User talk:Corpsedust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Abortion comment
I saw your comment on the Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots discussion page. That sought of comment is really not for the wikipedia discussion pages. It was borne out of frustration, and to be honest I totally agree with you and I thought it was damn funny. The whole discussion is rediculous and I think that was a genius thing to say and well justified but you really should keep things like that to yourself.
I took a look on your user page and you've got a lot of boxes that I want to put on my userpage. The shinigami one is especially cool.
I got in trouble for getting angry at someone once, some Dragonball Z/Youtube fanboy was putting lame in-jokes and catchprases from youtube fanvids on the Wii game page- I got angry and said if he didn't stop I'd come round his house and rape him in the arse. I got banned for a week. lol, while it was fun it's not very wise.
I just wanted to say hi, to warn you not to get too rude in your comments because you get in trouble. And that your userboxes are cool.
Simondrake 23:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Yea looking back i probably should have kept it to myself, i just thought if people are so eager to contribute to an encyclopedia they can grasp the simple concept of what a legitimate source is, and that shit like that can just open the flood gates to vandals and dumbassery. But yea thanks for the heads up ill try to keep cool next time.
[edit] ummm abortion comment
Owe ya a cookie,hella funny. hella put to the point. xD!
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Odinssphere.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Odinssphere.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Recoilgames.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Recoilgames.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Digi-Guys
A tag has been placed on Digi-Guys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Plrk (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)