Cost segregation study

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article does not cite any references or sources. (January 2008) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed.

Taxation in the United States
This article is part of a series on Taxation
Federal taxation
Authority · History Internal Revenue Service Court · Forms · Code · Revenue
Income tax · Payroll tax Alternative Minimum Tax Estate tax · Excise tax Gift tax · Corporate tax Capital gains tax
State & local taxation
State income tax · State tax levels Sales tax · Use tax · Property tax
Federal tax reform Competitive Tax Plan Efficient Taxation of Income Real Property Use Tax Taxpayer Choice Act USA Tax · Value Added Tax FairTax · Flat tax
Tax protesting History America: Freedom to Fascism The Law that Never Was Cheek v. United States Notable tax protesters Irwin Schiff Richard Michael Simkanin Robert Clarkson · Tom Cryer Vivien Kellems Wayne C. Bentson Wesley Snipes
Tax protester arguments Constitutional Statutory · Conspiracy
Taxation by country Australia • British Virgin Islands Canada • China • Colombia France • Germany • Hong Kong India • Indonesia • Ireland Netherlands • New Zealand Peru • Russia • Singapore Tanzania • United Kingdom United States • European Union  v • d • e  Tax rates around the world Tax revenue as % of GDP
view • talk • edit

Under United States tax laws and accounting rules, cost segregation is the process of identifying personal property assets that are grouped with real property assets, and separating out personal assets for tax reporting purposes. A cost segregation study identifies and reclassifies personal property assets to shorten the depreciation time for taxation purposes, which reduces current income tax obligations. Personal property assets include a building’s non-structural elements, exterior land improvements and indirect construction costs.

Contents 1 Property asset classification 2 Eligibility 3 Cost segregation study process 4 Tax benefits of cost segregation 5 See also 6 Notes 7 External links

[edit] Property asset classification

Analysis of capital expenditures is used to determine appropriate asset classifications. Cost segregation identifies building costs that would typically be depreciated over a 27.5 or 39-year period and reclassifies them to permit a shorter, accelerated method of depreciation for certain building costs. Costs for non-structural elements, such as wall covering, carpet, accent lighting, portions of the electrical system, and exterior site improvements such as sidewalks and landscaping, can often be depreciated over five, seven or 15 years, rather than over 27.5 or 39 years.

[edit] Eligibility

Real property eligible for cost segregation includes buildings that have been purchased, constructed, expanded or remodeled since 1987. A study is typically cost-effective for buildings purchased or remodeled at a cost greater than $500,000. A cost segregation study is most efficient for new buildings under construction, but it can also uncover retroactive tax deductions for older buildings. Building types studied include

• Apartment complexes
• Automobile dealerships
• Distribution centers
• Fast food restaurants
• Food processing facilities
• Hotels/motels
• Manufacturing plants
• Medical centers
• Nursing homes
• Office buildings
• Retail chains/franchises
• Shopping malls
• Sports stadiums
• Amusement parks
• Supermarkets
• Casinos

[edit] Cost segregation study process

Usually, an accountant and an engineer will analyze architectural drawings, mechanical and electrical plans, and other blueprints to segregate the structural and general building electrical and mechanical components from those linked to personal property. The study also allocates “soft costs,” such as architect and engineering fees, to all components of the building. Cost segregation requires an understanding of construction finance.

[edit] Tax benefits of cost segregation

In addition to providing tax relief, cost segregation can benefit businesses in a number of ways:

1. Maximizing tax savings by adjusting the timing of deductions. When an asset’s life is shortened, depreciation expense is accelerated and tax payments are decreased during the early stages of a property’s life. This, in turn, releases cash for investment opportunities or current operating needs.
2. Creating an audit trail. Improper documentation of cost and asset classifications can lead to an unfavorable audit adjustment. A properly documented cost segregation helps resolve IRS inquiries at the earliest stages.
3. Playing Catch-Up: Retroactivity. Since 1996, taxpayers can capture immediate retroactive savings on property added since 1987. Previous rules, which provided a four-year catch-up period for retroactive savings, have been amended to allow taxpayers to take the entire amount of the adjustment in the year the cost segregation is completed. This opportunity to recapture unrecognized depreciation in one year presents an opportunity to perform retroactive cost segregation analyses on older properties to increase cash flow in the current year.
4. Additional tax benefits. Cost segregation can also reveal opportunities to reduce real estate tax liabilities and identify certain sales and use tax savings opportunities.

Under certain circumstances, segregated assets may qualify for a special 30% bonus depreciation allowed by the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 or a 50% bonus depreciation allowed under the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003.

[edit] See also

• Depreciation
• MACRS

[edit] Notes

[edit] External links

• American Society of Cost Segregation Professionals (http://www.ascsp.org/)
• American Association of Cost Segregation Services (http://www.cost-seg.org/)
• IRS Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide (http://www.irs.gov/businesses/article/0,,id=134180,00.html)