Talk:Crowley's Ridge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Crowley's Ridge Parkway
There is a small article entitled as above that may have some additive value for this article. I don't know the subject well enough to do anything except recommend a merge. Cheers! --Stormbay 02:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Done - wasn't much there to merge. Vsmith 01:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Roads tagging
Since this is not primarily focused on the scenic byway (it being only a tangential topic in this article), I am removing the U.S. Roads tag. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 09:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Since the parkway has been merged here, I put it back. If a new article for the parkway is created, it can be moved. --NE2 16:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have the redirected tagged with USRD. Shouldn't that suffice for keeping the article flagged as a potential subject of a new article? Otherwise it doesn't really make much sense to have a geologic formation tagged with a road tag...even if a scenic parkway was merged into it.—Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 18:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- That doesn't place it in any of the assessment framework, since the bot ignores redirects. --NE2 21:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if no article exists, there's nothing we need to assess, right? We don't really need the bot to enumerate the redirects, because MediaWiki will tell us the total number of pages in the category now. ("The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 1,319 total.") So I think that's really not an issue. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 06:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- That doesn't place it in any of the assessment framework, since the bot ignores redirects. --NE2 21:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have the redirected tagged with USRD. Shouldn't that suffice for keeping the article flagged as a potential subject of a new article? Otherwise it doesn't really make much sense to have a geologic formation tagged with a road tag...even if a scenic parkway was merged into it.—Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 18:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
