User:Cornellrockey/Archive04

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is kept for archival purposes only. To leave a message for User:Cornellrockey, please use his talk page.


Contents

[edit] Evil City Trio

The Evil City Trio link was clearly spam, the page is only advertising and keyword blocks. I personally feel that the entire paragraph should be removed but for now I'll just delete the url —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.126.149 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Ithaca Commons

I think you are wrong. What should the citation be, a map? This is not a scholarly article, every background statement doesn't need to be sourced. If they do, why single out those particular statements? Quinten 17:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Forts

I agree so I added it; hope you don't mind. Hmains 03:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] State license plate IFD

Hi. A number of state license plates, including one or more that you uploaded, have been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 2#All state license plates. A photograph of a copyrighted work, such as a license plate, is considered a derivative work and cannot be used freely. Please see the discussion if you would like to participate. Thank you. --BigDT 06:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

The question is whether the thing you photographed constitutes a "creative work" or is its design one of utility or function. Dolls, toys, CD covers, etc, are all primarilly creative in nature. On the other hand, unless you have one of those cell phones with flowers on the cover, the purpose of your cell phone design is one of utility - they are trying to make a cell phone that performs a function, rather than a work of art. See Commons:Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?. In the case of a license plate, if there is artwork on the plate, it is a copyrightable work. Only the copyright owner can authorize a derivative work and so we cannot create a free version of a license plate (at least not one with artwork). If the use of the license plate substantially contributes to the article, we can use it under a claim of fair use, but in the case of the article I went through, it was just a gallery and that isn't a fair use. --BigDT 12:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Movie posters, CD covers, and book covers are all creative and all should be tagged with an appropriate non-free image tag, like {{albumcover}}. They are actually in a further special case that is outside the scope of your question, but important to understand. When you scan, photocopy, or photograph a 2-D object, your act of copying is NOT transformative and no additional copyright is created. That's why we can use CD covers from amazon.com without amazon's permission - they don't own the copyright to them, even if they personally scanned the image. The difference between CD covers and license plates is that we use CD covers in the context of a larger article as a method of identifying the CD that the article is about. That is considered a fair use of the image. The same is true for movie posters, DVD covers, and the like. It's the same reason that amazon.com has a photo of the CD cover - it shows you what CD you are going to buy. If we were writing an article about the license plate itself, it would be find to include a photo of it. As an example, there have been court cases about pro-life license plates. If someone were writing an article about the court case or the plate itself, it would be fine to include a copy of it. Further, in a discussion of novelty plates, it's fine to show photos of such plates. What isn't fine is the List of U.S. state license plates article where all of the plates are merely used in a gallery. That is not a "fair use" of a copyrighted work because we aren't adding anything to the work. Does that help? --BigDT 14:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of DNSKong

You put a {{prod}} on DNSKong. While the tag expired without being removed, I did not delete the article because it was previously created by the same editor and deleted by prod, and both times the article was prod'ed, the author was not notified with {{PRODwarning}}. I interpret the recreation as being a de-facto contesting of the deletion. You are welcome to list the article at articles for deletion. —dgiestc 19:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah guys, unfortunately that was me. I am apologizing again for the mistake. As I said on my talk-page, I just recreated it since I wasn't sure (I thought some spammer might did it or something) why it was deleted. I am not so keen in various Wikipedia's policies, procedures and other such admin/higher-level-user related stuff.
cheers, Wayfarer | on May 8, 2007

[edit] Head Louse

Oh, sorry for rv ing this page. I didn't read it through and see the links, I just assumed that you accidentally edited that page. Sorry for reverting your edit!! - Hairchrm 01:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HEad Louse

I do not see where my last post does not comply with the guidelines as I removed the links to my business website.

It is disingenuous that the Head Louse entry and the Head Louse Treatment entry not include natural cures. There is no information given on natural solutions. I only link to the page that is evaluating natural cures. That is not spamming. I DID take liberties to include the #1 & #2 sites listed but as of my last post, I removed them to comply with the terms. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dserhal (talk • contribs) 21:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] lord knows

hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.127.135.34 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Edits removed, reasons unclear

Hi there,

You recently removed two of my small edits made to the external links sections of carousel and lighthouse. Kindly share your reasons? I feel the information is relevant, valuable and not already present on wikipedia, particularly the information about and pictures of the Dentzel carousel in Glen Echo Trolley Park, the information about the trolley park itself, and the pictures of the lighthouses at South Haven, Michigan. I'd appreciate knowing how you would modify these edits to suit style for inclusion, or else why you feel they are wholly unworthy of inclusion.

FYI, it's not useful to anyone for oldbies to "rubber stamp" newbies' talk pages and histories with 'idiot badges' that are too general to specifically address what was done wrong. I'm eager for your specific enlightenment on how to improve my tiny contributions and avoid this in the future. Small notes, instead of glaring boilerplate, can do wonders. Thanks.

Patriotick 03:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bagramyan article

Hi, I got your message but I did not vandalize the Bagramyan article. It was the cover article today so I went to read up and learn about him. Then I saw some weird words. I simply removed the words "likes pie" from the biography because it didn't make sense. I read further down and realized from inserts referring to "spaghetti monster" that the article had been edited to include these silly words, so I gave up and moved on. I'm not experienced enough with Wiki vandalism to be extensively "fixing" articles so I appreciate that you did so. This is the first time I've seen a vandalized article and it's a shame, like trash strewn at a public park. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cenksumen (talk • contribs) 21:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Caitlin Goodwyn

She is a fictional character in Magical Doremi. WhisperToMe 20:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CATALOG

CATALOG is an informative page with many links to SCONUL, CILIP and the University of Cambridge. It does not belong in more than one category. It is providing information to potential librarians, and as web 2.0 is an interesting topic in librarianship right now, a page giving information about library traineeships has a right to remain on wikipedia.

CATALOG is an informative page with many links to SCONUL, CILIP and the University of Cambridge. It does not belong in more than one category. It is providing information to potential librarians, and as web 2.0 is an interesting topic in librarianship right now, a page giving information about library traineeships has a right to remain on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.130.215 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Removed Astor contribution?

Hi Cr, I noticed you removed my addition to the reference Astor a while back. You listed the reason as Spam? Can you explain? This was not my intent. Am I not allowed the reference to further offsite info? I am not attempting extra traffic or redirects. Just trying to add more info to the Wiki collective.

Prestoffcenter 17:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC) PoC

[edit] Thanks for the welcome

I'll try not to do anything crazy. I think you'll only see small tweaks from me, and just about the San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, where I work. I'm not up to creating pages, but I'd be happy to pass along info, updates, photos, etc. about the park if you're ever interested. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shortdragchantey (talk • contribs) 20:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Image help

Answered on my talk page. -- Fyslee/talk 06:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I see you've tried the "simple" method. Hope it works satisfactorily. There could be some other method, but I only figured out the simple way. -- Fyslee/talk 14:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Marchand

I was just wondering if you could elaborate more on Talk:Steve Marchand to what about the tone that needs fixing so fixing can take place Gang14 19:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Gang14 23:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Joubert.Vravos 02:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the links and the comments. Editing wasn't as intuitive as I thought! 02:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)02:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)~~

[edit] Tailgating

Can you explain to me why you keep deleting the information about tailgating. We are trying to expand this topic and the information keeps getting deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jknlf (talk • contribs)

My comment got deleted too. Just trying to add a bit of the unofficial tailgating rules. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.10.66 (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ivy Bands list

I wonder if it'd be better to have a template for the Ivy Bands to place in all such pages, or else a category for them, instead of manually inserting cross-references from each to each? DMacks 20:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

{{Ivy League Marching Bands}} is now on all 8 bands' pages...didn't bother including the university's own links in them, since the band-names seemed self-explanatory. There are scramble-bands outside the Ivy League too, so if someone cares about this distinction, a similar separate template could be created for scramblers in all leagues (see also Category:Scramble bands). DMacks 21:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Maybe all of the Ivy boxes should be the same color? {{Ivy League}} is a light-green      (I'm not sure why), so could use that one, or else the same green      as the infobox of the Ivy League page itself. DMacks 14:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for putting the New User stuff on my page, but I already have a real account, I just don't feel like logging in now, or for the past long while. 69.17.155.35 17:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] cornell dairy bar

why do you think that Dairy Bar can be considered an "atraction" in Ithaca? Is it somekind of castle,church, museum...is just a Bar...I then propose the Palms as an atraction also. Thanks, gb272—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.41.218 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Centrist

At this moment, I'd say nope. --Xtreambar 19:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] copyright infringement

Hello,

The reason that I am continually deleting this line :*North County News www.northcountynews.com and its affiliated Croton blog for non-anonymous commentary at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croton-on-Hudson,_New_York, is because the listing is infringing upon our trademark and copyright by using the term "Croton blog."

Further, the entry is a dulicate to this entry: *North County News

Please remove my IP block, as the owner of *Crotonblog: Local news about activities, arts, politics, schools and sports for the Village of Croton-on-Hudson, New York 10520., I only seek to protect our intellectual property rights on Wikipedia.

Thank you,

Ross W. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.9.234 (talk • contribs)

[edit] ECACH

Actually, that's someone else who went to RPI, moved to MN, went to SCSU, is a conservative, writes on college hockey, and joined the Army. ;) - RPIRED 14:32, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] World Bank

Why don't you reword it then? Why blank a page? The World Bank and the World Bank Group are different things. Do some research before you edit. I don't have the time to properly write an article on the World Bank, but your attitude is just moronic. Please try and edit constructively, and not destructively. Information on the World Bank is available at [www.worldbank.org] and on the World Bank Group at [www.worldbankgroup.org]. Thanks... 62.72.110.11 15:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] World Bank

I'm the anonymous user, The World Bank and World Bank Group are different, the WB consists of the IBRD and the IDA, the WBG consists of those two (the World Bank) as well as the Interational Finance Corporation; the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. If they were the same, they wouldn't have two different websites and two different names. There seems to have been a series of misunderstandings, and the WBG article is most unclear on drawing definitions between the two. Thanks for your cooperation and criticisms. Whiskey in the Jar 15:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Whiskey in the Jar, if you really believe there is a useful distinction between World Bank and World Bank Group it might be more useful if you were to separate the World Bank Group in to the two articles — it looks like World Bank has been copied from elsewhere, i.e. is a copyright violation. The concensus for two years has been that one page is sufficient, I think you need to prove why two articles are needed rather than pointing a finger at those who are restoring the concensus (to date). Rich257 16:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RWDSU_anthony_weiner.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RWDSU_anthony_weiner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 03:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

For your kind welcome. I have experience on wikiversity, but I don't edit on there anymore :P. The sunder king 15:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re:Overkill categories

Thanks for pointing that out! I guess I didn't even realize the policy, I will try and sort them appropriately in the future. It's a good thing you pointed that out before I started on the New York Democrats since there are far many more of them. Thanks again. Mrprada911 20:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You are hereby awarded the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your tireless efforts in reverting vandalism. Keep up the good work! Dansiman 07:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jeb Bradley.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeb Bradley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] jodie marsh content

whats wrong with the edit i did on the jodie marsh page? i removed duplicate content, and moved possible trash to the discussion page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by JasperRB (talk • contribs)

[edit] Education City (Queensland)

A tag has been placed on Education City (Queensland), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Evil1987 02:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Education City (Queensland)

Education City (Queensland), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Education City (Queensland) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education City (Queensland) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Education City (Queensland) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Evil1987 12:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Why was my fact about Collettsville on the North Carolina page removed? I am trying to prevent Collettsville from being an orphaned article and am linking articles to do so.

[edit] misunderstanding

Why was my fact about Collettsville taken off the North Carolina page. I am trying to prevent the Collettsville page from being an orphan page and am adding links to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azruski (talk • contribs)


[edit] Hi thx for returning the svastica

Hi there... I'm sorry, I'm not a native speaker of english u.u but... do you mean that actually that nazi logo is the sign for Falun Gong??? I didn't mean to do a test edit u.u I just thought the vandalism was the svastica... I guess I'm wrong u.u Thx anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biyu copy (talk • contribs)

[edit] Re: Welcome

I've made a number of edits (mostly minor stuff) in the past, but as a result of your message I've just registered. Thanks for the info! Nomad84 14:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Utica Ny

I was born in Utica Ny, and have lived in Calif do the past 32 years. The contributions I am making are not Vandal bus accurate updates. Don Cestone —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.104.175.224 (talk) 20:25:43, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Homosexuality in women's sports article and AfD'ing

Hi, The orphan tag is not appropriate as speaks to the wikilinks which are internal to WP. I've added over a dozen myself so I know that it's no longer an orphan. I wasn't accusing you of abusing the AfD process you were stating it. The AfD process is for hopeless articles which can't be improved through regular editing, many do abused the AfD process so please avoid doing it. Many articles do need improving but doing so by use of AfDing doesn't bring the inspired and enlightening editing that makes truly great WP articles, IMO. No one seems to disagree with you that the article is poorly written and needs work but it's not a hopeless or unencyclopedic article just one that needs work and can be greatly improved with regular editing. Benjiboi 13:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling and No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith

"Although in research and comprehensiveness No Man Knows My History has now been surpassed by Richard Lyman Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling" > there is not a single citation to back up the claim that the Bushman book is more comprehensive or better researched. I am restoring the 'citation needed' tags until the claims are added, or the language is changed. cOrneLlrOckEy 15:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Bushman's book is more than twice as long as Brodie's and his citations cover more than a hundred pages. Brodie's summary footnotes probably don't occupy a tenth of that space. Bushman is a distinguished historian; Brodie's degrees were in literature. Most important are the number of new sources that have become available over the past sixty years. What else can I provide to satisfy your request?--John Foxe 15:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replied on John Foxe's page: The number of citations in Bushman's book doesn't speak to quality or depth of research, it speaks to the number of citations. The length of book means that he was more verbose, not necessarily more comprehensive. THe statement in the No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith article demands proof from a third-party source (a book review or third- party historian) specifically claiming that the Bushman book is better than Brodie's, or I could rewrite the language in the No Man Knows article to not make unproven claims. Thoughts? cOrneLlrOckEy 15:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks.--John Foxe 17:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] ITimes vs. IJournal

Cornell Rocky,

The Ithaca Times does indeed have a larger circulation than the Ithaca Journal within the city, a fact the editors of both papers will readily admit. Ithaca Times: 22,000 weekly in the city. Ithaca Journal: daily circulation 17,111 and a Saturday circulation of 21,830 combined city and surrounding towns.

Additionally, within the city itself, the Journal is oft derided as "The Urinal." Even those who do respect it acknowledge that it is mediocre at best due to poor resources and correspondingly inadequate staffing.


The Times, on the other hand, enjoys a solid reputation and is widely read.

No vandalism here. In fact, I am a journalist who has worked for the Journal's corporate parent and once explored a job at the Journal. That's why I am aware of these facts. Both papers admit them.

Cheers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.39.176.142 (talk) 06:02, August 23, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sage Chapel

Looks great! I see you wrote Charles Babcock also. I had always meant to write those two articles. Glad to see someone got around to them. In a similar vein, I want to write William Henry Miller (architect), might be something you'd want to look at. --Xtreambar 01:49, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Rockey, nice work. I tweaked some language, bt otherwise a very solid article. I tried to find a citation to insert the fact that brides usually wait in the mausoleum before weddings, but I couldn't find one. Anywho, Go Big Red. --Cjs56 02:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the welcome message!

I've been editing stuff for over a year, but better late than never, right? :) I'm a Cornell Dropout who lived in Dryden and graduated from TC3 and SUNY Cortland, so thanks for the work on the Ithaca pages! Sometimesdee 17:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thanks for not banning me. My brother knows my account and knows delaware is my class project. Can you help me with this i don't know how everything works like changeing my password... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pugwawa (talk • contribs)

[edit] edit war?

You are accusing me of an edit war when I was removing vandalism? At least look at the edits first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.215.55 (talk) 20:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi from Esperanto-vikipediisto

Thank you very much, but my english is not very good, and all I do in the english wikipedia is adding of esperanto-references, because the robots do not do this very well (sometimes it's very long, sometimes it never does work). You can find me in the esperanto-vikipedio where I am "lvh". Bea --83.195.99.10 12:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CUWiki link on Cornell U. page

What do you think would make the CUWiki link you deleted a worthy link? Opakapaka 17:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Its a minor project, and I don't feel it complied with WP:EL. cOrneLlrOckEy 17:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Point taken. We'll see where it goes over the next couple months. Opakapaka 17:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scapa Flow

Hi! I reverted your edit as looking at the line you had changed showed the other ship's name in the same sentence before your italicisation to be non-italicised, which still is. IE: Royal Oak, which does not have the required prefix of HMS either. Hence the comment in the edit summary. Why change one and not the other? Richard Harvey 17:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism on Cornell Central Campus

Thank you for protecting the Cornell Central Campus article and restoring the vandalism from the HS IP address. This is my first vandalism experience. Meanwhile, I have been trying my hand at the Universitas Cornelliana article on Vicipaedia. Perhaps you can help with it. The article got at least one rave review from John Platt, who wrote, "OK, I thought by having a Windows Mobile 6 phone and sending email, I would win the Nerdus Maximus title, but clearly I bow to a superior force." Perhaps we can meet for lunch.Racepacket 19:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

The Vicipaedia Cornell article can be found at: http://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universitas_Cornelliana
My office is on 23rd st.
My email is available through my user page or the racepacket website.Racepacket 21:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Fingers 6

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fingers 6, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingers 6. Thank you. --B. Wolterding 17:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adminship?

You are a very constructive editor, and you are very unlikely to abuse the tools, so would you like me to nominate you for adminship or not? NHRHS2010 Talk 00:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I have been nominated before, but so many opposes came in that I withdrew my RfA. I heard that you are in Cornell WikiProject, and you even go to that school. By the way, I know someone who goes to Cornell University. NHRHS2010 Talk 21:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the kudos

Dartmouth Big Green has been floundering for a while, I'm hoping to fix it up a bit. We've just started a Dartmouth WikiProject and that's one of a few articles that really need attention. Feel free to hop on board, although I see from your userpage that your allegiance might be to a different Ivy League institution :) Dylan 21:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Cornell University Logo

Sorry, I was just in the process of replying (I had to dig the exact page name up first...). The only FU rationale on the page was the following:

Fair use rational:
Illustrates the logo in question.
{{no rationale}}
{{Non-free logo}}

This doesn't describe how the logo itself contributes to the reader's understanding of the article(s) in question, et cetera. Also, could you give me a list of what articles/templates this was used on? Thanks, ^demon[omg plz] 18:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Be that as it may, I'm not concerned with *where* it's used, provided a valid rationale was written for each usage, which was not done. ^demon[omg plz] 22:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MAC OS X

How do you turn one on? I know this looks like a stupid question, but I can't figure out how... Dreamy § 23:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

It says on your page that you use a Mac OS X, right? So, how do you turn it on? Dreamy § 11:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
No... Where is the power button? Dreamy § 14:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] weirdo

why do you post messages accusing people of vandalism without backing up your claims? you don't even LIVE in this state!

At least have the courtesy to post what specifically you are disputing before rolling it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.202.73.167 (talk) 20:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] weirdo

why do you post messages accusing people of vandalism without backing up your claims? you don't even LIVE in this state!

At least have the courtesy to post what specifically you are disputing before rolling it back.

it's no wonder that people opposed you as an editor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.202.73.167 (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)