Talk:Cranbrook School Sydney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.	Schools Portal
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-Importance within Schools.

Portal	Cranbrook School Sydney is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Prefects

Is it really necessary or appropriate to list out all the current prefects? There's something about listing non-notable minors which just doesn't sit well with me. As a test, I clicked on all the schools in the above WP Schools box and none of them list current students, only notable former students. I really think the prefects section should be removed and only notable former students should be listed. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

I totally agree, Sarah. It's exactly what I was thinking should be removed before I even came onto the talk page. It is irrelevant to knowledge about the school. I say we delete the specific boys names - but perhaps keep the top line about how prefects are elected and place it in another part of the article. Jpeob (Talk) 11:35, 24 April 2006 (EST)

[edit] Welcome to "Schools"

Good page. Initial assessment is above. Well done. As you note your page is not yet in Wiki style but has a lot of information. Victuallers 15:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Day boy houses

I am wondering why the details of the day boy houses have been significantly condensed (though the same not done to the boarding houses) -- was this a conscious editorial decision, or yet another incidence of vandalism? (Personally, I prefer the expanded version that used to be there -- there doesn't seem to be any space constraint issue with this page, and the information about the namesakes of the houses is interesting and informative.) LKG123 09:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)