User talk:Cresshead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Meanwhile In Hollywood.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Meanwhile In Hollywood.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Prince's Palace of Monaco has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of "Graphic Tables"

A page you created, Graphic Tables, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Roadrunnerz45 (talk 2 me) 13:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stop messing with today's featured article, please

Stop messing with Prince's Palace of Monaco before you're blocked, please. bishzilla ROARR!! 13:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC).

The recent edit you made to Graphic Tables constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Roadrunnerz45 (talk 2 me) 13:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Graphic Tables, you will be blocked from editing. Fallenfromthesky (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Graphic Tables, you will be blocked from editing. Fallenfromthesky (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Josh donald

A tag has been placed on Josh donald requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oh and stop with the fake protection tagging. Blowdart | talk 10:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Triwbe (talk) 10:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Josh donald. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Blowdart | talk 10:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Josh donald, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Blowdart | talk 10:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to The Simpsons (season 10).
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tiggerjay (talk) 10:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was hacked. I apologise for the things that I didn't changed. Can I say I love Wars too. And that person called Josh Donald is a real person, btw."

Decline reason: "Although I do not believe your claim to have been 'hacked,' you are still responsible for all edits made by this account. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Mattew tubb

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tom Harris (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to User:Tiggerjay/sandbox.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tiggerjay (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Tiggerjay/sandbox

Thank you for your kind words. However I have no ability to block you, so you're misguided. Have a great day. :) Tiggerjay (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 18:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Hello, I am very sorry. I was logged onto Wikipedia during my Graphic Design lesson at school and while I was at the printer and my friend must have changed someone in Tiggerjay's sandbox as a joke. I enjoy editing articles about bands, and would be ever so grateful if you could unblock me. I never leave my Wikipedia account logged on in school again!"

Decline reason: "If this is so, your account has been compromised and it would be better if you just started a new one with a different password. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

}