Talk:Crystalline cohomology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mathematics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating:	B Class	Mid Priority	Field: Geometry
Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Click to show/hide comments. Please add to or update the comments to suggest improvements to the article. Arcfrk 03:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Should the section on algebraic de Rham cohomology rather be moved to de Rham cohomology? Jakob.scholbach 04:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Definitely not! There is already a notice on the top of de Rham cohomology article linking here. However, this page begins to overtake the article on motivic cohomology in its treatment of various Weil cohomology theories. Arcfrk 20:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, I see the link in the de Rham page, but I still think, that the mathematical content if the section on algebraic de Rham coho. given here does (at least at the moment) not overlap with the crystalline part (except perhaps the idea, that both of them are Weil cohom. theories). Instead, the analogy of algebraic de Rham and classical de Rham cohomology is clear from the definition and they also give the same results (over C). So, why not put it there - in a subsection called "Algebraic de Rham cohomology"? Jakob.scholbach 23:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)