Criticism of George W. Bush

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States, has drawn significant domestic and international criticism since his election in 2000. His level of popular support has declined from 90 percent (the highest ever recorded by The Gallup Organization)[1] immediately after the September 11, 2001 attacks to 26 percent (in a Newsweek poll taken in June 2007[2]), the lowest level for any sitting President in 35 years, rivaling Richard Nixon's unpopularity at the time of the Watergate scandal and his subsequent resignation. A NBC/WSJ poll[3] also taken in June 2007 indicated only 19% of respondents believing that the country is headed in the right direction, the lowest level recorded in 15 years.

His opponents have criticized his role in the controversial 2000 election,[who?] his way of fighting the War on Terrorism, his support for the USA PATRIOT Act and the 2003 invasion of Iraq, among many other acts and issues along the way, and there is currently a movement to impeach him. Former President Jimmy Carter has called Bush's presidency "the worst in history",[4] although he later said that comment was "careless or misinterpreted," and that he "wasn't comparing this administration with other administrations back through history, but just with President Nixon's."[5] On April 15, 2008, the results of an informal poll of 109 historians (conducted by George Mason University's History News Network) found that 98.2% of the respondents considered Bush's Presidency a failure. 61% of the historians said that Bush was the worst President in United States history. [6]

Contents

[edit] Criticisms of administration

[edit] Foreign policy and national defense

[edit] Al Qaeda

In a White House briefing on August 6, 2001, President Bush was informed of the terrorist threat posed by Al Qaeda in a memorandum entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.". Critics allege that these warnings were ignored.[7] At a press conference held on July, 2007, Bush denied a United States National Counterterrorism Center report that stated that Al-Qaeda has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001." [8]. Bush said that was "simply not the case." [9]

He has also received criticism for publicly using phrases like "bring it on" and "wanted dead or alive", both regarding terrorists.

"Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., called the president's language 'irresponsible and inciteful'". "'I am shaking my head in disbelief,' Lautenberg said. 'When I served in the Army in Europe during World War II, I never heard any military commander — let alone the commander in chief — invite enemies to attack U.S. troops.'"[10] And indeed the Iraqi Resistance group known as the "Islamic Jihad Army" put out a video which stated "George W. Bush, you have asked us to 'bring it on.' And so help me, [we will] like you never expected. Do you have another challenge?" [11][12] Bush apologized for these comments in 2006. [13].

However on September 9, 2007, Bush's homeland security adviser again caused a stir when she, in referencing a new tape by Bin Laden, said "This is about the best he can do. This is a man on a run, from a cave, who's virtually impotent other than these tapes". "In appearance on two Sunday talk shows, she used the 'virtually impotent' reference both times, suggesting the language was chosen with careful purpose". "Such a comment could prove incendiary to like-minded followers of bin Laden who see themselves as a 'vanguard of a global assault on the United States' ... "A provocation like that is not helpful" said Thomas Sanderson of the Center for Strategic and International Studies .[14]

[edit] Iraq

Main article: Opposition to the Iraq War

President Bush has taken a significant amount of criticism for his decision to invade Iraq in March 2003 and his handling of the situation afterwards. As President Bush organized the effort, made the case, and ordered the invasion himself, he has borne the brunt of the criticism for the war.[15] A Newsweek poll taken in June 2007 showed a record 73% of respondents disapproving of Bush's handling of the war in Iraq[16].


Critics of the invasion claimed that it would lead to the deaths of thousands of Coalition soldiers and Iraqi soldiers and civilians, and that it would moreover damage peace and stability throughout the Middle East. When this later turned out to be the case, public support for Bush and his policies dropped sharply.

Another oft-stated reason for opposition is the Westphalian concept that foreign governments should never possess a right to intervene in another sovereign nation's internal affairs. Giorgio Agamben, the Italian philosopher, has also offered a critique of the logic of such pre-emptive war.

Anti-war sentiment has led to a number of large protests in the US, among the most visible being the one led by Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a soldier killed in Iraq, and some reflection in electoral politics. A significant minority of mostly Democratic politicians, such as former Vice President Al Gore and Barack Obama, opposed the invasion of Iraq. John Kerry, the Democratic nominee for President in 2004, voted to authorize the invasion. Howard Dean, a rival for the nomination, ran on an anti-war position, but did not favor quick troop withdrawal. Dennis Kucinich, another candidate for the Democratic nomination, favored replacement of the U.S. occupation force with one sponsored by the UN, as did Ralph Nader's independent presidential candidacy.

[edit] Torture

Main articles: Guantánamo Bay detainment camp and Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse

Another point of discussion has been whether the detainment and treatment of prisoners in the Abu Ghraib prison and the Guantánamo Bay detainment camp constitutes torture or not. Although a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll "found that sizable majorities of Americans disagree with tactics ranging from leaving prisoners naked and chained in uncomfortable positions for hours, to trying to make a prisoner think he was being drowned.[17]

President Bush has stated that "We do not torture."[18] Yet, many people and governments[19][20][21] don't see it that way and have staged several protests.[22][23][24][25] These sentiments are partly a result of the Pentagon's suggestion that the president can legally torture anyone he deems to be a threat to security,[26] and because the Bush administration has repeatedly tried to stop attempts at limiting torture,[27] including legislation by President Bush to exclude himself from the laws created by the McCain Detainee Amendment as well as vetoing legislation that would have made waterboarding and other coercive interrogation methods illegal.[28] Furthermore many people[29][30][31] are concerned by the Bush Administration's use of Extraordinary rendition, where individuals are sent to other countries where torture can easily occur without any form of oversight. Bush defends this practice on the basis that:[32][33]

[...] the United States government has an obligation to protect the American people. It's in our country's interests to find those who would do harm to us and get them out of harm's way. And we will do so within the law, and we will do so in honoring our commitment not to torture people. And we expect the countries where we send somebody to, not to torture, as well. But you bet, when we find somebody who might do harm to the American people, we will detain them and ask others from their country of origin to detain them. It makes sense. The American people expect us to do that.

A pentagon memo lists many interrogation techniques which were requested and approved during the presidency of George W. Bush on the basis that "The current guidelines for interrogation procedures at GTMO limit the ability of interrogators to counter advanced resistance".[34]. The Bush administration's connection to torture has been one of the main considerations in the movement to impeach George W. Bush.

Torture has in several cases become military policy[34][35] and several high ranking US officials are being charged with war crimes in Germany[36].

[edit] Other human rights

The Bush administration has been criticized for failing to support the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The Bush administration "has taken the position that disability is neither a human rights issue nor a predicate for international law."[37]

[edit] Domestic policy

Domestic criticism of Bush has waxed and waned throughout his administration. Before 9/11, Bush was reviled by the bulk of the American left, mostly for his role in the controversial 2000 election, and for perceived shortcomings in his No Child Left Behind program for education.[38] The next major domestic item which Bush faced significant opposition to was his program of tax cuts, codified in the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. Both acts ultimately passed, but calls for their repeal lasted until the end of the 2004 campaign. Democratic candidate Howard Dean in particular called for a repeal of the part of the tax cuts which affected the wealthiest Americans in order to fund public health care programs and reduce the federal deficit.[39]

After Bush was re-elected, he made Social Security reform a top priority. He proposed options to permit Americans to divert a portion of their Social Security tax (FICA) into secured investments, creating a "nest egg" that he claimed would enjoy steady growth. This led Democrats to label the program a "privatization" of Social Security. Bush embarked on a 60-day tour to shore up public support for the plan, attacking the political reaction against reforms. Ultimately, however, no consensus on a plan could be reached within the congressional Republican party, and Bush was left without any political will to pass his reforms. The issue was dropped, and the status quo maintained.[40]

Bush has been increasingly forced to defend his actions on many fronts and has been unable to generate widespread support in the nation as a whole.[41] An example of the general displeasure and extent to which many Americans have lost respect and confidence in the President lies in his recent election as the "Biggest Tool of 2006" in an online poll created by Comedy Central.[42]

The Republican Party's defeat in the 2006 US midterm elections is taken as another sign of plummeting public support for President Bush. After the Democratic Party's victory, MSNBC reported that "The war in Iraq, scandals in Congress and declining support for Bush and Republicans on Capitol Hill defined the battle for House and Senate control".[43]

[edit] Civil liberties and expanding government

After 9/11, Bush continually signed legislation interpreted as limiting the civil liberties of United States citizens. The two most prominent pieces of legislation are the PATRIOT Act and the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which remove certain privacy rights and the right of habeas corpus. Criticism has come from both sides on this issue. Conservatives have criticized him for increased government spending, including non-defense spending, after running as a candidate who pledged to reduce spending and make government smaller. Liberals have criticized him for eliminating basic civil liberties and for not fulfilling his Constitutional duties to uphold habeas corpus.

[edit] Economy and fiscal policies

The Bush administration has also come under attack from the American right-wing, particularly with regard to its economic policies. The American Conservative laments "Bush doesn’t know how to stop. Like a credit-card thief, the President of the United States is going on a shopping binge and making other people pay. If history gives Bush a nickname, it will be Deadbeat Dubya".

Calling Bush "The Mother of All Big Spenders", the libertarian think-tank Cato Institute writes that "Sadly, the Bush administration has consistently sacrificed sound policy to the god of political expediency".[44] Yet when Democrats want to increase spending on domestic issues such as health care for the poor Bush suddenly becomes a "fiscal conservative" accusing them of "working to bring back the failed tax-and-spend policies of the past" and vowing to fight them. But says Cato's Chris Edwards, "When he gives speeches now, you hear him bashing the Democrats on overspending. It sounds ridiculous, because we know he's a big spender."[45] "After running up $3 trillion in new debt - including more than half a trillion dollars for his flawed Iraq policy - it is astounding that the president is once again lecturing Congress about fiscal responsibility and fiscal priorities," stated Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev).[46]

Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve for 18 years, serving under six Presidents and who describes himself as "a lifelong Libertarian Republican", writes in his book The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World that Bush and the congressional Republicans "swapped principle for power". "Little value was placed on rigorous economic policy debate or the weighing of long-term consequences". Interestingly he writes that former President Bill Clinton had "a consistent, disciplined focus on long-term economic growth [which] became a hallmark of his presidency" and says that Clinton was "by far" one of the two "smartest presidents I've worked with".

Greenspan also says "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil"[47] and "getting Saddam out of there was very important, but had nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, it had to do with oil."[48][49] With regards to the costs of the war in Iraq, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will come to between one and one and a half trillion dollars by 2010.

"Those costs -- both to sustain the current mission in Iraq and to pay longer-term 'hidden' expenses like troop healthcare and replacement equipment -- are far more than US officials advertised when Congress gave President Bush the authority to launch the invasion in March 2003. At the time, the White House and then-defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld predicted a quick, decisive victory and counted on Iraqi oil revenues to pay for the war. And when Lawrence Lindsey, one of Bush's top budget advisers, estimated in 2003 that the entire undertaking could cost as much as $200 billion, he was fired ... McGovern said he is worried about the long-term financial impact of the war, adding that his primary concern is that the United States is borrowing money to pay for it. Some leading economists have predicted that, depending on how long troops remain in Iraq, the endeavor could reach several trillion dollars as a result of more 'hidden' costs -- including recruiting expenses to replenish the ranks and the lifelong benefits the government pays to veterans. 'It is being paid for on the national credit card,' McGovern said. 'It is being put on the backs of our kids and grandkids. That is indefensible.'"[50]

In fact, according to the former World Bank vice-president, Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist and now a professor at the Columbia Business School, when other factors, like medical and welfare costs of US military servicemen are added in, the cost just to date is closer to $3.3 trillion.[51] However, continues Stiglitz, "Three trillion is a very conservative number, the true costs are likely to be much larger than that". "The money being spent on the war each week would be enough to wipe out illiteracy around the world ... Just a few days' funding would be enough to provide health insurance for US children who were not covered," he said.

There are even fears that the United States and world economy could slide into another Great Depression.[52][53][54]

[edit] Response to Hurricane Katrina

Main article: Criticism of government response to Hurricane Katrina

The President came under more criticism when the powerful Hurricane Katrina slammed into the Gulf Coast region during the early hours of August 30, 2005. In the wake of the hurricane, two levees protecting New Orleans from Lake Pontchartrain collapsed, leading to widespread flooding. In the aftermath of this disaster, thousands of city residents, unable or unwilling to evacuate prior to the hurricane, became stranded with little or no relief for several days, resulting in lawless and unsanitary conditions in some areas. Blame for inadequate disaster response was partially attributed to state and local authorities, but public outcry in the disaster's early hours was largely directed at the Bush administration, mainly FEMA[55] and the Department of Homeland Security[56] alleging weak crisis management and coordination. In fact a Canadian search-and-rescue team actually made it to a New Orleans suburb 5 days before U.S. aid arrived.[57] Additionally, Bush rejected aid from other countries such as Cuba, which offered to send "more than 1500 medical doctors with 37 tons of medical supplies".[58]

Rapper Kanye West said in A Concert for Hurricane Relief that "George Bush doesn't care about black people," alleging that Bush did not do anything to help merely because most of the victims were black.[59] Others have identified political conservatism as the overriding cause of problems in the way the disaster was handled.[60] These critics argue that the alleged unreadiness of the United States National Guard, negligence of federal authorities, and haplessness of officials such as Michael Brown did not represent incompetence on the part of the federal authorities, but were instead natural and deliberate consequences of the conservative philosophy embraced by the Bush administration, especially "sink or swim" policies to force reductions in government expenditure and privatize key government responsibilities such as disaster preparedness[61] [62], both of which resulted in the systematic dismantling of FEMA by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security[63].

Criticism led to the resignation of FEMA director Michael Brown, and eventually, Bush himself accepted personal responsibility for what he deemed "serious problems in the federal government's response" in a September 15, 2005 press conference. Currently, the administration is investigating itself, yet several politicians have called for either congressional or independent investigations, claiming that the Executive Branch cannot satisfactorily investigate itself.[64][65][66]

[edit] Environment

Bush has been criticized by national and international environmental groups for his administration's attacks on and rollbacks of hard won environmental protections going back more than three decades and for its general anti-environmental thrust. These are in areas ranging from the attacks on the endangered species act and the clean air and water acts to climate change and many more. For a comprehensive (to date of the report) list see the National Resources defense Council's report The Bush Record, NRDC's comprehensive account of the Bush administration's environmental policies from 2001 through 2005. More up-to-date information can be found on the U.S. Senate website. According to MSNBC:

After four years in office, the George W. Bush administration has compiled an environmental record that is taking our nation in a new and dangerous direction. Last year alone, Bush administration agencies made more than 150 actions that weakened our environmental laws. Over the course of the first term, this administration led the most thorough and destructive campaign against America's environmental safeguards in the past 40 years.[67]

In Texas Chainsaw Management (2007) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. argues that "The verdict on George W. Bush as the nation's environmental steward has already been written in stone. No president has mounted a more sustained and deliberate assault on the nation's environment. No president has acted with more solicitude toward polluting industries. Assaulting the environment across a broad front, the Bush administration has promoted and implemented more than 400 measures that eviscerate 30 years of environmental policy." Kennedy has also written a book Crimes Against Nature: How George W. Bush and His Corporate Pals Are Plundering the Country and Hijacking Our Democracy. See also the website BushGreenWatch.

[edit] Dismissal of U.S. attorneys

The dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy is an ongoing political dispute initiated by the unprecedented dismissal of seven United States Attorneys by the Bush administration's Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2006, and their replacement by interim appointees under provisions of the 2005 Patriot Act reauthorization.[68][69][70][71]

Congressional investigations have focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations are that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[72][73] Clear explanations for the dismissals remain elusive, however, with several administration officials providing contradictory testimony or testimony contradicted by documents subpoened by Congress.[74][75][76] On July 25, 2007 the United States House Committee on the Judiciary voted along party lines 22-17 to issue citations of Contempt of Congress to White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers for their failure to respond to Congressional subpoenas.[77]

Critics argue that the scandal has undermined both the integrity of the Department of Justice and the non-partisan tradition of U.S. Attorneys.[78][79][80][81] Others have gone so far as to liken the event to Watergate, referring to it as Gonzales-gate.[82] Many members of Congress from both parties called for the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.[83] As of June 25, 2007, six senior staff of the Department of Justice had resigned, including the Deputy Attorney General, the Acting Associate Attorney General, the Chief of Staff for the Attorney General, the Chief of Staff for the Deputy Attorney General, the Director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, and the DOJ's White House Liaison.[84][85] By September 17, 2007 Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, and several additional senior Department of Justice officers had departed from office. His successor, Michael Mukasey after a controversy over his Senate testimony regarding the legality of torture and waterboarding, was confirmed to office by a vote of the Senate on November 8, 2007, and was sworn in on November 9, 2007.

[edit] Hostility toward the poor

Detractors have presented examples of a hostility to the poor, and a favoring of the rich, on the part of the Bush Administration, and Republicans in general. "This is an impressive crowd -- the haves and the have-mores. Some call you the elite. I call you my base," stated Bush,[86] before a white-tie fundraiser; footage of this statement was shown in Michael Moore's documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 to emphasize this specific issue. His supposed distaste for the working class shows in tax cuts for the very rich,[87] which leading economists have suggested may hurt the poor.[88]

Moral and ethical questions have been raised over the billions of dollars Bush has requested for the open-ended Iraq war,[89] while ensuring less money is made available to help children and the poor in the United States.[90] One example is a perceived stinginess toward poor children with regards to health care in a time when it is increasingly unaffordable.[90][91] Another example is Bush's effort to cut food stamps for the poor. In 2005, Bush called for "billions of dollars in cuts that will touch people on food stamps and farmers on price supports, children under Medicaid and adults in public housing."[92] While passed by the Republican Congress, initially the "White House proposed the restriction".[93]

[edit] Criticisms of personality

[edit] Leadership

Bush continues reading with children for several minutes after being informed about the September 11, 2001 attacks, which has become a point of criticism by his opponents.
Bush continues reading with children for several minutes after being informed about the September 11, 2001 attacks, which has become a point of criticism by his opponents.

Bush's critics have questioned his leadership skills regarding some events. One occasion was on the moment of the September 11th World Trade Center attacks: after being told by Chief of Staff Andrew Card that the U.S. was "under attack", Bush continued with the reading lesson with elementary school children for seven minutes. [94][95] Democratic 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry cited Bush's lack of swift action, calling into question the incumbent's leadership capabilities, and concluding: "Americans want to know that the person they choose as president has all the skills and ability, all of the mental toughness, all of the gut instinct necessary to be a strong commander in chief."[96] The 9/11 Commission later released a summary of Bush closed-door testimony, which stated the President's "instinct was to project calm, not to have the country see an excited reaction at a moment of crisis". It went on to say "The President felt he should project strength and calm until he could better understand what was happening."[95] This situation was featured prominently in Michael Moore's 2004 documentary Fahrenheit 9/11.

President Bush twice, in late 2001 and early 2002, stated that before entering the classroom he had seen on a television set the first plane hit the World Trade Center, and that he had assumed it was an accident.[97][98] This was impossible, as no televised footage of the first plane crashing into the tower was broadcast until the afternoon of that day. The White House explained his remarks as "a mistaken recollection".[99]

Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina was also criticized widely by the media, particularly by commentators Frank Rich, David Remnick, Josh Marshall, Arianna Huffington, Greg Mitchell, Andrew Sullivan, and Howard Kurtz.[100] Remnick charges that "to a frightening degree, Bush's faults of leadership and character were brought into high relief by the [Hurricane Katrina] crisis."[101]

[edit] Intellectual and psychological ability

George W. Bush's intellectual capacities have been questioned by press, media personalities and politicians on numerous occasions.[102][103] This tendency led to farcical hoaxes such as the U.S. Presidents IQ hoax.[104] A real historiometric study, published in 2006 the scientific journal Political Psychology, estimated the IQs of all US presidents since 1900 by analyzing each president's speeches and publications. The study ranked Bush second to last, with an estimated IQ between 111.1 and 138.5, and a mean of 125 (an IQ considered above average).[105] In an interview, it was noted by the study's director that "Bush may be 'much smarter' than the findings imply" but that he "scores particularly unimpressively for 'openness to experience, a cognitive proclivity that encompasses unusual receptiveness to fantasy, aesthetics, actions, ideas and values.'"[106][107][108]

[edit] Personal behavior

Bush has admitted undergoing a 'battle' with alcohol and alcoholism, which, he has stated, ended in 1986. [109]

Bush's presidency has seen the re-emergence of the use of a term previously applied to his father, "Bushism", to describe Bush's colorful mispronunciations and misuse of words when speaking. Bushisms have been widely popularized and archived across the Internet due to their often humorous nature.[110] Even as early as the 2000 presidential debates, this was the subject of a Saturday Night Live sketch (see "Strategery").[111] Perhaps his most famous mispronunciation is that of "nucular" instead of "nuclear" when referring to nuclear weapons. In addition, he is often disparagingly called "Dubya", a stereotypical Texan pronunciation of the letter "W," which is Bush's middle initial. However, Bush's supporters have been known to refer to him as Dubya as well.

Bush critic Georgie Anne Geyer found his behavior shocking[112] and Sean-Paul Kelley, founder of the left-wing blog The Agonist, found his behavior appalling[113]. Mishaps include an unexpected shoulder rub he gave German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the G-8 summit,[114][115] an incident where Bush wiped his glasses on an unsuspecting woman's dress on The David Letterman Show,[116] an incident when he ruined a rented house in Montgomery, Alabama and never paid the damage fine,[117][118] and a time when he flashed the finger in front of a camera during his time as governor.[119]

Another more recent example is during a commemorative ceremony in which Bush presented the mothers of fallen soldiers with a Presidential coin, in which he jokingly commented to one of them "now don't go sell it on eBay".[120]

[edit] Surveys of historians

Main article: Historical rankings of United States Presidents

Since 2006, surveys of professional historians have given the Bush presidency low marks. A 2006 Siena College poll of 744 professors reported the following results:[121]

  • "George W. Bush has just finished five years as President. If today were the last day of his presidency, how would you rank him? The responses were: Great: 2%; Near Great: 5%; Average: 11%; Below Average: 24%; Failure: 58%."
  • "In your judgment, do you think he has a realistic chance of improving his rating? Two-thirds (67%) responded no; less than a quarter (23%) responded yes; and 10% chose no opinion or not applicable."

Thomas Kelly, professor emeritus of American studies at Siena College, said: "President Bush would seem to have small hope for high marks from the current generation of practicing historians and political scientists. In this case, current public opinion polls actually seem to cut the President more slack than the experts do." Dr. Douglas Lonnstrom, Siena College professor of statistics and director of the Siena Research Institute, stated: "In our 2002 presidential rating, with a group of experts comparable to this current poll, President Bush ranked 23rd of 42 presidents. That was shortly after 9/11. Clearly, the professors do not think things have gone well for him in the past few years. These are the experts that teach college students today and will write the history of this era tomorrow."[121]

In 2008, the History News Network conducted an unscientific poll among 109 professional historians. That poll found that, among those professional historians, 98% believe that the George W. Bush presidency is a failure, and that 61% believe it to be the worst in history.[122] This quote from one of the respondents is an example of historians' reasons for the low ranking:

No individual president can compare to the second Bush. Glib, contemptuous, ignorant, incurious, a dupe of anyone who humors his deluded belief in his heroic self, he has bankrupted the country with his disastrous war and his tax breaks for the rich, trampled on the Bill of Rights, appointed foxes in every henhouse, compounded the terrorist threat, turned a blind eye to torture and corruption and a looming ecological disaster, and squandered the rest of the world’s goodwill. In short, no other president’s faults have had so deleterious an effect on not only the country but the world at large.[122]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ "USAT/Gallup Poll: Bush approval at new low; Republican support eroding", USA Today, 10 July 2007. Retrieved on 2007-11-28. 
  2. ^ How Low Can Bush Go?. Newsweek (June 21, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-06-22.
  3. ^ Republicans abandoning Bush. MSNBC (June 13, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-06-14.
  4. ^ Carter: Bush's presidency has been 'worst in history'. KomoTV (May 19, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-06-12.
  5. ^ "Carter: Anti-Bush remarks 'careless or misinterpreted'", Associated Press, May 21, 2007. Retrieved May 21, 2007
  6. ^ HNN Poll: 61% of Historians Rate the Bush Presidency Worst
  7. ^ Jason Leopold (January 31, 2006). Bush ignored 9/11 Warnings. truthout. Retrieved on 2007-05-03.
  8. ^ US concern at al-Qaeda strength. BBC News (July 12, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-07-13.
  9. ^ Bush denies al-Qaeda has renewed. BBC News (July 12, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-07-13.
  10. ^ USA Today, 2003-07-02
  11. ^ ABC News
  12. ^ video
  13. ^ Leslie Savan (June 2, 2006). Regrets? Confessions? Bring 'em on!. The Boston Globe. Retrieved on 2007-06-11.
  14. ^ article
  15. ^ John Hickman (September 6, 2006). Bush, Not Iraq War Critics, "Could Not Be More Wrong". Baltimore Chronicle. Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  16. ^ How Low Can Bush Go?. Newsweek (June 21, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-06-22.
  17. ^ Locy, Toni. "Poll: Most object to extreme interrogation tactics", USA TODAY, USA TODAY, 2005-01-13. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) "sizable majorities of Americans disagree with tactics" 
  18. ^ Bush: ‘We do not torture’ terror suspects. Associated Press (Nov 7, 2005). Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  19. ^ Carlson, Darren. "Public Believes U.S. Government Has Tortured Prisoners" (fee required), The Gallup Poll, The Gallup Organization, 2005-11-29. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) "[...]denying his agency tortures prisoners. But most Americans think otherwise." 
  20. ^ Carlson, Darren; CNN, USA Today. "Americans Frown on Interrogation Techniques" (fee required), The Gallup Poll, The Gallup Organization, 2005-03-08. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) "a majority of Americans think it's wrong for the government to use any of these methods" 
  21. ^ Cody, Edward. "China, Others Criticize U.S. Report on Rights", Washington Post Foreign Service, The Washington Post Company, 2005-03-04. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) "No country should exclude itself from the international human rights development process" 
  22. ^ "Guantanamo protest at US embassy", UK BBC NEWS, British Broadcasting Corporation, 2007-01-11. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) "More than 300 protesters gathered outside the US embassy for the hour-long demonstration." 
  23. ^ Sun, Lena. "As Torture Survivors Watch, Activists Stage Arrests Near White House", Washington Post News, The Washington Post Company, 2005-06-27. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) "The men and women who survived imprisonment, beatings and rapes knew ahead of time that yesterday's arrest of a group of their supporters in front of the White House was a symbolic protest to spotlight the continuing use of torture by governments around the world, including the United States." 
  24. ^ Israel, Esteban. "Guantanamo prison draws protests worldwide" (Reprint), Washington Post News, Reuters, 2007-01-11. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) 
  25. ^ Leonnig, Carol. "80 Arrested Protesting Guantanamo Detentions", Washington Post Nation News, The Washington Post Company, 2007-01-12. Retrieved on 2007-01-20. (Eng) 
  26. ^ US 'not bound by torture laws'. BBC News (June 7, 2004). Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  27. ^ Congress presses for torture ban. BBC News (December 15, 2005). Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  28. ^ http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080308/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_torture
  29. ^ Chandra Lekha Sriram (December 13, 2005). Exporting Torture: US Rendition and European Outrage. JURIST. Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  30. ^ US Consul's gaffe provokes outrage in Scotland. SACC (January 16, 2006). Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  31. ^ Mary Crane (December 6, 2005). U.S. Treatment of Terror Suspects and U.S.-EU Relations. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  32. ^ George W. Bush (April 28, 2005). Press Conference of the President. The White House. Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  33. ^ Dan Isaacs (June 14, 2005). US suspects 'face torture overseas'. BBC News. Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
  34. ^ a b William J. Haynes II, General Counsel (2002-11-27). "Counter-Resistance Techniques" (PDF Reprint ACTION MEMO FOR SECRETARY OF DEFENSE). . DEFENCE PENTAGON Retrieved on 2007-01-21.
  35. ^ R. Jeffrey Smith and Josh White. "General Granted Latitude At Prison", Abu Ghraib Prison, The Washington Post Company, 2004-06-12. Retrieved on 2007-07-30. (Eng) "sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuse" 
  36. ^ ADAM ZAGORIN. "Exclusive: Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld Over Prison Abuse", U.S., Time Inc., 2006-11-10. Retrieved on 2007-07-30. (Eng) "The utter and complete failure of U.S. authorities to take any action to investigate high-level involvement in the torture program could not be clearer,[...]" 
  37. ^ Thornburgh, Dick and Reich, Alan (November 3, 2004). Human Rights for the Disabled. Washington Post. Retrieved on 2007-06-13.
  38. ^ Bush stumps for 'No Child Left Behind'. CNN (January 6, 2004). Retrieved on 2007-11-01.
  39. ^ Bruce Bartlett (January 06, 2004). Tax Reform. TrendMacrolytics. Retrieved on 2007-11-01.
  40. ^ Allan Sloan (February 8, 2006). Bush's Social Security Sleight of Hand. Washington Post. Retrieved on 2007-11-01.
  41. ^ Bush Approval Ratings. Polling Report.com. Retrieved on 2007-11-01.
  42. ^ Bush 'Wins' Poll. Comedy Central. Retrieved on 2007-11-01.
  43. ^ Democrats win control of Senate. MSNBC (Nov 9, 2006). Retrieved on 2007-11-01.
  44. ^ CATO Institute article
  45. ^ IHT.com article
  46. ^ The Bulletin
  47. ^ Yahoo News article
  48. ^ Wall Street Journal Blogs
  49. ^ TheAge.com
  50. ^ Boston.com article
  51. ^ TheAustralian.news.com article
  52. ^ Reuters article
  53. ^ Intelligencer.ca article
  54. ^ GulfNews.com article
  55. ^ Ahlers, Mike M.. "Report: Criticism of FEMA's Katrina response deserved", CNN, April 14, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-01. 
  56. ^ "Chertoff: Katrina scenario did not exist", CNN, September 5, 2005. Retrieved on 2007-11-01. 
  57. ^ CommonDreams.org article
  58. ^ CommonDreams article
  59. ^ de Moraes, Lisa. "Kanye West's Torrent of Criticism, Live on NBC", Washington Post, 2005-09-03. Retrieved on 2006-11-01. 
  60. ^ Lakoff, George; Halpin, John (October 7, 2005). Framing Katrina. The American Prospect. Retrieved on 2007-07-01.
  61. ^ Scahill, Jeremy (June 5, 2006). In the Black(Water). The Nation. Retrieved on 2007-07-05.
  62. ^ Halliburton gets another $33 Million for Hurricane Katrina clean-up. Halliburton Watch (October 12, 2005). Retrieved on 2007-07-05.
  63. ^ Holdeman, Eric (August 30, 2005). Destroying FEMA. Washington Post. Retrieved on 2007-07-05.
  64. ^ Hsu, Spencer S.. "Leaders Lacking Disaster Experience", Washington Post, 2005-09-09. Retrieved on 2006-11-01. 
  65. ^ Pearson, Diana. "CRONYISM in the Bush Administration", Time, 2005-09-25. Retrieved on 2006-11-01. 
  66. ^ "How Many More Mike Browns Are Out There?", Time, 2005-09-25. Retrieved on 2006-11-01. 
  67. ^ NRDC.org
  68. ^ Scelfo, Julie. "'Quite Unprecedented': Former U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White explains why the firing of eight federal prosecutors could threaten the historic independence of federal law-enforcement officials.", Newsweek, March 15, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-05-28. 
  69. ^ Eggen, Dan; Paul Kane. "Gonzales: 'Mistakes Were Made': But Attorney General Defends Firings of Eight U.S. Attorneys", Washington Post, March 14, 2007, pp. A01. Retrieved on 2007-05-28. 
  70. ^ "Fired U.S. Attorneys", Washington Post, March 6, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-05-28. 
  71. ^ Montopoli, Brian. "So Is This U.S. Attorney Purge Unprecedented Or Not?", Public Eye, CBS News, March 14, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-05-29. 
  72. ^ Bowermaster, David. "Charges may result from firings, say two former U.S. attorneys", The Seattle Times, May 9, 2007. 
  73. ^ Eggen, Dan; Amy Goldstein. "Voter-Fraud Complaints by GOP Drove Dismissals", The Washington Post, May 14, 2007. 
  74. ^ Eggen, Dan. "6 of 7 Dismissed U.S. Attorneys Had Positive Job Evaluations", Washington Post, February 18, 2007, pp. A11. Retrieved on 2007-05-28. 
  75. ^ Eggen, Dan; Paul Kane. "Ex-aide contradicts Gonzales on firings", Washington Post, March 30, 2007, pp. A01. Retrieved on 2007-05-27. 
  76. ^ "Deputy AG 'not fully candid,' ex-Justice aide testifies", CNN.com, CNN, May 23, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-05-28. 
  77. ^ Ari Shapiro. "Bush Aides in Contempt; Will They Be Prosecuted?", All Things Considered, National Public Radio, July 25, 2007. 
  78. ^ Ari Shapiro. "Ex-U.S. Official: Fired Prosecutors Were 'Smeared'", National Public Radio, May 3, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-05-21. 
  79. ^ Rebecca Carr. "Former Justice Official: Fired U.S. Attorneys Among the Best", Cox Newspapers, May 8, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-05-21. 
  80. ^ Taylor, Marisa; Margaret Talev. "U. S. Attorneys: 2 additional prosecutors were considered for ouster", McClatchy Washington Bureau, McClatchy Newspapers, May 16, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-06-20. 
  81. ^ Patrick Leahy (March 19, 2007). Statement of Sen. Patrick Leahy: On S. 214, Preserving United States Attorney Independence Act Of 2007. Senator Patrick Leahy. Retrieved on 2007-05-29.
  82. ^ Garfield, Bob. "Gonzales-gate", On the Media, National Public Radio {NPR, June 15, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-06-15. 
  83. ^ See references on Alberto Gonzales#Calls for resignation.2C firing.2C and no-confidence resolution
  84. ^ Jordan, Lara Jakes. "Official Close to Attorney Firings Quits", Los Angeles Times, June 15, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-06-15. 
  85. ^ Eggen, Dan. "Third-in-Command at Justice Dept. Resigns: Mercer to Leave Washington Job but Keep U.S. Attorney's Position in Montana", Washington Post, Saturday, June 23, 2007, pp. A04. Retrieved on 2007-06-25. 
  86. ^ Marie Coco (February 6, 2007). "Hollow Talk on 'Income Inequality'?". Washington Post. 
  87. ^ Edmund L. Andrews (2007-01-08). "Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very Rich, Study Says". New York Times. 
  88. ^ Laura D'Andrea Tyson (August 11, 2003). "The Bush Tax Cuts Are Sapping America's Strength". Business Week. 
  89. ^ Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray (March 9, 2007). "Bush Threatens to Veto Democrats' Iraq Plan". Washington Post: A01. 
  90. ^ a b Online NewsHour (December 21, 2007). Senate Majority Leader Reid Weighs Partisan Divides, Security in Iraq. PBS. Retrieved on 2008-02-13. Senator Harry Reid (D - NV): "The Leave No Child Behind Act is leaving children behind. We need money to take care of that; there isn't enough money because of the war in Iraq." and "How much longer are we going to be asked to spend $12 billion a month on this war, when we don't have money for health care? We tried to get 10,000 poor children health insurance. The president said there's not enough money to do that."
  91. ^ Catherine Larkin and Edwin Chen (August 21, 2007). Bush Adds Restrictions to U.S. Children's Health Plan (Update3). bloomberg.com. Retrieved on 2008-02-13. "The Bush administration, fighting efforts by states and Congress to expand a popular health insurance program for children in low-income families, is making it more difficult for families to sign up ... 'The ultimate effect of this new policy is that tens of thousands of children who have health insurance will effectively lose that insurance,' said Rachel Klein, deputy director of health policy for Families USA, a Washington-based consumer group".
  92. ^ Joel Havemann and Mary Curtius (February 6, 2005). "Bush to Propose Billions in Cuts". Los Angeles Times. 
  93. ^ AP (October 29, 2005). "US poor set to lose food stamps". Sydney Morning Herald. 
  94. ^ Adair, Bill; Hegarty, Stephen. "The drama in Sarasota", St. Petersburg Times, 2002-09-08. Retrieved on 2007-06-15. 
  95. ^ a b Achenbach, Joel. "On 9/11, a Telling Seven-Minute Silence", The Washington Post, 2004-06-19. Retrieved on 2007-08-11. 
  96. ^ Healy, Patrick. "Kerry questions Bush's wartime leadership", Boston Globe. 
  97. ^ President Meets with Displaced Workers in Town Hall Meeting 2001-12-04
  98. ^ President Holds Town Hall Forum on Economy in California 2002-01-05
  99. ^ Paltrow, S. (2004) "Day of Crisis: Detailed Picture of U.S. Actions on Sept. 11 Remains Elusive." Wall Street Journal March 22
  100. ^ Kurtz, Howard. "The Politics of Katrina", Washington Post. 
  101. ^ Remnick, David. "Under water", The New Yorker. 
  102. ^ Baker, Peter. "Pundits Renounce The President", Washington Post, 2006-08-20. Retrieved on 2006-09-11. 
  103. ^ Walters, Simon. "Blair 'feels betrayed by Bush on Lebanon'", Daily Mail, 2006-08-19. Retrieved on 2006-09-11. 
  104. ^ President Bush Has Lowest IQ of all Presidents of past 50 Years. snopes.com (2004-07-15). Retrieved on 2006-09-11.
  105. ^ Simonton, Dean Keith (2006-08-01). "Presidential IQ, Openness, Intellectual Brilliance, and Leadership: Estimates and Correlations for 42 U.S. Chief Executives". 'Political Psychology' 27: 511–526. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00524.x. 
  106. ^ Dobson, Roger. "Bush IQ low on presidential league", Times Online, 2006-09-10. Retrieved on 2006-09-10. 
  107. ^ Bush gets bad rap on intelligence. St. Cloud Times Online (2001-01-14). Retrieved on 2006-10-09.
  108. ^ "Who is smarter, Kerry or Bush?", USA Today, 2005-06-10. Retrieved on 2007-04-16. 
  109. ^ Asian News International. "George Bush reveals his battle with booze", Yahoo India News, 2007-12-13. Retrieved on 2006-12-16. 
  110. ^ Weisberg, Jacob. "Bush, in his own words", Guardian Unlimited, 2000-11-04. Retrieved on 2006-10-09. 
  111. ^ Dana Milbank (April 22, 2001). Serious 'Strategery' As Rove Launches Elaborate Political Effort, Some See a Nascent Clintonian 'War Room'. Washington Post. Retrieved on 2006-10-09.
  112. ^ Geyer, Georgie Anne. "Georgie Anne Geyer: A spreading terror", Dallas Morning News, 2007-05-31. Retrieved on 2007-05-31. 
  113. ^ Sean-Paul Kelley (April 30, 2007). Bush in the Bunker. The Huffington Post. Retrieved on 2007-05-31.
  114. ^ Marinucci, Carla. "Cowboy george: Bush's unexpected squeeze of the German chancellor has the Internet howling", San Francisco Chronicle, 2006-07-19. Retrieved on 2007-05-31. 
  115. ^ "Bush: Liebes-Attacke auf Merkel (Bush: Love Attack on Merkel!)", Bild, 2007-05-01. Retrieved on 2007-06-02. 
  116. ^ Bush Uses Woman's Clothing As Kleenex. About.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-12.
  117. ^ Alabama Getaway. Rolling Stone. Retrieved on 2007-06-12.
  118. ^ George W. Bush's missing year. Salon.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-12.
  119. ^ Bush's One-Fingered Victory Salute. About.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-12.
  120. ^ Mark Silva. "Bush to mother: Don't sell on eBay", Chicago Tribune, 2007-05-31. Retrieved on 2007-06-05. 
  121. ^ a b Experts: Bush Presidency Is A Failure; Little Chance To Improve Ranking. Siena Research Institute. May 1, 2006
  122. ^ a b McElvaine, Robert S. "HNN Poll: 61% of Historians Rate the Bush Presidency Worst". 1 April 2008. Available online.

[edit] External links

v • d • e
George W. Bush
Family
Pets
Life
Politics
Policies
Perceptions