Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2007 October 22/Articles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles

  • Alec Reeves (history · last edit) from [1]. TomStar81 (Talk) 02:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
    The copyright holder claims to offer permission on the article Talk page, so I have explained how to release the text until the GFDL. --Spike Wilbury talk 03:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • The Homes of Donegal (history · last edit) from [2]. — Coren (talk) 02:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
    After quite a bit of research, it appears that those lyrics were written in 1955. I can find no earlier publishing. — Coren (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Let my try this again. The image associated with this talk page seems to contain material copyrighted by Microsoft. -- Mumia-w-18 04:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Kilkenny limestone (history · last edit) from [3]. TheJosh 11:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Image talk:Lurs.jpg (history · last edit) from [Unknown original source for an image supplied in 2004 by an admin, then casually reviewed in 2005. One possible source is http://abel.hive.no/trompet/lur/bronze/brudevaelte.html, but given how long this image has been in WP that page could have gotten it from here.]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT 12:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Niakwa Programming Language (history · last edit) from [4]. Nomination completed by DumbBOT 12:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Friday Center (history · last edit) from [5]. Unquestionably identical text, but timing order is questionable due to dynamic nature of probable source. GRBerry 17:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • William D. Euille (history · last edit) from [6]. Joel7687 17:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Mensa International (history · last edit) from [7]. Many section appear to be direct cut/paste from www.mensa.orgKeeper | 76 22:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
    • This issue was addressed in 2004, and again just a year ago ... you should have read the Talk page archives ... I have removed the copyvio tag. —72.75.79.128 23:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
      • Whether it was addressed previously or not is of little concern. The wik article reads the same as the mensa homepage for mensa. Unless the mensa hompage says "as taken from the "wikipedia article" then I don't see how this is NOT a copyright problem...Keeper | 76 00:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
        I don't really see any cause for concern here. It's obvious the site was used as a source, but sufficient rewording exists in my judgment. What phrases did you find that are duplicates? --Spike Wilbury talk 04:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Voz Veis (history · last edit) from [8].  Andreas  (T) 22:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)