Cornsweet illusion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cornsweet illusion. Left part of the picture seems to be darker than the right one. In fact they have the same brightness.
Cornsweet illusion. Left part of the picture seems to be darker than the right one. In fact they have the same brightness.
The same image as above, but the edge in the middle is hidden. Left and right part of the image look of the same color now.
The same image as above, but the edge in the middle is hidden. Left and right part of the image look of the same color now.
The actual distribution of luminance in the picture, and the typical perception of luminance.
The actual distribution of luminance in the picture, and the typical perception of luminance.

The Cornsweet illusion, also known as Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusion or Craik-Cornsweet illusion, is an optical illusion that was described in detail by Tom Cornsweet in the late 1960s.[1] Craik and O'Brien had made earlier observations in a similar vein.

In the image at right, the entire region to the right of the "edge" in the middle looks slightly lighter than the area to the left of the edge, but in fact the brightness of both areas is exactly the same, as can be seen by blacking out the region containing the edge.

This phenomenon is similar to the familiar phenomenon of simultaneous contrast and Mach bands, but differs from it in two important respects.

  • In Mach bands the effect is seen only on areas that are close to the intensity gradient. In Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusion, a very small area (the central "edge") affects the perception of entire large areas, portions of which are distant from the edge.
  • In the Cornsweet illusion, the region adjacent to the light part of the edge appears lighter, and the region adjacent to the dark part of the edge appears darker, just the opposite of the usual contrast effects.

The third image at right shows the usual explanation of the effect. A far more convincing and dramatic version of the effect can be seen in the article by Purves, Lotto, and Nundy,[2] where it is presented within a quasi-realistic image of solid, illuminated objects.[3] These writers give a (teleological) explanation of this and other illusions, in which the visual system and brain are posited to generate percepts on an empirical basis that is much like a reflex. In their words, ...[perception] accords not with the features of the retinal stimulus or the properties of the underlying objects, but with what the same or similar stimuli have typically signified in the past.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Cornsweet T (1970) Visual Perception. New York: Academic Press.
  2. ^ Purves D., Lotto R.B., Nundy S. (2002) We See What We Do, American Scientist 90(3):236-243.
  3. ^ Quasi-realistic image from Purves, Lotto, and Nundy (2002) showing a much more convincing presentation of the Cornsweet illusion.

[edit] Further reading

  • Purves D, Shimpi A, Lotto RB (1999) An empirical explanation of the Cornsweet effect. J. Neurosci. 19:8542-8551.
  • Purves D, Lotto RB (2003) Why We See What We Do: An Empirical Theory of Vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Purves D, Lotto RB (2004) The Cornsweet effect. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 3rd edition Elsevier Science Publishing Co.


[edit] External links