02:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at :User talk:Truco9311#b1tch, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Was this necessary?
regarding Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research
Please read this version of it. Also please note how it says: Do not edit this page until an administrator has resolved this issue.
To write a new article without infringing material, follow this link to a temporary subpage. State that you have done so on this article's discussion page. Note that simply modifying copyrighted text is not sufficient to avoid copyright infringement—if the original copyright violation cannot be clearly identified and the article reverted to a prior version, it is best to write the article from scratch. An administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
It doesn't appear you are an admin. If I am wrong, I apologise.--Rockfang (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar!
 |
The Original Barnstar | |
| You have overall great edits, excellent hold on Wikipedia policies, nice anti-vandal work, and some nice mainspace contributions. After all, that's what Wikipedia is about. Keep up the good work! Soxred93 | talk count bot 22:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
E-mail.
And I expect a reply (if only to slow you down on huggle...). · AndonicO Hail! 00:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Edit Conflict on Talk Page
I recently was warning the same user you did regarding the article Strontium. I think my edits may have overwritten yours. Sorry about that.
PseudoOne (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Greek citron Talk Page
You reverted may edit, since I didn't write the reason for it. It is because the problems are solved so there is no need for the old requests to be diplayed. Pleae tell me if I'm wrong. - Critisizer (talk) 02:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I'm gonna have to give you another one after helping me sort out that whole ordeal with the vandalism on my userpage. Wow...Malinaccier (talk) 23:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much for the barnstar! Best, Keilana|Parlez ici 02:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
ZOMG!
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For serving in the February 16 vandal attack (and RVing like a jillion edits), I, Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ, award you this. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 21:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
Seeking to know a better reason as to why you reverted my edit...
To my own comments on the Jackson talk page? Since I made them the article has been revised anyone reading that would still assume I was reffering to the current page. In fact, I even labeled my edit so, DON'T revert it again. Are you just being a pedantic hobbyist wikipedian with too much time on your hands, as most of your talk page indicates? OoohOoohAaah (talk) 21:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
2002 Bali bombings
Is this a robot account? If it is then it might be malfunctioning. Why are my edits considered vandalism? --70.21.26.190 (talk) 01:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Tommy Shoyama
I am not sure why you would say my edits were not constructive, as I just started and wrote all the text for the page. I then asked for formatting help, which I have received. Your comment seems quite rude. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for reverting these edits on my user talk page! Your help is appreciated. --dionyziz (talk) 02:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC).
