User talk:Craitman17
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Your edits to PEZ
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Beakerboy 15:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Scouting for girls
A tag has been placed on Scouting for girls, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Whpq 17:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] July 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:JosephGleeson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 09:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: United Home kit
Yes, I noticed that the other day. Unfortunately, I didn't make the kit image used in the Man Utd article, so I don't have the ability to change it myself. Thanks for pointing it out though. - PeeJay 14:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Molvanîa flag.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Molvanîa flag.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Devon articles
I had no idea what you were planning to do with those. They were little more than "X is a town in Devon." Sorry if I created more work for you, but small stubs like that are usually redirected back to a broader article. Won't happen again now that I know what you have in mind. User:Blofeld of SPECTRE does the same things with French towns and I should have concluded that you were doing the same. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Klaksvík twin towns
Hi, Where did you found informations about Klaksvík twin towns? I was on the Trondheim website about it and there was no Klaksvík in that list. Viltharis (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. I thought that you put this information on page about Klaksvík. I found this information in www.klaksvik.fo, but website of Trondheim says that they "have close ties with Klaksvik (The Faroe Islands)" ([1]) so what do you think - we should trust Faroese site or Norwegian? :) Viltharis (talk) 18:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
