Template talk:Criminallaw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

⚖
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Template This article has been rated as template-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] The Image in this template

The image that's being used on the criminal law template (Image:Justice12.jpg) doesnt have any source or copyright information. The uploader hasnt responded to requests for some, and so the image is now at a state where it can be speedily deleted, but rather than do that, would somone who is looking after the template perhaps have a look? Cheers... Agnte 17:36, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Please see the discussion on talk:regulatory offences for why this template needs to change the reference from regulatory offences to infraction. I will do this in about a day or so, after people have time to comment. Thesmothete 06:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EngCrimLaw

Template:CrimLaw looks similar to Template:EngCrimLaw. Changes to one may need to be carried through to the other.--Henrygb 09:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New templates

Hi I've done some major revamping to Template:CrimDef, Template:CrimPro and added Template:Criminalcase and Template:Crimes. Most of the criminal law pages have been changed to go to one of these but for the few stragglers I propose redirecting this page. I'll do this in the next few days if this page stays quiet. Cheers Andeggs 12:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prostitution

The accompanying template includes "Pimping" and "Sexual offenses" both as crimes against persons, but neither of those seems to cover (at least to the extent that Prostitution lacks the temlate]] the crimes of prostitution or of solicitation for prostitution, which do exist despite the their non-universal criminality. Bad information design, and probably PoV.
--Jerzyt 11:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)