Talk:Covariant classical field theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses.

[edit] Where does it go?

I wanted to add an article on this formalism of classical field theory, but was unsure of whether to place it in an existing article or do it completely separately, as it's own entity. Some of the articles on this topic, such as Lagrangian mechanics and classical field theory, are already very long and often there is repetition between articles of such a close nature. Twalton 15:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

I think a separate page for the formalism is good, as it goes into depth and involves complicated mathematical structures that are perhaps not suitable in articles which will have a wider readership, such as Lagrangian mechanics. I note you've placed a link the Classical field theory page; but there is more to be placed in several articles.

I note that the Action (physics) and Lagrangian articles already duplicate a lot of material. What's to be done with this? Masud 14:18, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, a separate page is appropriate. Actually, I placed the link to the classical field theory page :). I think some people were trying to sort out some kind of merger of the duplicated material in Action (physics) and Lagrangian. I'm not sure what happened regarding that. MP (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)