User:Cubedmass

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Cubes "Mathematics has since the time of ancient Greece, been a set of variances of agreed scale to calculate the number of singular item of use to the commercial environment, even the Romans had no use for 0, nothing or not worth anything. Why then is there a need today for any other type of mathematics, well no longer are we limited by the use of the human brain for our ability to recall knowledge, we have at our control the ability to program a system of electrical impulses to enable a Knowledge retrieval and calculation system called a computer via a system of knowledge retrieval information pods called the internet, to store unique pieces of Knowledge relating to unique areas at unique times. It is this unique singular ability that will take us to another system of calculation, “compound mathematics”. This is the ability to use the unique singular knowledge about any unique area of space at any unique singularity of time, to justify the next event in that unique area of space in the next singularity of time. It is the interaction of the compound effect of the changes caused to these unique areas of space by other unique areas of space over a series of singularities of time that along side the basic principal of physics will become a fresh approach to Calculate the evolvement of knowledge. So how do I justify this claim, for many years I have been trying to justify the ability, to fit a cube in a square. Infact my entire life has been trying to achieve this impossibility. Yet, Albert Einstein tells us in one of the greatest scientific human achievements of all time “The splitting of the atom” that Energy is Equal to the mass of light squared."

Perhaps if I was an academic person I could understand the basis of this equation better, but I am not an academic. I consider myself a practical person and earn my living not from theoretical theories but my ability to turn ideas into actual practical useful objects. It is this practical perspective of the laws of nature that have given me so much trouble with Mr Einstein Equation. A mass by dictionary definition must be, Lump – a body of matter that forms a whole but none definable shape. Collection – a collection of many individual parts. Great unspecified Quantity – a large but unspecified number or Quantity. Physics physical quantity – the property of an object that is a measure of it inertia, the amount of matter it contains, and its influence in a gravitational field. Symbol m. The problem I have is how you can put a mass in a square. A dictionary definition of a mathematical square “the produce of multiplying a number or term by itself”.

In the practical world I live in any number multiplied by itself must produce an area, and because it has no third dimension. This area cannot even have a surface, because to create a surface you require three dimensions. How does a non-academic practical person, tell a world of academic physics masters. That the most famous equation in the World, E=Mc2 is fine if you are looking to justify the “current situation”. But this must lock you into the present situation where you have only one fixed set of variance. Somewhere between a super nova spewing massive amounts of matter from a magician’s hat, to a matter gobbling black hole putting it back into the magician’s hat, but unable to explain “WHY”. Hence a singularity. “ONE EVENT”. So how can we take the singularity of this one event to another horizon. simply by taking energy to the point its velocity is equal to the mass of light cubed. you will not only discover your missing "dark matter" but find a path through the wormhole of your current impass.--Cubedmass 17:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The difference between mathematics & compound mathematics is:-

The mathematics we currently use is limited by its singular start point of 0. This means that however complex the calculation being worked on, its answer must be fixed by the preset formula being used to take it to a preset point away from 0 within the singularity of the preset variance being used. With compound mathematics you have no preset start point. This means no calculation is set within a preset variance, its variance will come from its own density and size (Dominant mass to velocity ratio) being compared to the Principal mass to velocity ratio or subordinate mass to velocity ratio. This in simple terms means its variance will come from its relationship to a larger and smaller Mass to velocity ratios within the unique area of space they occupy at that unique moment in time. So how does having no preset start variance help:- With our current mathematical practice every calculation must start from 0 and then via a preset variance it is altered by the numbers of reference points the calculation involves to a point where we are presented with a answer preset by the formula's used. This answer can only be correct if the formula's used have accounted for every possible variation that could occur. As at this point in time we have no idea of what effect time and space have on mass over the course of time. The answers we are getting must be fixed within the singularity of the preset variance. With compound mathematics you are not fixed within a preset variance:- Every compound mathematical calculation will take into account the effect time and space has on mass over the course of time. How can this be done, in fact its very simple, instead of one fixed start point 0, you will have a start point that is as infinity Variable as the three dimensions of space subdivided buy the measurement of time. (Note:- Compound mathematics does not see time as a dimension but as a simple reference point or measurement of the constant interaction between differing mass to velocity ratios.) How does compound mathematics work, in fact its very simple :- Every element in the periodic table has a unique atomic structure, weight, density, melting point, boiling point, energy structure. Every element in the periodic table, because of its unique singular structure will react differently to the unique singular structure of every other element on the periodic table. Every element in the periodic table will require a different level of energy or velocity to create a change to its elemental structure in every environmental condition. What causes the unique interaction between elemental structure, again its very simple :- Every elemental structure will hold a unique amount of mass that in turn will hold a unique amount of energy or velocity. The amount of mass or velocity held by every element in the periodic will depend entirely upon the environment it is contained within. So what does this unique structure offer compound mathematics :- If every element in the periodic table has a unique atomic structure, weight, density, melting point, boiling point, energy structure and every element in the periodic table, because of its unique singular structure will react differently to the unique singular structure of every other element on the periodic table. Then this unique elemental structure can be measured against every other Unique elemental structure. Not only this but :- Every elemental structure will hold a unique amount of mass that in turn will hold a unique amount of energy or velocity and in turn the amount of mass or velocity held by every element in the periodic will depend entirely upon the environment it is contained within. So how will this help compound mathematics, well compound mathematics cannot work within the singular or within current mathematical calculation, because they can't operate within the fixed plain of singular or squared mathematics. They require a space that is defined as a cube to expand and contract as the interact with other eliments or environmential conditions. The interaction between Elemential structures within the cube will require another document Cubedmass 20:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

--Cubed or compound mathematics— Quantified or continuous time must be a major question to any mathematical question involving the relationship between space and time. For reasons I have explained earlier, I have a major problem with the current singular perspective of 0 with only the ability to use + or – to create the excepted scale of variance towards the answer you seek. Yes the current understanding of mathematics will allow numerious equations to be vectored in and this will allow very complex groups of physical and chemical changes to be calculated. But the time and space of your answer will always be fixed by the singular perspective of 0 and your + and - scale of variance, yes time can be added to your calculation but this must simply adjust the time that is fixed by your start point, + or – your vectored variation. Relativity tell us time is not fixed, and now actual experiments have proven this to be a fact, yes the variation is minute but the size is not important. What is important is the fact it has been proven that two objects travelling at speed at the same moment in time in the same unique area of space can create a variation in time. This observation must indicate time can’t be continuous. Why, well if two unique singular units of mass, can travel as unique individual bodies with unique velocity within the same area of unique space and manipulate time to the point that “that these two singular units of mass can leave a singular fixed unique point of space at a synchronised time and traval to another unique fixed point of space within the same principal unique area of space via different routes and arrive at unique fixed point of space at unsynchronised time according too atomic clocks synchronised at time of departure”. This must justify the update of Mr Newtons theory of fixed continuous time to Mr Einstein vision of quantified time relative to the unique fixed point of the singular observation. So how will this take mathematics past the point of singularity, well in itself it will not because the fixed position of 0 with + or – as your variation will not allow anything but a singularity in time. ( Mr Einsteins equation E=Mc2, Energy is equal to the mass of light squared, must also lock you into a singularity). The biggest problem facing the transfer of information that will change the fixed position of 0 or singular mathematics to the infinitely variable position of Seige or compound mathematics will be comunication. Because what I beleave Mr Einsteins visualized as quantified time and can only be relative to the unique fixed point of the singular observation. In the practical world I live in any number multiplied by itself must produce an area, and because it has no third dimension. This area cannot even have a surface, because to create a surface you require three dimensions. How does a non-academic practical person, tell a world of academic physics masters. That the most famous equation in the World, E=Mc2 is fine if you are looking to justify the “current situation”. But this must lock you into the present situation where you have only one fixed set of variance. Somewhere between a super nova spewing massive amounts of matter from a magician’s hat, to a matter gobbling black hole putting it back into the magician’s hat, but unable to explain “WHY ! ”. The singularity of Physics currently sees everything as “ONE EVENT”. So how can we take the singularity of this one event be taken forward. I believe the laws of the Universe, Nature, Science, Physics, Cosmology, in Fact everything, “WILL BE ABSOLUTLY CONSTANT”. I also believe, “ANY ENERGY BE IT THE HEAVIEST, DENSIST MASS OR THE FAINTEST GLINT OF LIGHT, IT MUST, (IF MR EINSTIENS THEORY IS TO STAND THE TEST) HAVE AN EQUAL OPPOSITE FORCE COUNTER BALANCING IT. OTHERWISE HOW DOES IT EXIST, BECAUSE ALL ENERGY REQUIRES A SPRINGBOARD OF AN EQUAL OPPOSITE ENERGY TO REACT AGAINST TO CREATE ACTION OR CHANGE? HOWEVER THIS ENERGY WILL APPEAR AS MOVEMENT IF ITS FORCE IS LESS THAN THE COHESIVE FORCE OF THE OPPOSING ENERGY, BUT IT WILL APPEAR AS CHANGE IF ITS FORCE IS GREATER THAN COHESIVE FORCE OF THE OPPOSING ENERGY. HOWEVER IT CAN ONLY BE CHANGED NOT LOST. The biggest problem I have with the current view of mathematics, “IS, HOW CAN A MASS BE REPRESENTED BY A SQUARE” The laws of mathematics, “MUST BE CONSTANT”. Because they are used to justify all we Know, Understand, and identify what we don’t know and obviously can’t understand, yet know must exist. The mass I understand must be a volume, group, Quantity or certainly more than one. This certainly can’t be contained in an area with no Third Dimension. So are the Laws of Physics Constant, or did Mr Einstein Visualise another solution to this Problem. Mr Einstein’s “Theory of Relativity” covered many aspects, Time, Space, energy release, energy retention. I am not, Questioning Mr Einstein’s Theory. His theory of relativity predicted, what is currently called, “The splitting of the Atom”. It is my belief that Mr Einstein only imparted this information because he thought others had all the Knowledge they required too produce this massive energy release. Then, because of his understanding of relativity, he completely understood, how this could be used against what he thought was right. Therefore the best he could hope for was to help “Allies of his choice” develop the technology, and hope this alone would help to protect everything he believed in. Yet relativity told him this could not be the case. Mr Einstein fully understood that if the “allies of his choice” had access to this phenomenal amount of power they would not stop at merely defeating the opposing force at that moment in time. They would use it to enforce there opinion and influence the outcome of other disagreements in later periods of time. Now the question that should be asked is, is it the advance in technology or knowledge that creates advantage or the use of technology or knowledge that appears to create advantage. My thinking is that the use of the technological advantages in knowledge gives the group developing the advances distinct advantages when enforcing there way of life on less advanced groups. But history also tells us the use of this knowledge is very rarely to the advantage of the less advanced group. In fact I will go as far as to say history tells us the dominant always uses there advantages to the disadvantage of the less advantaged. My interest is why this happens and what causes this greed. The classical understanding of time and space developed from Mr Newton’s work and was that events everywhere took place within a shared universal time and an absolute and universal space. Mr Einstein and other had changed this to a new perception that, Mass, distance, energy and the passage of time itself will vary according to the motion of the observer. I have a strong belief that Mr Einstein fully understood, because of his comprehensive understanding of relativity. The method “the allies of his choice” would use this massive advantage in technological power and spent his life not trying to work out the Formula, but trying to hide it because he could predict exactly what would happen.” The pacifist within him would not let him be the one to release Armageddon”. “He knew power without control was a very unequal harmony, however he also knew Power in the wrong control, would lead to an equal harmony that would be very difficult to Re-harmonise”. I think Mr Einstein’s Perception was “everything, that he thought was correct, could be destroyed by the potential forces of relativity, being in the hands of a controlling factor he understood to be fundamentally wrong. He also understood that the singularity of the event fixed the time of the event. Therefore only the Time of the singular event should be fixed in mathematics. Therefore any group of matter that has joint to together to form the unique mass of any event horizon preceding the unique singular event horizon will be altered by the amount of energy gained or lost, by the previous changes that have formed that unique event horizon. This can only take place over the course of time. Therefore the time taken by these group event horizons must be fluid within mathematics. So every individual perspective of time will depend on the unique space and unique mass being observed. So time is unique to the singularity of every individual event horizon. So what can these observations do for mathematics. It is my belief they offer us an opportunity to take a leap into a new type of mathematics. Let’s evaluate the situation 1 Every unit of mass must be unique to the space and time of its creation. 2 Every unit of space can only contain one unit of unique mass at any singularity of time. 3 Every singularity of time can be used to identify both Unique Areas of Space and unique Groups of mass. Why a every unique unit of space must contain a unique unit of mass at every singularity of time. b every unique unit of mass will have been produced in a unique unit of space created by a unique singularity of time. THIS CODE IS NOT SINGULAR, OR FIXED WITHIN A PRESET VARIANCE. THE KEY TO THIS CODE WILL BE MR EINSTEINS FORMULA,“ALL FORCES ARE EQUAL AND OPPOSITE” THIS FORMULA WILL TAKE CHANGES THAT HAVE OCCURRED; THE VARIANCE WILL BE CHANGES THAT ARE OCCURING. THIS WILL PREDICT CHANGES THAT WILL OCCURE. THIS CODE IS COMPOUND OR SEEKING THE SINGULARITY FROM A MULTITUDE OF OBSERVATION POINTS OUTSIDE THE SINGULARITY. This code will have the same ability to expand or contract as any number in the binary chain, multiplied or divided, by any other number in the binary chain. E.G. 1 to Infinity. However this code will not be limited or hampered by having only one start point 0. Its start variance, will be its ability take every change that has already occurred at every unique moment in time and every unique area of space and the changes that have occurred to the unique matter or mass this area of space contains. My first thought, why does a period or era, have to give way to another period or eras, why does their always have to be a start and finish. This compound mathematical code will prove that, “ANY ENERGY BE IT THE HEAVIEST, DENSIST MASS OR THE FAINTEST GLINT OF LIGHT, MUST, (IF RELETIVITY IS TO STAND THE TEST) HAVE AN EQUAL OPPOSITE FORCE COUNTER BALANCING IT. OTHERWISE HOW DOES IT EXIST, BECAUSE ALL ENERGY REQUIRES A SPRINGBOARD OF AN EQUAL OPPOSITE ENERGY TO REACT AGAINST TO CREATE ACTION OR ALTERATION? HOWEVER THE PATH OF THE PRINCIPAL MASS IN ANY SINGULARITY IN TIME, CAN ONLY BE CHANGED BY A FORCE OF ENERGY WITH A MASS OR VALOCITY, THAT IS ABLE TO ALTER THE SINGULARITIES COHESIVE FORCE’S, THAT KEEP THE PRINCIPAL MASS ON ITS SINGULARE PATH AND THIS, CAN ONLY TAKE PLACE OVER THE COURSE OF TIME. THE COMPOUND EFFECT OF THESE CHANGES IN MASS / VALOCITY CAN ONLY BE ALTERATIONS TO THE MASS TO VALOCITY RATIO THAT OTHER GROUPS OF SINGULAR UNITS OF TIME, HOWEVER I HOPE YOU WILL COME TO SEE THIS COMPOUND EFFECT WILL ONLY CAUSE CHANGES TOO ENERGY, NOT LOSS OF ENERGY. So how does compound mathematics understand the cosmic time line, as with all compound mathematical calculations it will always used what is called the “principal unit of mass to velocity ratio”. This will be what in singular mathematics is called on this occasion energy and as in singular mathematics it can not be stable, in whatever form it takes, it will always be affected by other energy sources. These other sources of energy will ether, be attracted too or repulsed from the principal energy source, because if they are neither attracted to, nor repulsed from they must be the same as. The principal mass to velocity ratio will always dominate the area of space within its domain. On the peripheral of the principal mass will always be at least two more units of “mass to velocity ratio”. These will be the “Dominant mass to velocity ratio” this is the mass to velocity ratio that is affecting the principal mass to velocity ratio the most in the unique area of space that this mass to velocity is dominant over in its domain. Its domain will always be smaller than the principal mass to velocity in the unique area of space it dominates. The interactive effect between the principal and dominant is caused by the laws of nature being absolutely constant and is called “harmonisation” this will be covered later. The second mass to velocity ratio affecting the principal mass to velocity at its peripheral will be the “Subordinate mass to velocity ratio” this is a weaker mass to velocity ratio that will be present in a greater or lesser unique area of space than the principal area of space but is not strong enough to dramatically affect the principal area of space. But because the laws of nature are absolutely constant the principal area of space will have to harmonise with the subordinate mass to velocity ratio. It is this “Harmonisation” that causes compound mathematics to work. In singular mathematic you have only 1 fixed point of absolute 0, Zero or nothing, with compound mathematic every principal unit of mass to velocity ratio, is a absolute because it can only occur at a unique position of space, at a unique singularity of time, this makes every position in space at any moment in time unique or absolute. So how will this help understand the cosmic time line, it is every principal mass to velocity ratios unique position in space at a unique moment in time that will solve the current impasse.Cubedmass 22:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)