From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
|
| Food and drink task list: |
|
|
|
Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
- Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Food, Bread, Beef, Curry, Drink, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yoghurt, Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom)
- Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: , Italian cuisine, Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies, Coffee, Milk, Pasta, French cuisine, Chocolate
- Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Burger King
- Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
- Get rid of Trivia sections in articles you are working on.
- Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner to food and drink related articles to help bring them to members attention. It could encourage new members to the project too.
- Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of food
- Review articles currently up for GA status: Burger King legal issues, Chocolate
- Review articles currently up for FA status: Butter
|
|
|
[edit] Introduced comercially
This strikes me as a bit odd -- how can a traditional cultivar have been "introduced comercially in 1813"? I imagine that these apples were bought and sold before 1813, and an apple isn't like a car -- it isn't normally "introduced". Perhaps today a large company could take a rare heirloom and begin selling it through large distribution channels -- in this event, it would make sense to speak of its "introduction". But in 1813? Maybe. But until we get a source, I'm taking it out. --Zantastik talk 10:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have reintroduced this date, which seems to be universally accepted, and given a source. It's interesting to note that 1813 is given for a number of apples - I see that a book Catalogue of Fruits was published that year and could be a common source. Saga City 14:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
