User talk:Cuddly girl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lorna Fitzgerald, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lorna Fitzgerald was changed by Cuddly girl (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-11T22:18:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 22:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Ln of x (talk • contribs • block log • [http://en.wikipedia.org../../../../articles/l/o/g/Special%7ELog_01d8.html).  As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

- Philippe | Talk 22:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Well unfair. As I have tried to explain there was NOTHING wrong with my edits, so what "original offense" are you on about. I've had to use sockpuppets in order to edit wikipedia and defend myself - if you hadn't blocked me for no reason then I wouldn't have had to"

Decline reason: "Abusive sockpuppetry is unacceptable. — - Philippe | Talk 01:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.