Talk:Creative destruction
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| B | rated as b-Class on the assessment scale |
| Mid | rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Economics WikiProject, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve economics-related articles.. |
| B | rated as B-Class on the assessment scale |
| High | rated as High-importance on the importance scale |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
[edit] Comment
"Let us hope that a new generation of textbooks emerges soon: it is bound to creatively destroy the old." Bit POV, no? --68.55.216.65 18:43, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Where's the bit about Karl Marx come from? That sounds like it needs a citation.
Seems like a bit of a jump to go from Bakunin and Nietzsche straight into a discussion of business cycles. Also a bit of a let-down, there must be scope for a deeper philosophical exposition of the concept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.38.42.167 (talk) 08:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Categories: B-Class business and economics articles | Mid-importance business and economics articles | B-Class Economics articles | High-importance Economics articles | B-Class, High-importance Economics articles | WikiProject Economics articles | Unassessed Philosophy articles | Unassessed ethics articles | Unknown-importance ethics articles | Ethics task force articles
