Talk:Cornerstone Community
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to WikiProject Urban studies and planning, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
Cornerstone Community is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] References/sources
- where'd the content for this article come from? are there any sources/references other than the cornerstone website?
the article really needs some verifiability especially re. the quote from the ATO. Asch246 12:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Personally this whole article reads more like an advertisement than anything else. Dean Tregenza 04:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality
- The section in question is the last paragraph- regarding the cornerstone online forums. I think this section overall needs re-writing, but the last paragraph amounts to opinion. Do people agree/disagree? What are some suggestions for resolving the issue? Re-write, omission or...? Asch246 07:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've attempted to re-write the paragraph. Any comment? Is there anything else that needs to be added to this paragraph? asch246 08:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Original research
Without citing sources/references, this section appears to be original research. It really needs verifiability. Especially under question is the last two paragraphs, which provide sources for the definitions, but not for the proposition that Cornerstone comes under them. asch246 05:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pioneers of the emerging church movement
Cornerstone is often viewed as one of the pioneers of the emerging church movement given its emphasis is on training the laity in relevant and life-style based mission.
I am sorry, but Cornerstone certainly does not have such a reputation as being pioneers of the emerging church movement. If it did surely there would be some publications out there by some members of Cornerstone. Dean Tregenza 04:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
