User talk:Cseper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Michael Roizen, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Edits
The fact that you use the pronoun 'we' gives me pause, as does the fact -- which I did not notice earlier -- that you yourself appear to be one of the sources listed in the 'References' section.
May I ask what your direct connection with the subject is, and why you use 'we' when describing your work? --CalendarWatcher (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm even more confused. If 'We' refers to The Plain Dealer staff, you seem to be suggesting some sort of involvement by your newspaper. Surely that can't be right? --CalendarWatcher (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)