Talk:Coppa Italia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Coppa Italia is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the Italy task force. |
Contents |
[edit] 1. Round of 16
I wonder if it might get too confusing to show double-leg home and away results on the regular '16TeamBracket' format. What another format be possible? Juveboy 15:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 2. Can someone improve on this format?
[edit] Round of 16
| Team #1 | Agg. | Team #2 | 1st leg | 2nd leg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internazionale (1)  |
?-? | Messina (17) |
? -? | ?-? |
| Empoli (8) |
?-? | Genoa (41) |
? -? | ?-? |
| Chievo (4) |
?-? | Reggina (13) |
? -? | ?-? |
| Palermo (5) |
?-? | Sampdoria (12) |
? -? | ?-? |
| Roma (2) |
?-? | Triestina (34) |
? -? | ?-? |
| Parma (7) |
?-? | Napoli (39) |
? -? | ?-? |
| Milan (3) |
?-? | Brescia (30) |
? -? | ?-? |
| Livorno (6) |
?-? | Arezzo (27) |
? -? | ?-? |
Juveboy 01:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- if someone can set this up without the 'two flag' columns, it would be very much appreciated. Maybe you can then replace the tree thing under the Round of 16 heading, which I think can't work given the double-leg system that will be used Juveboy 12:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3. Runners up
Could someone please check why there are 67 'Runners-up' yet only 59 cups have been awarded. Juve2000 01:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TIM Cup Logo 2006-2007.png
Image:TIM Cup Logo 2006-2007.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
