Talk:Copycat (Marvel Comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (publisher): Marvel Comics work group

Despite 24.163.87.180's rephrasing of sentences since the initial exact duplicate from [1] I feel this still poses a copyright violation. Oh, and adding a sentence that this website had "not been looked at under any circumstances" seems a blatant lie, since it is clear the initial version of this article was an exact duplicate of that web page. UkPaolo 14:04, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

You know what? I was not the first to post on that site. I saw that someone had been accused of copyright infrigement, so I decided to take things into my own hands. Everything I wrote is mine. They are MY words and for anyone to think differently is proposterous. Please, do not label this article as infringing on copyrights. They are my words. I AM the author. Do not let this continue to happen. Have you read the two separate articles? If you have, then you would have noticed the differences and then understood that those are MY words! Copycat is a favourite character of mine, so I want to see her profile back on Wikipedia as soon as possible. I am faith that you people will finally read the two articles to determine that they are NOT the same. Thank you...

above unsigned comment by User:Demitri7

I suggest you compare [2] and [3]: you will see that they are both identical. I of course read your message regarding copyright (which was innappropriately placed, and belonged on this talk page) but as I said above, I feel this still poses a copyright problem since the article in it's current form is basically just a slightly rephrased variant of that original copied text. I'm sorry if you disagree, but now this page is listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems then some administrators will take a look, and make a decision. In the meantime, if you wish to see an article on Copycat on Wikipedia, I suggest you leave the CopyVio notice on this page intact, and follow it's guidance in creating a new, entirely original, article at a new temp page. This can ultimately replace the CopyVio, or have it's content merged if this article is later found not to be a copyright violation. Regards, UkPaolo 06:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

wouldnt rob liefeld be credited as her creator?

Copycat is incorrectly named Vanessa Carslyle in Cable #37-38 69.138.81.129 20:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)