User talk:Crazydoodle69

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Administrators are bias.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Trashcan Comedies

A tag has been placed on Trashcan Comedies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 17:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Accounting4Taste, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron⁸³ 17:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow you guys sure are quick. Just sitting at you computers all day and doing nothing but bullying people that you don't even know

Your sense of entitlement regarding someone else's website is noted. --Calton | Talk 23:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Crazydoodle69

A tag has been placed on on your user page, User:Crazydoodle69, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam and the guidelines on user pages.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page in question and leave a note on this page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 23:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Calton

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Calton may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 14:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

That's the same thing that happened to me. YOU came in and deleted my profile. So YOU vandalized MY page. I thought personal profiles were where you can tell people who you are. But mine was deleted for doing so. Crazydoodle69 2:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope. You were trying to use someone else's web resources to flog your non-notable program. Which is, you know, not allowed and ought to be common sense to not do generally.--Calton | Talk 14:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to 1990, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution to Cannibal Corpse, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Quaeler (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:Crazydoodle69, you will be blocked from editing. Quaeler (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Inappropriate speedy requests

Please stop making speedy deletion requests such as this and this. They are invalid and inappropriate, and disruptive behavior meant to illustrate a point is not acceptable. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated vandalism after multiple warnings. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

DGG (talk) 15:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You vandalize a bunch of stuff, give yourself barnstars (which don't even count) and then you blame other users? You say you, "hate Wikipedians that abuse their power and push people like me around like the afformentioned Calton," but that doesn't even make sense. How did this Calton user push you around? Look to me like he just warned you for vandalizing things. Also how do Wikipedians, "abuse their power"? And you claim you're being pushed around which is utterly ridiculous. If you don't like it, do something about it. It seems to me you're acting like a victim and want people to feel sorry for you when all you do is go around and vandalize crap. You are the one abusing your power! By putting a speedy deletion template on Cannibal Corpse for a "lack of interesting content" is total abuse. First off, the Cannibal Corpse page is a fine article. And if you don't like the article that doesn't mean you can do shit like that. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 20:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Crazydoodle69, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Removal of warnings from your talk page violates Wikipedia policy. Please do not continue to delete them. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I have removed the Original Barnstar from your user page, as you "awarded" it to yourself simply to attack another editor. Please do not make such attacks in the future. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)