User talk:Csokyspite
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Contents |
[edit] Magyarization
Csokyspite, please discuss your changes in the talk page of the article. --Olahus (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] hi
Your stats seem to be correct but leave the article for a while please. There is no rush here the correct stats can be updated but first it should be explained that they are really ok. There is some confusion in the issue so try to explain where did you find the stats or try using the full numbers for population like 2.94/20.8 or 1.95/20.8 or similar on the talk page so it will be quite clear that they are right. Hobartimus (talk) 20:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] hi
I really can not understand why should I leave the article who wrote the correct statistics. It's funny that it is written in the article once 48% Hun. 16.1% Rom and beneath at the Education topic 54.5% Hun 16.1 Rom.
Where did I found the statistics?? wikipedia- Trianon treaty article
Actually I wrote it down in the discussion section but nobody answered. Csokyspite (talk) 21:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- You shouldn't leave the article completely only for a few days until you get some better sources or explain to others that 16.1% can't be correct for both cases. This is a confusing issue because there are two data sets one starting with 48.2 the other starting with 54.4 and the other data have to be adjusted as well. Or you can ask Olahus for the number of Rumanians and use simple math to get the percentage from the number of the full population. Meanwhile you can edit other articles but you have to stop editing that article because you will just get reverted this way. Hobartimus (talk) 21:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] oh
I see the problem now. You wrote on the talk page but at the WRONG PLACE. You have to write at the bottom of the page no at the top that's why they cannot read what you say. You also posted to the top of my page as well first I didn't notice it. New messages go to the bottom of the page, just copy what you wrote. Hobartimus (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Check my talk page I moved your comment from the top. You can also use "new section" (it's next to the "edit this page" and "history" at the top).Hobartimus (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I moved the comment for you for now but next time write in the correct section so other ppl can read it. Hobartimus (talk) 21:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Cleja
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. EivindJ (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)