User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 34
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Biohacking
Why did you delete the page BioHacking? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.54.85.131 (talk • contribs).
- What page is that? I can't see it... - crz crztalk 13:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh biohacking. It was proposed for deletion. The reason was, "neologism and original research" - crz crztalk 14:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
So, is neologism bad? And biohacking is not an original research. Just take a look at google hits for the term [URL=http://www.google.nl/search?q=biohacking]Biohacking[/URL]. - Paras Chopra
- OK. Well, proposed deletions could be contested even after the fact. Do you want me to undelete it and send it to a full five-day discussion? (I am pretty sure it'll be redeleted afterwards, anyway.) Your call. Tell me, and I will undelete. - crz crztalk 11:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Club of New York
Come see: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Club of New York. —ExplorerCDT 14:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: GRBerry
Sorry about that. I really need to wake up. (I left a comment on the RfA page, see [1]) –The Great Llamasign here 18:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
FJC template placement
Hi. Apropos of something we were discussing a couple of weeks ago, would you kindly review and comment here. Newyorkbrad 19:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Willy on Wheels (book)
this is not a trolling. see amazon[[2]--Wusi0x 21:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Small world!
Hah, I've just caught up with Mikhail, who's... probably the oldest online friend I have that I still talk to fairly regularly. Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 02:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
conjoined twin
crz, I had no idea you were a conjoined twin. The things one never knows about people one meets online...--Kchase T 05:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
W00t DRV
crz: it was not my intent to slight you via my so-called "inappropriate selective notification". I assumed that you, being a) vigilant, b) intelligent, and c) possessing the ability to use Wikipedia with no small skill, you would find the DRV if you so desired. How could I have hidden the DRV from you, even if that was my desire? May I remind you that you are an ADMIN; and as such, have powers that I can't even fathom? Please try not to make a baseless accusation of bad faith about me in the future. Thank you. -- weirdoactor t|c 05:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Have you considered a wikibreak? It might be time, before you make any more baseless accusations, or try to compel others to relax...when it seems you are the one in need of a nap. Step off my shoes, please. You are over-reaching both your authority and it would seem, your own ability to be civil; and I am assuming good faith that you even have such an ability at this point. -- weirdoactor t|c 19:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Do what you need to do on the DRV. Run your own moks. I don't care, so long as you aren't accusing me of stuff that I'm not doing, or telling me to "relax", especially when I'm being pretty chill, considering I'm fighting perhaps the stupidest deletion ever. An unclear consensus, and the admin deleted the HISTORY? WTF? Why didn’t he salt it and pee on the people who voted keep, so long as he was there? Sheesh. Anyway. Just please, PLEASE stop parenting me, okay? It's terribly condescending, and more than a little bit uncivil. Thanks. -- weirdoactor t|c 20:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
-
Signpost updated for December 26th.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 2, Issue 52 | 26 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
My Request for Adminship
Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asteriontalk 13:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Your request
I did notice it, but shortly thereafter you were stressed out over something (I don't remember what and am about to leave for the afternoon) -- not exactly the time to consider someone for more stress! I'll drop you a note about it later... Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 17:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
History of the Jews in Ukraine
Привет. Мне проще обьясниться по-русски, чем по английски, поэтому обращаюсь именно к Вам, а не на страницу обсуждения статьи. Относительно этой статьи мне непонятно почему из-за одного или несколько ненейтральных, по чьему-либо мнению, предложений откатываются все изменения. Я полагаю, что 80-90 % текста не должно вызывать особых возражений, т.к. там не содержится ничего дискуссионного. Возможно, действительно Hillock65 следовало предварительно более тщатльно обсудить вносимые изменения, но они были откачены с совершенно недружественными коментариями. И после этого, были выдвинуты довольно безосновательные обвинения на Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents, которые сопровождались совершенно нелепыми комментариями и угрозами от некоторых участников. --Yakudza 20:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
WP:BITE as policy?
Though there are days I think it ought to be policy, too. It's a guideline. [3].--Kchase T 21:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
NPA warning
No offense, I'll ignore the NPA warning until Alansohn is chastised officially for removing cited information without a decent reason...and then stupidly telling me to put it back. Something that is, to me, akin to vandalism. —ExplorerCDT 23:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- That'll be tough. I call a spade a spade. Still, I expect him to be yelled at for being crazier than a rabid dog (read his psycho-rant on my talk page...he's definitely off his meds) and especially for removing stuff in a plainly wrong fashion. If I'm chastised and he's not, Wikipedia isn't impartial or fair in administering rules despite whatever claims it makes to that effect. —ExplorerCDT 23:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
War on drugs
Thanks, I am still new at this and need pointers like yours to make me more bold in suchlike cases. Agathoclea 01:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Paul N. Yu
Thanks for the tip- I've made a shorter original summary of his career that is not a quote. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by pbyu (talk • contribs).
I prefer PG Tips
I dinn' do nuthin. I was just making some jokes, that's all. I didn't assume faith of any kind - good, bad, etc. My HS calculus teacher always told us, "when you assume you make an ass out of u and me." LOL - crz crztalk 23:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- And no copyrighted images in WP space, you should know that, admin candidate dude. - crz crztalk 00:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up : )
- (If you'll note my single opposer, You may see why I may have overlooked that : ( - jc37 06:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Accountability
I was wondering if you minded if I make use of(blatantly steal) your page for adminstrative accountability. Thanks in advance. Canadian-Bacon 20:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Updating link from talk page archive
After looking over the current CfD, I was looking at the recall section in your talk page archives and I noticed that the link there doesn't work. It should point at this WP:ANI archive page. What is the convention here? Is it OK to update links like that or not? Carcharoth 21:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Bias
Please check Moshe Aryeh Friedman, someone keeps on putting in "rabbi" when its well known he never got smicha. Ok, its a WP:V problem. Also with Yisroel Dovid Weiss, somone keeps on reverting me when I include what i include. If you have time, schkoiauh. frummer 05:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: NPWatcher suggestion
Hi - thanks for the suggstion. I've just done a new release incorporating it. Rather than a new button, I've added the text you proposed to the custom reason dialog (for prods). I've also made aminor fix to the deletion summaries for prods, and hopefully fixed the problem some users have reported with AfDs. Thanks again! Martinp23 13:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:David_Lat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:David_Lat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
MatthewUND RfA
[4] Yo hato el spanisho fakeo. A better translation would be:
Please don't use fake Spanish. Thanks, f(Crazytales) = (user + talk) at 23:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Machsan
You have deleted my entry for Machsan twice. The reasons that you have left do not apply, so therefore I am wondering why it is you deleted it?
- Tell you what - read WP:MUSIC and let me know if you think Machsan meets any of the criteria. If you can assert that, we'll have a discussion. But I am pretty certain it'll be a waste of time. Gut voch. - crz crztalk 04:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Template:ORBCOTW former
Maybe you want to comment on the discussion at Template talk:ORBCOTW former#Template:Click. Thanks --surueña 08:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Guitarmankev1 (talk · contribs)
Thanks for letting me know about this autoblock. It didn't seem very socky to me so I lifted the autoblock. Tastybrothah (talk · contribs) isn't exactly subtle, so if he comes back because of this I'm sure someone will reblock. FreplySpang 09:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for letting FreplySpang know about my situation. I've seen you around at other places too, and you seem like one of the good guys here. I'll remember you in the future. --Kevin (TALK) 15:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- (blush) sorry about the typo (colon, vertical stroke, what's the difference?) - what a way to wake up! :-) FreplySpang 16:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
"Three pilgrim festivals" vs. "Three pilgrimage festivals"
Hi Crz: Question: What should be the name for the Shalosh Regalim: the Three pilgrim festivals or the Three pilgrimage festivals? Please see the discussion at Talk:Three pilgrimage festivals#Name. Thanks you. IZAK 17:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
oo7565
no i did not make that user page it was Vote4llama because who ever that is upset because. I prod one his or her articale for delation waited 5 days then. I desided to put on afd which ( i know i should not have because i should have let the delation prod expire) so i guess he or she is upset at me for even considing the delation prod so missing with my user page is there way of pay back towards me for messing with them i guess. i was not at home last night untill 10 pm because i work. thats beside the point because i know wikipedia time when people makes edits is diffent at 4 or 5pm arizona time people are already have editted the next day but it is still the day before. so if you can help me here any help would be nice i to here from you soonOo7565 17:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
UberBots
Hello,
This is all new to me. As I indicated I am he coach of team 1124, the UberBots who are part of the USFirst organization, which representationin Wikipedia. Our students have asked me, how can other teams (Team 2037, for example) have representation?
If one is to fully describe USFirst, then one would need to have a description of all of the teams that make up teh organization, this is why I believe The UberBots, Team 1124 should be represented.
Thanks
Jim
category
cant figure out how to make a Category. Tried to create a Category of Jewish Supreme Court justices at the Ruth Bader Ginsberg article but it becomes a "edit article". can you show me what to do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LAZY 1L (talk • contribs) 00:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC).
What do you mean by "participants?"
There are categories of Jewish Lawyers, Jewish Jurists, etc., whats the difference?
Aww crap
Whoops, my bad crz. This night was really hectic with all the vandal fighting/ speedy deleting (I did a bunch of those today) that I might have improperly tagged a few. I apologize fully. I'll be more careful in the future. I think I just skimmed through that one (I thought the 300 pounds, 6 ft tall thing was a joke) and, because I had multiple tabs open, I tagged that one later after doing other things (I usually have at least 5 tabs open when I'm on Wikipedia). I realize, however, that that's no excuse. I hope I won't make that mistake again. Again, my apologies. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 06:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh wait
First off, I thank you for checking my work and finding that I have flaws and do make mistakes. Second, I am here asking for an honest appraisal of how I function as a Wikipedian though my editor review, found here. I really wish to improve and I want more editors to be more critical of my work here on Wikipedia. I would be honored to have you review me as an editor.
Thanks for all your time/trouble/extra grief on New Years Eve. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 06:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Adolf Hitler's contacts with Jewish people
Hi Crz: Have you ever had a close look at this strange article: Adolf Hitler's contacts with Jewish people? It's full of red links for the supposed Jews he had contact with (do they deserve articles just because they were Hitler's alleged dentist/shoe-shine-boy/chimney-sweep/whatnots etc?) It's weirdly prurient. The heading stinks. Do all the Jews killed in the Holocaust get to be in it? How about all the theories about Hitler having a Jewish ancestor, does that also count as him having "contact" with Jewish people? I doubt that the originators of this article and those who worked on it have rational objectives. It should be merged with something else involving Adolf Hitler or even deleted for its stupidity. (If not, how about Adolf Hitler's contacts with gypsies, Adolf Hitler's contacts with Italian people, Adolf Hitler's contacts with Russian people, Adolf Hitler's contacts with retarded people, Adolf Hitler's contacts with murderers this can go on forever, and then we can even create Category:Adolf Hitler's contacts with people. IZAK 02:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Kavod HaBriyot#Requesting Comments
See: Talk:Kavod HaBriyot#Requesting Comments. Thanks, IZAK 02:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
My Bad on Aquivaldo Mosquera Speed Delete
Yep, oops, sorry. That little fact certainly should have been in the edit summary. Also, I may be wielding the speedy delete templates a little harder than I should today. And I certainly seem to have consistent poor judgment about either soccer or rugby articles/people and their notability. Thanks for the feedback and heads-up. --Pigmantalk • contribs 02:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Atlas Strategic
im guessing the reason the page was deleted was because of copywrite issues. ive been looking around but cant really find how to site where i got it from and the website that its all taken from was made by me, so i should be able to use info, right?
mike
Happy New Year!
Help for Chelsea Opera Company
Hello, I have a concern about a possible, threatened deletion for Chelsea Opera Organization. It seems the most important objection as been lack of references. However there are several footnotes that are verified nicely this opera company and their work. Their website is first rate. However as I look around the Wikipedia site, I find many small opera companies that do not list any references, and some not even their own website, yet they have not had any threats of deletion. Example is the Muddy River Opera Company that I reasearched and the Lancaster Opera company that has been listed by another Wikipedia contributer in trying to get information as to why this deserving group is even being consideref for deletion. They are young, but well supported by New York higher ups, in their work with young people and the USO care packages and other public service endeavors. This is exactly the type of small company that Should be part of Wikipedea. It seems to be a concern also of unfair treatment by one of the Editors of Wikipedia and I hope you can perhaps step in and bring some reason and clarification to the ongoing discussions. Thank you sincerely,Broadwaydad 05:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Help for Chelsea Opera Company
Hello, I have a concern about a possible, threatened deletion for Chelsea Opera Organization. It seems the most important objection as been lack of references. However there are several footnotes that are verified nicely this opera company and their work. Their website is first rate. However as I look around the Wikipedia site, I find many small opera companies that do not list any references, and some not even their own website, yet they have not had any threats of deletion. Example is the Muddy River Opera Company that I reasearched and the Lancaster Opera company that has been listed by another Wikipedia contributer in trying to get information as to why this deserving group is even being consideref for deletion. They are young, but well supported by the public and New York higher ups, in their work with young people and the USO care packages and other public service endeavors. This is exactly the type of small company that Should be part of Wikipedea. It seems to be a concern also of unfair treatment by one of the Editors of Wikipedia and I hope you can perhaps step in and bring some reason and clarification to the ongoing discussions. Thank you sincerely,Broadwaydad 05:54, 2 January 2007
Addition
I notice that Mr.Darcy, editor claims that having references is a "Rule" as he has written in his notes on Chelsea's discussion page, however I find this is not supported by all I see on Wikipedia, as in the "Stubs" for small groups as Chelsea opera, as I've noted above. I have to believe that Mr. Darcy is in error and hope you can take a look at what is going on. As I see in Wikipedia information that "There are few hard and fast rules on Wikipedia". His actions and attitude seems to be at odds with the encouragment of Wikipedia to bring new people to this site, and supporting each other in fact gathering, to create pages that are accurate and informational, for specific subjects that are not already created. Isn't this the goal of Wikipedia. I am baffled, Please. Broadwaydad 06:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Rabbilau.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rabbilau.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Cotco-Islam AfD
hello Crzrussian, i may need to apologize if my nom was not expressed clearly. the content was already in the original article, removed, and replicated here as User:Canadia argued that the article 'Criticism of Islam' must only contain criticism. i hope that clarifies any misconceptions. ITAQALLAH 15:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
