Talk:Crosby & Nash
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
[edit] Merger proposal
I propose these two articles be merged as they appear to have the same information. I think a redirect should be made for one of the pages to help avoid future duplicate articles. Glennfcowan 00:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. Crosby & Nash has many more links, so the other article should be merged into this one. Simon12 02:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- NO. These are two totally separate bands. While they share some commonalities, it's like saying that Wings should just be merged into the Beatles template. BoffoHijinx —Preceding comment was added at 11:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- BoffoHijinx, I agree that if the bands were different (like the Beatles/Wings) then the articles should merge. These articles appear to be for the same band (same dates, names, albums, etc.) Are you confusing Crosby and Nash with Crosby, Stills & Nash (and Young)? CSNY has a completely different article than the two in question. If there indeed is a difference, can you please elaborate? It seems the only difference I can see is the word 'and' instead of '&' in the name.--Glennfcowan 15:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
YES This is the same band with two different articles. I think that the Crosby & Nash article should be kept and the other be redirected. KitHutch 16:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC) This merger proposal was a no brainer since the same band had two articles. I went ahead and merged the articles by putting a redirect to this article, which was more complete anyway. If you object, discuss why one band should have two articles here. KitHutch 00:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Whoops...Due to a lack of sleep, I thought someone was proposing a merger between Crosby & Nash and CSNY, not Crosby and Nash and Crosby & Nash. DUH. Yes. These should be merged. Sorry about the confusion.BoffoHijinx 01:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)BoffoHijinx
