Talk:Cre recombinase
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Genetics, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to genetics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this page, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information. The WikiProject's current monthly collaboration is focused on improving Restriction enzyme. |
||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Low | This article is on a subject of low-importance within molecular and cellular biology. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
[edit] Keep the page!
I like having this page here and having it linked to Cre-LoxP recombination. I'll introduce a link to this page from the main site.
One describes the process, this page is dedicated to the protein itself. Dr Aaron 22:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
strong keep as above--Kaushal mehta
Since it's a stub and the other is a complete article, why not combine them. When I searched for "loxp" I was linked to this article but not to Cre-LoxP article. Ideally a search for either Cre recombinase or LoxP would lead to the Cre-LoxP recombination article. I think Cre recombinase is not conceptually seperate enough from it's function on LoxP sites to justify a seperate article. Definitely put the information into the Cre-LoxP recomination article though.
[edit] plagiarism?
The definition for this entry is exactly the same as the definition of Cre recombinase from the New England Biolabs commercial products site, with the exception that they actually include references, does this not qualify as plagiarism? Ukmarta 09:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- If this is true, can you please re-write it if you have time? It would be better for it to be re-worded, rather than deleted. Thanks in advance, Dr Aaron 10:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
