User talk:CSwarn27
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] License tagging for Image:708889372-1-.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:708889372-1-.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Neonatal nursing
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Neonatal nursing, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nursesource.org/neonatal.html. As a copyright violation, Neonatal nursing appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Neonatal nursing has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Neonatal nursing. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Neonatal nursing, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Erechtheus 20:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Robert Talley
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Robert Talley, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sf49ers.com/team/coaches_detail.php?PRKey=30. As a copyright violation, Robert Talley appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Robert Talley has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Robert Talley. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Robert Talley, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- ReyBrujo 16:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dolphin Coaching Staff
What was the point of adding "Coach" to the end of all the coaching titles? It's kind of redundant. The Section is FOR the coaching staff.
[edit] Edit Summary usage
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Goddard Riverside Community Center
The article Goddard Riverside Community Center has been deleted because it was copied from their website. I see you have been warned about this before. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text like this. Please stop pasting in articles from other websites. FreplySpang 22:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2009 Washington Redskins season
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article 2009 Washington Redskins season, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Congressional correspondent
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Congressional correspondent, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Classic Residence by Hyatt
A tag has been placed on Classic Residence by Hyatt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 21:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Matthew Shea
A tag has been placed on Matthew Shea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornixtalk 20:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
