Talk:Coral Smith/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Danielfolsom deleting sourced info

I've added back in the info about Coral stating that she had not been in a relationship with Abram, because I had a source for that. I don't know why Danielfolsom thought he could go to the page and completely eliminate it from the article when he knew their was a source. I've only now just realized he did that. The dispute was about Misgospia getting another source, which she's done and now her information can remain in the article. However, there was nothing ever wrong with the information I had because it was sourced. You had no right to go in there and completely get rid of that, Daniel. Also, edit summaries are not used for anything else other than explaining your edits so other editors on wikipedia know what it was for, Daniel. You've written something like WOHO! in the part where you add your source.

edit summary page even says you should strive to answer the question, "Why did you make this edit?". Providing an edit summary, even if the edit is minor, makes Wikipedia work better by quickly explaining to other users what your change was about.

edit summaries aren't used for nonsense like what you've put in yours on this page when you add in your source, Daniel. That's used only to explain your edit EverybodyHatesChris 05:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't the one that did that (mainly). I removed the whole, entire comment until a source could be found because of the dispute. Misgospia added ti back, and she might have changed it without me realizing, but I didn't remove the part about them not being a couple - I just added the source. Next time get your facts right --danielfolsom 05:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] EHC

Please note I gave User:EverybodyHatesChris a 3 hour block (since expired at the time of writing) so he might contemplate the consequences of continuing his method of contributing to Wikipedia. I have no great confidence that it will have the desired effect, so I am noting this on this page in case he attempts to include editors here in any further actions/reactions. If you have any further problems with this editor (I am watching the previously effected pages, including this one) please let me know. LessHeard vanU 19:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)