Talk:Crimson Fields

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 10 September 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

Knight chess piece This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.


[edit] Removed Proposed Deletion Tag

I removed the Proposed Deletion tag. The Battle Isle series has achieved cult status, so this open source variation deserves mention. At this point it is mostly a stub, but it can be improved. - Fils du Soleil 21:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I'd just like to add that per Wikipedia:Notability (software), one of the criteria for notability is that The software is included in a major operating system distribution such as Debian, Fedora Core or FreeBSD, and the maintainer of the distribution is independent from the software developer., which Crimson Fields largely fulfills. Nikola 11:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to point out that Crimson Fields is also distributed by Nokia for their 770 device, and these days is one of the first games ported to new small platforms. Some companies have done the port themselves (it looks like Nokia did) to add value to their product. --70.244.120.143 04:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, if you can show that with an independent, reliable source then that would show it's notability. I'm tagging for notability concerns for now. Marasmusine 12:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Crimfields.png

Image:Crimfields.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)