Talk:Cuff link
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Cuff link is part of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Gemstones, Jewelry, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, jewelry subpage. | ||
|
WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry To-do:
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Mid | This article is on a subject of mid-importance within fashion. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
Merged with silk knot.[[User:Zhengfu|Zhengfu (talk)]] 15:37:58, 2005-07-27 (UTC)
All that talk about iKuffs looks a lot like an advert to me.
Seconded. Astroturf!
This page has quite a lot of information, yet the article on cuff is almost blank - Matthew238 02:18, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
22/2/07 It would be good to see some more seperate articles on the cufflink designers.
[edit] Photograph
The first photograph should be replaced: it is a grave sartorial solecism to wear cufflinks with single cuffs...
[edit] Contradicts another article
This article says that silk knots are made from Turk's Head knots, but the article for Monkey's Fist knots says the same thing. Which is it?J.J. Bustamante 22:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article becoming an ad
This article seems to have a constant habit of turning into an ad. originally it was through people adding "external links" to retailer websites; now there's a section saying "leading retailers of cufflinks are...". i dont think we need a list of retailers for cufflinks in an encyclopedia. it seems like a silly ad.
I'm gonna go ahead and "be bold" and delete the lot. I'm posting here to make it very clear that I'm doing this so that someone can reverse if it they feel it's inappropriate to delete it. however, please post here with your justification if you plan to reverse my deletion (Otherwise i'll just assume it was an advertiser who did it and we'll end up in an edit war) Hugzz 22:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
