Talk:Coproduction (social science)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Co-production is actually referenced extensively in the S&TS literature; in fact, it's referred to on the Wikipedia page for technology and society (not my edit!). I'll add other references, but at this point it's not a neologism - it's a conceptual framework.

Or perhaps this should be added to the technology and society page?

How to disambiguate between the already-existing entry for co-production? (So this page, if it should exist, can be called 'co-production' instead of 'co-production (in science and technology studies)'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stequoianie (talkcontribs) 20:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Well we need to work on the title because [[Co-production (in Science and Technology Studies)

]] will really not work. I can do the disambig. I'm thinking co-production should fork into co-production (film) (existing page) and co-production (social science (your contribution. If you agree, I can do the code for the change. Mbisanz (talk) 20:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I think this disambiguation would be ideal, and I'd really appreciate if you'd be willing to do it. Do you think the article needs more edits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stequoianie (talkcontribs) 20:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Disambig done; all articles nee more edits :), I'd suggest expanding the articles you've created. I'm sure there are counterpoints, controversies, developmental histories, etc. Also, you seem to know your way around science and technology, so those articles are always in need of a good editor. Mbisanz (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks again Mbisanz! i'm actually in the process of moving and then leaving town for 3 weeks, so doubtful i'll get to improving this page and other science and technology pages within the next few days, but i'd Love (LOVE) to help with this when i return. interestingly enough, i was just asking my friends the other day: if you had to 'watch over' a few different pages on wikipedia, which ones would you choose? i'd definitely enjoy watching over some of the science and technology pages ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stequoianie (talkcontribs) 05:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)