Talk:Culford School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-Importance within Schools.
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Culford School article.

Article policies

some alumni nice pageVictuallers 18:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


NOTICE TO ALL WHO EDIT THIS PAGE: Unless this page is edited constructively, ie NOT removing relivant facts, NOT replacing the original authors unconcealed opinion with your own and NOT cutting sections of text without making necessary grammatical corrections to the rest of the sentance, it will be replaced by the GRAMMATICALLY AND FACTUALLY CORRECT version. Perhaps, FDC (and Viva) instead of cutting the article to stop you looking bad, you could do something amusing to make you look good.

The current head of the Fifth Dinner Club is one Giles Dixon, who's initiation left him feeling rather unwell for a number of days!

TO ZZUUZZ : -- the reason this is unsourced is that no sources exist other than the knowledge of the pupils of culford school. Perhaps, instead of removing a section a number of pupils have co-edited to ensure accuracy and impartiality, you could respect the fact that impartial sources cant and wont exist for this.

Thank you for confirming that this section didn't adhere to Wikipedia's policies. If there is no source then it shouldn't be here. Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 17:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I hardly see how this doesnt conform to Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia is an repository of all human knowledge. the 5thDC & Viva section is not only factual, but entirely relevant to the school. I hardly see how sources come into it - many have done their utmost to ensure that it is totally accurate, as well as fluent.

later edit: looking back on the page, I notice that the entire article is unsourced, yet you dont remove that. Why? because it is all true and you have no reason. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WookieLord (talkcontribs).

There is a presumption that most of the article could be verified by reliable sources, given enough time and concentration. The section on this club is not only extremely unlikely to be sourced, ever, but it also alleges criminal acts and damages the reputation of the school. It's pure unremarkable vanity and should be removed. -- zzuuzz(talk) 13:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
yah ok whatever, you win... tho for ur information im not a member of either of them, so accusing me indirectly of vanity wont get u anywhere... WookieLord

For all information about citations of information provided in ANY Wikipedia page, please look at the following link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources Paulman 15:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)