Portal talk:Current events/2008 May 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] May 30

Current events of May 30, 2008 (2008-05-30) (Friday) edit history watch

[edit] ITN Candidates

Note: The 2008 Sichuan earthquake discussion has been moved to May 29.--Pharos (talk) 23:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Note: The May 2008 Colombia earthquake discussion has been moved to May 26.--Pharos (talk) 23:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

  • TACA Flight 390 appears to be adequately filled out and referenced to merit inclusion. - BanyanTree 01:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Posted, after allowing time for people to chime in. - BanyanTree 22:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
I added a citation to the updated content and posted this. Please make sure that candidates have referenced updates. Thanks, BanyanTree 00:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
So with this new system, are people too lazy to write out an entry? -CWY2190(talkcontributions) 02:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
No. It's supposed to be written in that day's Current events box (the box immediately above if you're reading this on WP:ITN/C). This nom isn't formed properly.--Pharos (talk) 03:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
So this but not anything else...Mathcounts, National Geographic Bee... ? I'll still support. SpencerT♦C 15:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
The trial system seems vulnerable to having nominees removed from the current events page by editors that don't like stories. Never was an issue with the old system, sigh --Lemmey talk 16:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Well that's easily solved--just have nominators rewrite them here. By the way, I oppose mentioning the spelling bee, which is of little interest even in the United States. The Mirko Norac story is much more significant. Mangostar (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
The Mirko Norac one is not that bad. Alternatively I could see the Texas polygamist child custody one, it's not that significant but an ongoing story and we could link the relevant articles nicely. Hobartimus (talk) 18:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
I consider this to be more of a "sporting" story - along the lines of the seemingly endless types of football that get posted to ITN, so am not against it. But I would hold off on this to see if the article, which actually seems to be 81st Scripps National Spelling Bee, becomes better formed. It currently has a lot of single sentence paragraphs and very few citations. - BanyanTree 00:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)