User talk:Crunk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crunk... similar request from the Critical Mass wikipedia page. Although you are right that much of the content is identical, I wrote both.... no copyright violated here

[edit] ========================

Crunk, please stop editing User:Marco Passarani's user page. Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 21:12, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] hello

i am doing survey of quaker fathers, if you are interested please let me know! --Marco Passarani 17:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Matt Talbot

Crunk, are you intending to provide sources for the Matt Talbot article? If not, why tag it? Scolaire (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

In what sense is the article "egregious"? It is an encyclopedia article on a notable ascetic. It is of sufficient length, it is laid out in sections, it contains links and categories and, despite your tag, it cites references and sources - it's just lacking inline citations, which is not the same thing. There is nothing in it to justify even the word "bad", never mind "egregious"! Or is it just that the subject matter is not to your taste? Scolaire (talk) 11:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)