Talk:County class destroyer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start	rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
High	rated as High-importance on the assessment scale

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

[edit] Sea Slug effective?

I think most sources would agree that Seaslug was not, in fact, a successful system. It had huge "ship impact" (the ship needed to be large and expensive, and to be designed around it) and, like other beam-riding missile systems, rendered the carrying ship vulnerable to beam-riding retaliation. These factors probably explain the comparatively short service lives of these large and costly ships.--Vvmodel (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Talk:County class destroyer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Sea Slug effective?

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search