Talk:Cruise missile submarine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub	rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale
High	rated as high-importance on the assessment scale

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

[edit] US-focused?

If anyone has any non-US info, please add it, as the current article is "ever so slightly" focused on the US. 85.224.199.178 10:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SSGN scope

Considering that most modern attack submarines can carry cruise missiles, doesn't the SSGN designation somewhat fall out of use? Masterblooregard (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

How many modern attack submarines can carry 154 missiles? Yes, modern SSNs do carry anti-ship and and attack missiles (some of which are cruise, some are not), but usually in the range of 1-20 smaller missiles. Soviet/Russian SSGNs carried much larger missles, while the Ohio class SSGNs carry up to 154 missiles. Therefore, the diesignation still seems useful. - BillCJ (talk) 01:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)