User talk:Cristibur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I hope you like it and decide to stay. Here are some handy links for newcomers.

Also you can sign your name on talk pages and vote pages with three tildes like this ~~~, and your name with a time stamp with four like this ~~~~. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. Howabout1 Talk to me! 16:31, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:OTP 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OTP 2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Alr 01:31, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:AIHCB 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AIHCB 1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Alr 01:31, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:AIAV 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AIAV 1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Arnie587 21:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:AS 1.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:AS 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Our forum

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 18:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

La Multi Ani! -- Bonaparte talk 18:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC)




[edit] Image copyrights

I have tagged many of your images as missing source of copyright information. All images on wikipedia have to provide details of who's photo it is and what license it is released under. If you took any of the photos please provide those details and let me know so that the tags can be removed, otherwise if the images are sourced from another website they are generally not going to be usable on wikipedia. --Martyman-(talk) 23:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

OK, firstly the easy list of your images is available here. The images description on wikipedia images should optimally look something like:

Photo taken by User:Cristibur in 2001 and released under the GFDL

That example is if you want to use the GFDL lciense which essentially places restrictions on somone else using the image and claiming they made it and that they own the copyright.I am not sure of the finer legal points of public domain but I belive in the US it is technically wrong to claim you are releasing into the public domain, rather it is better to say copyrighted but all rights waved with a summary like:

Photo taken by User:Cristibur in 2001. All rights waved

The image description page should also contain a copyright template (which are added automatically at upload if you select an option from teh drop down list). The template for the GFDL is added by typing {{GFDL}} or copyrighted no rights reserved is {{No rights reserved}} or placed int he public domain is {{PD-self}} (though I am not sure that one technically right). Let me know if you have any further questions. When you have updated the gas let me know and I can remove the copyright wanring templates. --Martyman-(talk) 01:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Bicaz-lake.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bicaz-lake.JPG. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 08:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:KRPlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KRPlogo.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 07:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Otp_1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Otp_1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 07:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Buna,

A inceput un vot pentru stergerea "Wikipediei Moldovenesti", o creatie a unui American, cu origini suspecte in Basarabia si care nu vorbeste limba wikipediei la care pretinde a fi sysop. Il cheama Node ue si pentru a crea impresia ca lumea doreste aceasta wikipedie, a apelat la toti utilizatorii rusi care au venit sa voteze de partea lui desi nu cunosc bine subiectul si li s-a spus ca voteaza pentru supravietuirea alfabetului chirilic. Asa a ajuns ca votul sa fie 31 pentru stergerea Mo wiki, si 42 impotriva stergerii - deci in alte cuvinte pentru pastrarea wikipediei in limba "moldoveneasca". Vino si voteaza aici[1] , ca sa sergem acesta creatura cu miros bolshevic, care insulta toti romanii de pe ambele maluri ale Prutului. Node ue le-a spus rusilor sa traduca mesajul lui in limba rusa si sa-l transmita mai departe. Trimite si tu mesajul acesta la toti utilizatorii romani-unionisti sau romani-moldoveni unionisti pe care-i cunosti pe en.wiki sau ro.wiki. Dapiks 23:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Romania as featured article

Romania has been nominated to be a featured article ( See Wikipedia:What_is_a_featured_article? for information ). Please cast your vote ( Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Romania ) as to if it should be or not be approved as a featured article. Your vote counts. -Danielsavoiu 08:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TAROM Fleet change info

The Il-62 and BAC One-Eleven information are from Flight International magazine, issue dated 3-9 October 2006, as the reference says. They were compiled from the Flight Acas database and the information is correct to August 2006. The Il-62 ref is on page 68 of the magazine and BAC One-Eleven ref is page 40. Hope this helps. Ardfern 14:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TAROM flight

Nu înţeleg de ce destinaţia trebuie listată sub Bucureşti. Articolul pare eronat dacă destinaţia este listată doar în secţiunea Bucureşti şi nu şi sub Cluj-Napoca, pentru că de exemplu eu când am făcut prima dată modificarea nici nu am urmărit secţiunea Bucureşti, ci am glisat pagina direct la Cluj-Napoca (unde am observat că lipseşte Bucureştiul ca destinaţie). Nu există un motiv real pentru a nu lista Bucureştiul în acea secţiune, decât lipsa punctului de vedere neutru (raţiunea alfabetică pică, de ce nu am creat atunci o secţiune Baia Mare înainte în care să listăm Bucureştiul? Gândeşte-te cum ar arăta atunci articolul...). Nu am găsit pe pagina respectivă (n.r.- Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines) vreo regulă care să susţină ce zici tu, şi şi dacă ar exista vreuna s-ar aplica în articolele precum Iberia destinations care nu listează destinaţiile după aeroport. --Danutz

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Romavia2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Romavia1.JPG. The copy called Image:Romavia1.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tarom70s.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tarom70s.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Better source request for Image:VegAir.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:VegAir.gif. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Otp_4.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Otp_4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mangostar (talk) 21:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Aviation

WikiProject Airports might interest you. Basketball110 17:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)