From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Welcome 2 Past Messages 2.1 Attacking Much? 2.2 Circle redirect 2.3 List of rivers of Slovakia 2.4 Algorithm 2.5 White Gold

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to my Talk Page, please click the link below to leave a new message.

Leave a New Message

[edit] Past Messages

[edit] Attacking Much?

fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you dyke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I will recommend administrators take a closer look at this user.Matthew Glennon (talk) 07:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Removed more vandalism from this page, see history for details. Matthew Glennon (talk) 07:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Resolved.

Matthew Glennon (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Circle redirect

I think we crossed paths there. The article should be at Novak Djokovic, and the other location should be a redirect. Please ask me if you've got any questions about that. -GTBacchus^(talk) 20:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed Matthew Glennon (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of rivers of Slovakia

Hi, you tagged the List of rivers of Slovakia for cleanup. Could you be more specific about what needs to be cleaned up? Please do so on the talk page of the article. Markussep ^Talk 08:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Matthew Glennon (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Algorithm

The algorithm article has numerous Harvard style; it's surprising that you tagged it as lacking in-text citations. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed Matthew Glennon (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about it; Harvard refs aren't so common, and it's easy to think that the lack of a footnotes section means there are no inline citations. Especially in math and science articles, it helps to read through the article to get a sense of what referencing style is being used. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] White Gold

Hi, the recent edit you made to White gold has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. James086^{Talk | Email} 09:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I added a ^{[citation needed]} citation to another statement? I fail to see how it was unconstructive? Matthew Glennon^(Talk) 09:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

My apologies. I meant to revert the addition of that section and must have caught you instead. I have fixed up the article now. I didn't intend to warn you, I meant to warn the person who added the content and I thought it was you. Again, sorry about that. James086^{Talk | Email} 09:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

That's cool. Have a great one man! Matthew Glennon^(Talk) 09:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Resolved.