Talk:County Route 115 (Tompkins County, New York)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article County Route 115 (Tompkins County, New York) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 27, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics New York State routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

[edit] Merge

I don't care what gets merged where, but there's absolutely no reason for these two articles to coexist. – TMF 02:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I think, if anything's gonna be merged it would be 330 into 115, as 115 is the dominant article and the better condition one.Mitch32contribs 02:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The writing needs some work. Almost every sentence begins with "Route 115..." Another problem is the lack of Wikilinks. The entire route description only has one or two blue links. Also, four paragraphs in the lead for a fairly short article is two too many.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    I'd love to see more information, but it should do.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I'd like to see an image of the route, but it's fine.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

It's close, but it just needs some minor work. Good luck, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

It's still quite dry, but there are no particular issues, so I guess it passes. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 12:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)